• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

A Niner Watches Babylon 5 (NO spoilers, please)

There's nothing overstated about it; Babylon 5 is Lord of the Rings In Space.

I think JMS said it best:
{comparing various B5 characters to Lord of the Rings characters}

The characters and comparisons you made are basic archetypal characters
that have long been used in all kinds of sagas...the voice of the wise
master, the characters of action, the hero on a journey, the smaller wiser
folk...they extend far beyond Tolkein. We draw on the same archetypal pool,
but there's no intended parallel between them. What invariably gets lost in
this is that the LoTR saga was a *quest* story, that is the heart of
it...ain't no quest here. The characters are part of the saga-structure that
goes straight back to the Illiad and the Odyssey, Gawain and the Green
Knight, Jason and the Argonauts and elsewhere. The only common elements come
from the fact that we have our roots in the same literary garden of
archetypes and literary symbology.

I didn't fight for five years to get this show off the ground just to do
LoTR with the serial numbers filed off.

or this one:
What I find fascinating in this whole discussion is that, whenever a
novel comes out, people don't generally go through page by page and say,
s"Oh, I think Niven was ripping off/drawing from "Lensman" when he did this
part." They generally only do this to TV people...because it's assumed
that TV people don't have an original idea in their head, and can ony
(only) borrow from other people.

Though I may sometimes nod to one or another landmark of SF, I'm not
doing the Prisoner, Lord of the Rings, Childhood's End, MacBeth, the
Illiad, The Mountains of Madness, or any of the thirty other works that
I'm supposed to be doing, all mutually contradictory. I'm telling this
story, my story, and though it's nice to be compared to such other works,
it does become bothersome after a while when everybody tries to pin down
which work I'm supposed to be "doing" when they NEVER do this to novelists,
because this is TV. C'mon, people, I've written published novels, and
short stories, and plays, and radio dramas, and I *do* have a brain in my
head to maybe make up something on my own, y'know.

Jan
 
There's nothing overstated about it; Babylon 5 is Lord of the Rings In Space.
To be fair, LotR is Greek Mythology In Medieval Briton. JMS often says that was his source more so than Tolkien (such as in a long rant he did here following a S4 episode).

His characters have very little in common with Greek myth (in either case); and in JMS's case far more informed by Tolkein (Tolkein himself owes a little more to the Kalevala, Beowulf, Arthur and the like.) The closest to Greek mythology JMS has is of course Londo,
who is more informed by Greek tragedy than Greek myth, and more by Dr. Faust than Greek tragedy.

Sheridan is Aragorn, not Orpheus or Jesus. The story of him going to Z'ha'dum only follows the broad beat notes of the Greek myth, Sheridan's personality - particularly initially - has a Strider vibe. He is not a beautiful sexualised artist of sweet music destined to be killed in an erotic frenzy; and Sheridan loses his wife because she is already lost, not because he could not bear to agree to the terms by which she leaves Hades - and he destroys Z'ha'dum with sci-fi heroics rather than soothes it with his lyre. Stories such as the Iliad also, say, have far more moral ambiguity than the Shadow War - Sheridan and Garibaldi would never get upset as to which one of them gets to own a rapeable slavegirl; nor would President Clarke be shown to have the humanity of King Priam begging for his son's corpse. The great big cosmic war of Good and Evil... this is far much a Tolkein thing, and it is also a JMS thing, and Z'ha'dum is not Hades, it is not the deserts of Israel, IT IS MORDOR.

There's nothing overstated about it; Babylon 5 is Lord of the Rings In Space.

I think JMS said it best:

There's a fine line between having archetypal similarities and just plain direct similarities. The Hero With a Thousand Faces need not always be Luke Skywalker, as it were. JMS has basically the latter -
There's nothing archetypal in similarity between his Rangers and Tolkein's Rangers, they are Tolkein's rangers.
Basically, his other given examples may be archetypal - proper literary fare like Greek myth and Biblical gospels - but his Tolkein influence is more direct.

