Maybe it's a Katra thing.
765874 - Unification
- Thread starter jackoverfull
- Start date
Interesting that Urbach says this is the last we'll see of these shorts when the clips and behind-the-scenes shots indicate they've shot a lot more material featuring Colt, Spock, Saavik, and more.
Exclusive: “Unification” Producer Breaks Down OTOY’s Star Trek Short Giving Kirk And Spock A Final Goodbye
TrekMovie talks to Jules Urbach for a shot-by-shot breakdown of the short film that has fans buzzing.trekmovie.com
Maybe they'll make a coffee table book next.
Book and book! What is book?
It's true that there appear to be loads of deleted scenes and no clear plan to use them, but if you're saying the series is ending the article actually says:
I'd love to see the deleted material from this and the previous shorts in any case.
Not to speak for him too much as he posts here, but he doesn't say there will be no more shorts. He says that Unification is the end of the story. He hopes to be able to tell the middle parts.
Edit: My bad, Cap'n Calhoun already said as much.
Actually I meant that Unification was a fitting closing scene for Kirk and Spock's narrative from our story's perspective, but not the end of us creating more content to fill in everything else that happens before then.
Eh, in the end, it's all wibbly-wobbly-timey-wimey-Stuff. ^^
Huh? From the article;
“He does say “there is absolutely more we want to tell,” so he is hoping they do follow up with more for “the middle part of this piece that connect the beginning and end that we have shown so far is something we would want to explore.”
Much appreciated for the clarification, thank you!
She was name dropped in Strange New Worlds.
Kelvin Carol appeared in Star Trek Into Darkness.
I hoped it wasn't the sunset they were watching, but the advancing Nexus, where they could journey together/adventure together regardless of time.
That was mentioned already. They started arguing that she doesn't count.
They're all Witwer.
This is sort of an interesting microcosm case study in how misinformation can come into existence and how it spreads. I’ve seen several people here and elsewhere saying that Shatner filmed scenes for this. I think it’s partially because OTOY to some degree deliberately obfuscated the truth of the matter by for example listing Shatner in the credits. Or by releasing that interview with him at the same time. But then I also think another factor is that people are genuinely confused about what the effects people have actually achieved in this. At this point nearly everyone has seen de-aging SFX in movies, TV shows or even just by using an app on their phone. But the kind of makeup plus flawless AI effects on top are still relatively novel. And then I think what’s also a factor is that people just really want it to be true. It would be so cool to know that Shatner played Kirk one more time for this. I wouldn’t be surprised to see this pop up again and again over the next couple of years.
I have to say I laughed when I would see people say "You could just TELL that it was Shatner."
One of the remarkable things about Witwer's performance was that right away you could tell that it was Kirk.
One of the remarkable things about Witwer's performance was that right away you could tell that it was Kirk.
You could tell it was Kirk, but my mother, a big shatner fan, was not sold on him being shatner. She says that some of his microexpressions are missing.
Similar threads
