• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spock News

Whenever I see Vulcan's moons in TMP, I see pineapple and a cherry.

As far as I'm concerned TMP overrules "The Man Trap". I believe what I see not what I hear. And sometimes Pluto is a planet, sometimes it's a moon. So maybe in 2266 Vulcan's moon was a planet -- and what the Hell am I talking about?
:wtf::wtf::wtf:

Now I got dragged into a canon debate about Vulcan's moons! :angryrazz::angryrazz::angryrazz:
Dwarf planet.
Is the bigger object Delta Vega?
 
I prefer DIS, which is what I use. It keeps with VOY and ENT, both of which are abbreviations based upon the first three letters of the one-word title after Discovery...
Since this conversation has derailed anyway:
DIS, DSC and STD are IMO all perfectly matching abbrevieations. It used to be the first three letters of each word, but that obviously changed for VOY, though probably only because "STV" was already taken at that point. I use DIS, because it matches with ENT and VOY...
In terms of abbreviations, three letters max: TOS, TAS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT.
But it isn't VOY...it's VGR.:whistle:

Yeah. The problem with "The Cages" Spock is that his portrayal there falls under "early installment weirdness":
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/EarlyInstallmentWeirdness
So then, following your line of reasoning here...why wouldn't the Enterprise's configuration and uniforms in "The Cage" fall under the exact same caveat?:evil:

Reading this thread, I don't know that I agree with the definition of revision that has cropped up over the course of this discussion, particularly concerning Burnham and her relationship to Spock. Revisionism would be to revise, to change extant detail.

What the writers so far have done is infill, or provide new detail that fills in blanks without contradicting existing detail. The two are very separate, and Burnham as a character is firmly invention, not revision.

ETA: The creator's intent also shouldn't generally matter here. It's not germane to what's on screen. If it were, we'd have to accept that Spock is related to, say, a flamingo, if a writer had ever said that or some other nonsense. A principle of criticism tends to be that authorial intent is immaterial to content presented.
I quite agree with your thrust, but I would say adding in new information that recontextualizes our view of what we've already seen is still a form of revisionism. But that's only natural, and so far, I very much enjoy the revisions they've made! Spock's "family arc" has only continued to gain richness and depth as "Yesteryear" (TAS), films III-V, "Sarek" and "Unification" (TNG), and now DSC (particularly "Battle At The Binary Stars" and "Lethe") have all in turn revised our view of the scenario we were initially presented with in "Journey To Babel" (TOS), which itself had been gradually built up to from the beginning of the show.

I definitely don't want to see this series handed over to Spock from Burnham. But I have little fear that is what they have in store for us. They seem to know what they're about, to me.

You mean in the same way that Spock told Uhura "Vulcan has no moon..." in TOS S1 - "The Man Trap" yet in ST:TMP (overseen by the great bird GR himself) in 1979, we get this shot of Vulcan:
vulcan-sttmp.jpg

^^^
Tell, me what are those TWO things in the upper right corner? ;)
"Lethe" (DSC) finally gave us the answer. That's neighboring Eridani D and its moon, where Amanda took Michael for a book exchange on her tenth birthday. (Seems likely to me, anyway. Why else would they put it back after the Director's Edition removed it?)

discovery1x06_0065.jpg

themotionpicture0086.jpg


It was there in "Yesteryear" (TAS) as well!
yesteryearhd0148.jpg


(Of course, the old joke used to be that Vulcan has no moon...because Vulcan is a moon!)

-MMoM:D
 
Last edited:
I can't believe Kutzman is gonna make Spock emotional. He said Spock will be there with all his characteristics and style. But at the same time very different from the Spock we all know. An earlier more emotional Spock..

Talk about revisionism. Not good
I was hopeful till I read that!
 
I can't believe Kutzman is gonna make Spock emotional. He said Spock will be there with all his characteristics and style. But at the same time very different from the Spock we all know. An earlier more emotional Spock..

Talk about revisionism. Not good
I was hopeful till I read that!
Huh? I guess you forgot this shot from TOS S1 "The Cage"/"The Menagerie":
K3Bwn.jpg


Or if you want the scene in full context:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
^^^
Spock WAS more emotional in the "Pike Era". ;)
 
Yeah. In the novel, Desperate Hours, it shows you the reasons why he changes from the Cage version to the TOS version we all love.
Since this is set after that, he should be more like the TOS version.
 
Yeah. In the novel, Desperate Hours, it shows you the reasons why he changes from the Cage version to the TOS version we all love.
Since this is set after that, he should be more like the TOS version.

They're not going to follow up everything from the novels. Stop acting like they're equal.

If the show runners want to tell their own version as to why, they will.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe Kutzman is gonna make Spock emotional. He said Spock will be there with all his characteristics and style. But at the same time very different from the Spock we all know. An earlier more emotional Spock..

Like anything else, it comes down to the quality of the writing. Based on season one, I have my doubts they will be able to successfully pull it off. But, I like what Kurtzman did with Spock in the first two Abrams films.

So, we'll see.
 
Like anything else, it comes down to the quality of the writing. Based on season one, I have my doubts they will be able to successfully pull it off. But, I like what Kurtzman did with Spock in the first two Abrams films.

So, we'll see.
Season 1 also had a rough start. Have any of the writers changed from Season 1?
 
(Of course, the old joke used to be that Vulcan has no moon...because Vulcan is a moon!)
Well, I think that it would match the visual evidence better. The big planet is a gas giant, and Vulcan and the small planetoid are its moons. I'm no expert, but I have hard time imagining that two planets in separate orbits would come that close, or if it is a twin-planet arrangement, the moon could maintain any reasonable orbit with them.
 
"Lethe" (DSC) finally gave us the answer. That's neighboring Eridani D and its moon, where Amanda took Michael for a book exchange on her tenth birthday. (Seems likely to me, anyway. Why else would they put it back after the Director's Edition removed it?)

discovery1x06_0065.jpg

themotionpicture0086.jpg


It was there in "Yesteryear" (TAS) as well!
yesteryearhd0148.jpg


(Of course, the old joke used to be that Vulcan has no moon...because Vulcan is a moon!)

-MMoM:D

Thanks!
 
Spock's always been emotional.
Spock is half human, while he has embraced his Vulcan heritage it would be, I dare say, illogical for him to deny that he has a human half. But working with humans I think brought so many challenges to him. I think he enjoyed working in the science dept (working his way up to heading it and being science officer and then first officer) but 'putting up' with emotional humans and trying to block those emotions from affecting him from a telepathic and maybe empathic view was a learning curve for him. I think it wasn't until he made friends with Jim and McCoy (and with other crew like Uhura and Sulu and Scotty, etc) that he felt like he had a home on the Enterprise and was part of a family.
 
We have Spock from TOS, more toward the logical Vulcan side.

We have Spock from Kelvinverse, more toward the emotional Human side.

Kurtzman says Spock in Discovery is going to be very, very different.

Considering the two 'versions' that we already have, what is left?

What is left to make him so different? Different from what?
 
We have Spock from TOS, more toward the logical Vulcan side.

We have Spock from Kelvinverse, more toward the emotional Human side.

Kurtzman says Spock in Discovery is going to be very, very different.

Considering the two 'versions' that we already have, what is left?

What is left to make him so different? Different from what?
Different than fan expectation.
 
I ' m pretty meh on DSC, but I think they should let it be its own thing. Al most seems like tptb don't think it strong enough without all the TOS stuff.

i know I a m in the minority, but I don' t really want family dynamics drama/melodrama. I would like strange, new worlds, moral conundrums, what-ifs, allegories, you know, star trek.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top