Other observations:
"A Call to Arms" has basically a Dungeons & Dragons style plot, with the thief, the mage, and the quest. If one is unfamiliar with that the story may not make a whole lot of sense. "Thirdspace" is Lovecraft - and indeed the Shadows are indebted to Lovecraft - while the Vorlons and the evolution of beings into a higher state which they shepherd is clearly a page from "Childhood's End" - making the Vorlons angels is basically an inversion of making the Overlords demons.
And so on and so on. JMS does not reference or homage, he 'borrows'. One's either fine with that or one's defensive about it, it makes no difference. I'm fine with it honestly; in concoting a potpurri of various geek literature interests with the odd traditional allusion JMS created a much better TV series then he likely would have if he struck out at tried to be completely original, or at least completely archetypal - quality is something that matters more to me than such frames of reference.

What I find fascinating in this whole discussion is that, whenever a
novel comes out, people don't generally go through page by page and say,
"Oh, I think Niven was ripping off/drawing from "Lensman" when he did this
part."

That happens far more often than he seems to believe. There's a little bit of Lensman in Babylon 5 as well, of course.
 
Last edited:
A character on "Jeremiah" even quoted a passage from "1984" in one episode. Orwell surely had a profound impact on JMS... just like Tolkien.

Wasn't that in the episode about the librarian who couldn't read? That wasn't a JMS episode; it was the one Sam Egan episode I actually liked.

Jan

Nope, I was thinking about the Season 2 premiere.

A captured Marcus was commenting on the Valhalla Sector's methods and plans by referencing Orwell.
 
And so on and so on. JMS does not reference or homage, he 'borrows'. One's either fine with that or one's defensive about it, it makes no difference. I'm fine with it honestly; in concoting a potpurri of various geek literature interests with the odd traditional allusion JMS created a much better TV series then he likely would have if he struck out at tried to be completely original, or at least completely archetypal - quality is something that matters more to me than such frames of reference.

Joe actually described this somewhere in one of the script books. I can't remember the quote off hand, but he was talking about how he wanted to use a particular scene from a movie in one of his projects but hadn't found a place to put it yet. Tarantino writes in a similar way, adapting scenes from movies here and there to make a new whole, and the end result is quite good IMO. But it's not about taking a story one-for-one; it's a multiplexing of stories and life experiences into a new creature. If a certain story speaks to you, you can write it in a new way that isn't "borrowing" but it still cuts in to the very same themes. There is an explicit list of literary/television/movie influences that Joe wanted to use for B5 in one of his earliest Babylon 5 documents that is pretty interesting to think about, but a couple of them are definite spoilers for some later plots:

Casablanca, Dune, Lord of the Rings, The Prisoner, Gone with the Wind, Civil War, [the Kennedy Assassination], Foundation, Lensman
 
Last edited:
I've actually had it for over a week, I just took some time off to get some college work out of the way. Luckily things are dying down a small bit now so I should be starting season 2 tonight. :)
 
Points of Departure (***)

Hmm, not the grandiose start I was hoping for after Chrysalis, but what could JMS do? His lead actor left at a pivotal moment in the series and he had to introduce a new station commander and try to get us all to accept him in 42 minutes, all this after hinting in Babylon Squared that Sinclair was going to be a big deal in the future of this show. So while this episode didn't explain what is going on with Delenn, and we still don't know where G'Kar went, and we don't know the political ramifications of the Earth President being assassinated, and nothing new happened with Garibaldi... I can't blame this episode for dropping all that stuff to introduce Sheridan.

As for Sheridan, I like him, he has let me with a much more positive impression that Sinclair did after his first episode. I guess part of the problem with Sinclair is that I knew he would be leaving, and the episodes that focused on him tended to deal with the mystery of the Battle of the Line rather than exploring him as a person, so I never clicked with him. Sheridan on the other hand doesn't feel like a mystery, he feels like a character front and centre, and while he discusses his actions during the war, and this episode's plot focuses on that era of his life, it doesn't feel like this is all there is to him. And I like that he's more... bitter than Sinclair when it comes to the Minbari. Sinclair seemed to get along with everyone, it seems like Sheridan is going to bring a bit more conflict to the show.

