• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Will the uniforms change?

No they didn’t. STC was produced in 2013. ENT went off the air in 2005.

Touche.

Then it was Phase II/New Voyages. The thing was Paramount never bothered to return the uniforms they loaned. They went missing when the show went off the air.
 
IIRC, the old production report from Paramount posted on StarTrek.com back in the day for In a Mirror Darkly said the TOS uniforms worn by the main cast in the episode were tailor made, while the ones worn by the background extras portraying the Defiant's dead crew were taken from Trials and Tribble-Ations.
 
Touche.

Then it was Phase II/New Voyages. The thing was Paramount never bothered to return the uniforms they loaned. They went missing when the show went off the air.

Do you have a source for this? Because I would think that uniforms made for completely different people would look ill-fitting on the ENT cast (just like the DS9 uniforms did on the TNG cast in Generations), but they all look fine.
 
The lavender uniforms were paid for with the First Contact budget, DS9 probably only had to make new uniforms for Sisko, Dax, Bashir and O'Brien (Worf got his from FC too), the rest were freebies. So DS9 got all of the First Contact uniforms and Voyager got all of the DS9 uniforms, it was a win for both shows, had they made new DS9/Voyager uniforms the money for that would have come out their budgets.
This is not 100% correct. The hero uniforms for DS9 post rapture are not the precisely same design as the hero FC uniforms.*
Each actor needed their costume tailored individually and there were some subtle design changes, probably because it was easier to produce than the movie costumes.

What DS9 got for free was basically the pattern and design work which was all part of the FC prepoduction costs. I'm sure there was some costume sharing going on, especially for the background performers, but they didn't just inherit the hero costumes wholesale.


*to be fair, most of the changes would be practically invisible on SD screens, and it's mostly in the fine detailing.
 
Do you have a source for this? Because I would think that uniforms made for completely different people would look ill-fitting on the ENT cast (just like the DS9 uniforms did on the TNG cast in Generations), but they all look fine.

I thought it was a Trekyards episode with James Cawley, however the only thing that a quick Google search pulled up is:


"Pieces of the sets, and some of the costumes, have been borrowed by Paramount for their Enterprise series."
 
The inherent problem with the production making or borrowing TOS sets is that it goes completely against their modus that ‘this is what it always looked like.’
That's the inherent, massive failure of SNW as a concept; the "always looked that way" agenda not only clashes with TOS, but the natural, evolutionary design approach that transformed TOS into the TOS movies, and the movies into TNG's look. There's no way to sell the idea that SNW's look is over a century earlier than TNG. It does not work no matter how much some would love to sell that to themselves.
 
That's the inherent, massive failure of SNW as a concept; the "always looked that way" agenda not only clashes with TOS, but the natural, evolutionary design approach that transformed TOS into the TOS movies, and the movies into TNG's look. There's no way to sell the idea that SNW's look is over a century earlier than TNG. It does not work no matter how much some would love to sell that to themselves.
Yeah...no.
 
That's the inherent, massive failure of SNW as a concept; the "always looked that way" agenda not only clashes with TOS, but the natural, evolutionary design approach that transformed TOS into the TOS movies, and the movies into TNG's look. There's no way to sell the idea that SNW's look is over a century earlier than TNG. It does not work no matter how much some would love to sell that to themselves.
The TOS/Movies/TNG evolution was because those looks were developed in the 60s/70s/80s respectively. TMP looks like a 70s movie because that's when it was made for example, not because of when it was set, it could have taken place during TOS and would have looked mostly the same. They would have never reused the 60s look.
 
That's the inherent, massive failure of SNW as a concept; the "always looked that way" agenda not only clashes with TOS, but the natural, evolutionary design approach that transformed TOS into the TOS movies, and the movies into TNG's look. There's no way to sell the idea that SNW's look is over a century earlier than TNG. It does not work no matter how much some would love to sell that to themselves.
At no point has visual continuity affected the story continuity.
 
The TOS/Movies/TNG evolution was because those looks were developed in the 60s/70s/80s respectively. TMP looks like a 70s movie because that's when it was made for example, not because of when it was set, it could have taken place during TOS and would have looked mostly the same. They would have never reused the 60s look.
Its not the time the series/movies were produced; it was a conscious effort to show a believable, logical design lineage from one era to the next. That's why next to no one questioned the evolution from TOS-TOS/M-TNG--the internal visual language made sense right out of the gates. SNW is in no way some believable design / historical predecessor to TOS/TOS/M/TNG.
 
Its not the time the series/movies were produced; it was a conscious effort to show a believable, logical design lineage from one era to the next. That's why next to no one questioned the evolution from TOS-TOS/M-TNG--the internal visual language made sense right out of the gates. SNW is in no way some believable design / historical predecessor to TOS/TOS/M/TNG.
Not seeing anything "believable or logical" in the TOS-TOS/M-TNG design linage. The all stand as isolates to me. Especially the uniforms. Each one throws out the baby and the bathwater.
 
Not seeing anything "believable or logical" in the TOS-TOS/M-TNG design linage. The all stand as isolates to me. Especially the uniforms. Each one throws out the baby and the bathwater.

I'm talking about more than just uniforms. The Starfleet ships' exteriors/interiors are the strongest example of a natural design lineage from one production to another that clearly said the generations were in the same universe.
 
I'm talking about more than just uniforms. The Starfleet ships' exteriors/interiors are the strongest example of a natural design lineage from one production to another that clearly said the generations were in the same universe.
Still not seeing it. They seem to go their own ways for the most part. LCARS looks nothing like the jellies from TOS or even the the Xmas lights of TMP. The uniforms in TMP are a major departure from TOS. The TWOK ones that followed are a departure from TMP. They're almost the opposite of both TMP and TOS. TNG's seems to drifts back to TMP in away but goes for bold color and asymmetry. Of course on the ship front The Refit is a reimagining of TOS's Enterprise. Still it takes liberties. TNG reshapes the components of a Trek ship. The primary hull, the secondary hull and the nacelles are totally different.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top