However, I could be very wrong about this, I've only known the guy for a few minutes. :lol:

The one piece of the overall plot that did move along was the revelation of what "really" happened at the Battle of the Line, and boy was I underwhelmed by that. I was expecting something Earth-shattering, the revelation that humans have in them something I don't believe in wasn't what I was hoping for. Anything that validates Soul Hunter as an episode in a bad thing in my book. I just don't buy that the Minbari insisted on making Sinclair the commander of Babylon 5 because he was the first human the Grey Council encountered, I have to believe that there is something more to it than that.

I'm a bit rusty, I nearly forgot the Scott Bakula counter! :eek:

Scott Bakula: 17
 
Suffice it to say that Lennier's account is a simplification. That explanation was enough for the Religious Caste, but as you've seen, the Warrior Caste wasn't much more keen on it than you were. There are secrets even among the Minbari.
 
Suffice it to say that Lennier's account is a simplification.
And more to the point, there is a much more scientific explanation to be deduced later on. I don't believe in souls either, but once you get the whole story, it'll make sense.
 
At this stage, the point is that this is what the Grey Council believed. To the Minbari, souls are very real and absolutely CENTRAL to their beliefs that informs their view of the entire universe (you'll hear about that later) so it's something they take VERY seriously, even if most humans think it's utterly ludicrous.

None of the other castes were told what Lennier revealed precisely because none of the castes were liable to accept or even believe it and doing so would cause immense turmoil.
 
At this stage, the point is that this is what the Grey Council believed. To the Minbari, souls are very real and absolutely CENTRAL to their beliefs that informs their view of the entire universe (you'll hear about that later) so it's something they take VERY seriously, even if most humans think it's utterly ludicrous.

In the comic that shows what Sinclair was up to concurrently with this episode, he's informed of what happened, as well. Later, talking with President Clark privately, Clark pretty much says, "Yeah, we thought it was a bunch of bullshit, but it got them to stop killing us, so we weren't exactly going to argue."
 
One thing I didn't like about "Points of Departure" is to the extent John Sheridan was a very unsubtly reworked version of Jeffrey Sinclair. Granted, it wasn't the first time JMS had to scramble to replace an actor with a very similar character - there were no less than four instances of that in the first season alone; and suspiciously both first officers had a thing for bending the rules to plant fresh coffee. But Sinclair wasn't a guy who appeared in the pilot or an episode or two, he was the lead character of the show for a whole year.

And what do we get? Well, Jeffrey Sinclair, the lead character in a show by Joe Straczynski, is replaced by John Sheridan. Sinclair has a history with Garibaldi, Sheridan has a history with Ivanova. Sinclair was a hero of the last stand of the Minbari War, Sheridan won the only successful battle of that war. And so on - he even looks like a younger, fresher-faced Sinclair.

A minority opinion perhaps, but there wasn't really a point in the series where I ever came around to accepting Sheridan as a replacement for Sinclair, and I wasn't even a big fan of Sinclair to begin with.

The other thing was something JMS of course could not avoid; Lennier dropping the Battle of the Line plot abruptly, ignominiously and with reams of dialogue. With Sinclair exiting stage left it no longer really has the significance it once did.
 
Revelations (***½)

After watching this episode it really reinforces how Points of Departure put everything on hold in order to introduce Sheridan because all four plots from Chrysalis (G'Kar searching for something, Delenn in her cocoon, Garibaldi in a coma and the assassination of the Earth President) come into play here. All these plots are interesting on some level but none of them are all that shocking, at least not for me. G'Kar coming to the realisation that there's another race, an evil one that threatens them all, is important but it's not a huge revelation for me because I've known about the Shadows for years. I don't know what they are or why they're returning, but this episode didn't delve into any of that.

Then there's the revelation that President Clark may have been complicit in the death of President Santiago as some sort of power grab by the Psi Corps, but even that wasn't a surprise. They made a point in Chrysalis to mention that VP Clark left the Presidential tour for health reasons, so that raised a red flag right there, and we were warned back in season 1 that the Psi Corps want political control. The final revelation, that Delenn has become half-human, or something, also wasn't shocking because I've seen pictures of her looking like that for a long time. I was hoping for a bit more than her changing appearance, although there will probably be more to it than that in the future.

One thing I really enjoyed about this episode was the Sheridan plot about mourning his wife two years after her death, it was one of those moments where I clicked with the character and, godsdamnit, I felt a little emotional. :weep: I really enjoyed this plot... right up until the point where his sister gives him a recording of his wife that says everything he has wanted to hear for two years. :brickwall: It was a complete Get Out of Jail Free card and it nearly ruined all the good stuff that came before. Life doesn't let us off the hook like that two years after losing someone we care about, no, life prefers to rip our heads off and defecate down our throats.

By the way, I received an email from my ex of two years yesterday. She wants to know if we can be friends again. Isn't that nice? :)

Gods, I hate my life sometimes.

Scott Bakula: 19
 
Suffice it to say that Lennier's account is a simplification.
And more to the point, there is a much more scientific explanation to be deduced later on. I don't believe in souls either, but once you get the whole story, it'll make sense.


I do, on the other hand. And one thing I enjoyed about Babylon 5 is that not only did it take faith and it being an important, powerful force seriously, but the idea that we are more than bodies seriously as well.

And that it didn't feel the need to come up with some technobabble "explanation" for everything. There are mysteries.

That's it.

At this stage, the point is that this is what the Grey Council believed. To the Minbari, souls are very real and absolutely CENTRAL to their beliefs that informs their view of the entire universe (you'll hear about that later) so it's something they take VERY seriously, even if most humans think it's utterly ludicrous.

I wouldn't say "most". I'd say the view on the matter of souls among humans varied greatly, depending on who you talk to. Kinda like how it is, here and now in our present times.

A minority opinion perhaps, but there wasn't really a point in the series where I ever came around to accepting Sheridan as a replacement for Sinclair, and I wasn't even a big fan of Sinclair to begin with.

I did, because all those things you mention are surface things. When it came down to the meat of the characters, especially as we got to know Sheridan and the details of both his background and who he was, he was quite different from Sinclair.

The only real similarities, besides their "hero" statuses from the war was that they both had no problem bucking the authorities if they thought it was the right thing and/or suited the mission.

Other than that, their personalities and interpersonal styles, totally different. Further, how the Minbari and Earth regarded them, polar opposites.

BTW, the idea of both of them having a friend in the staff of B5 is a little much to pick on. The military is a small world and you WILL run into people you know, again and again. Further, you will run into people who know well the people you know.

Happens to me all the time.

Revelations (***½)

After watching this episode it really reinforces how Points of Departure put everything on hold in order to introduce Sheridan because all four plots from Chrysalis (G'Kar searching for something, Delenn in her cocoon, Garibaldi in a coma and the assassination of the Earth President) come into play here. All these plots are interesting on some level but none of them are all that shocking, at least not for me. G'Kar coming to the realisation that there's another race, an evil one that threatens them all, is important but it's not a huge revelation for me because I've known about the Shadows for years. I don't know what they are or why they're returning, but this episode didn't delve into any of that.

Then there's the revelation that President Clark may have been complicit in the death of President Santiago as some sort of power grab by the Psi Corps, but even that wasn't a surprise. They made a point in Chrysalis to mention that VP Clark left the Presidential tour for health reasons, so that raised a red flag right there, and we were warned back in season 1 that the Psi Corps want political control. The final revelation, that Delenn has become half-human, or something, also wasn't shocking because I've seen pictures of her looking like that for a long time. I was hoping for a bit more than her changing appearance, although there will probably be more to it than that in the future.

One thing I really enjoyed about this episode was the Sheridan plot about mourning his wife two years after her death, it was one of those moments where I clicked with the character and, godsdamnit, I felt a little emotional. :weep: I really enjoyed this plot... right up until the point where his sister gives him a recording of his wife that says everything he has wanted to hear for two years. :brickwall: It was a complete Get Out of Jail Free card and it nearly ruined all the good stuff that came before. Life doesn't let us off the hook like that two years after losing someone we care about, no, life prefers to rip our heads off and defecate down our throats.

By the way, I received an email from my ex of two years yesterday. She wants to know if we can be friends again. Isn't that nice? :)

Gods, I hate my life sometimes.

Scott Bakula: 19


I'd say, based on my own life, life does a little of both. But you need both to grow. As for Sheridan...keep watching.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I did, because all those things you mention are surface things.
Basically because first I didn't want to venture into spoiler territory,
like his relationship with Delenn, which is also picking off where Sinclair left off, or his role in the conspiracy against EarthGov, which is building off the tensions Sinclair had with them in the first season, Catherine Sakai - who replaced Caroline - is replaced by Anna Sheridan, and on and on and on.
And secondly it was an impression of "Points of Departure", and from that all I've got are surface things, and those surface things point to Sinclair with a new coat of paint. Substantively speaking I never got over that impression...

although in fairness Marcus Cole is also Sinclair. He's where Sinclair's literary bent was shunted off to.

Other than that, their personalities and interpersonal styles, totally different. Further, how the Minbari and Earth regarded them, polar opposites.
Which as inversions go isn't much of one, because given Sinclair's close relationship with Delenn there will still walls between them as the Battle of the Line plot made clear,
and he winds up basically having the same level of standing with the Minbari Sinclair had been leaning in; close to Delenn and the religious caste and all that jazz.

BTW, the idea of both of them having a friend in the staff of B5 is a little much to pick on.
By itself, of course not. But when it's a piece of a larger puzzle? Then yeah, it's a fair target. JMS was losing this long history relationship Sinclair and Garibaldi had, and giving Sheridan the same relationship with the same character was just gosh darn it too obvious, which left Franklin and Ivanova.
 
One thing I didn't like about "Points of Departure" is to the extent John Sheridan was a very unsubtly reworked version of Jeffrey Sinclair.
<snip>
And what do we get? Well, Jeffrey Sinclair, the lead character in a show by Joe Straczynski, is replaced by John Sheridan. Sinclair has a history with Garibaldi, Sheridan has a history with Ivanova. Sinclair was a hero of the last stand of the Minbari War, Sheridan won the only successful battle of that war. And so on - he even looks like a younger, fresher-faced Sinclair.

Sorry, Kegg, I'm afraid you're reaching *way* too far for a criticism here. Captain Happy resembling the ever-dour Sinclair?!? I don't think so! They're both tall. That's really about the extent of it.

In a memo describing the character (written May 1, 1994 - two and a half months before writing "Points") JMS described the new captain as
JMS in Script Book Three said:
Middle 30s, attractive, upbeat,
charismatic. The kind of person who could
charm G'Kar out of his socks without him
even knowing it. Where Sinclair is
rigidly by-the-book and haunted, Strider
is flexible and optimistic. He's a little
more Machiavellian, in the good sense of
the word; always one step ahead of
everybody else. He is able to balance a
sense of humor with being a credible
authority figure.
.
Archetype: Pierce Brosnan, or a young Sean
Connery. Could be American, but an
English or Irish actor with unimpeachable
acting credentials, classically trained,​
would be a real find.

You'll be happy to know the placeholder name that JMS gave the new Captain, though: John Strider. However, the link to Lord of the Rings is small.
I chose Strider as a temporary name because I’m a Lord of the Rings fan, and
that image was a good one for me to hold in mind during the writing, but I always
intended to change the name later, once we’d cast the actor and I could figure out
what name fit. The initials JS would remain, however, because…well, that’s my​
way of signing my work.

Jan
 
Sorry, Kegg, I'm afraid you're reaching *way* too far for a criticism here.
:vulcan:

Surely you jest. Must I rather tendentiously evoke the little J.S. thing again? JMS is pretty consistent in B5 with replacing characters with reworked versions of the same character, with varying degrees of success, and Sinclair to Sheridan is just one of the most prominent examples.

That's not the same thing as saying Sheridan is the same character as Sinclair. As observed, he's been reworked. He has less of Sinclair's intellectual bent, but even that in part is necessary to explain the logic of him being selected for the job given the great importance the Minbari placed on Sinclair's selection in the first season (the implication being there were dozens of top brass guys eager to get the post - so why are they all passed over again? Well, uh, hero of the war, snub it to the Minbari!)

Even the fact he was Santiago's second pick wants to connect him to the late president in some way, who of course was responsible for appointing Sinclair.

You'll be happy to know the placeholder name that JMS gave the new Captain, though: John Strider.
I knew that already, actually.

The initials JS would remain, however, because…well, that’s my
way of signing my work.
Matthew Gideon and David Martel may beg to differ on that point.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top