A bomb of some kind? I don't know how hard it is to make a bomb or something similar but Dyad surely has a fully stocked lab somewhere in that building, if their own lab wasn't sufficient. Or have Mrs S help them, she mentioned a bomb earlier in the episode anyway.
That would be risky, because they wouldn't know for sure what innocent people might be in the room when the device was set off. I'm more comfortable with the use of a weapon that Sarah can choose when and whether to fire.
Or, heck, just have Scott set off the fire alarm or another alarm manually.
Hmm, maybe. I can see how that could've worked, but I don't think it would've been dramatic enough for the climax of the season. So in that sense I can see your point about the writers contriving it for its impact, although I still think you were a little harsh in how you expressed it.
The flamethrower was more of a joke. But that link said that the risk of fire in such a situation is still extremely small. So while it justifies the presence of a fire extinguisher, I don't think that this miniscule risk would have that much influence on a plan meant to save Sarah from a much much higher risk. So I don't think that the taser can be skipped.
Well, I think it would've been a lot harder to get that past security than a fire extinguisher. As for getting it from Alison, the writers seemed to prefer to keep Alison off in her own storyline this year.
I still think you're underestimating Scott's resolve or capability to overcome his inner blocks in order to save Sarah. But we've already been over that and I did mean for the needle to be used by Sarah when I mentioned that idea.
I just think that people who have no real-life experience with violence tend to overestimate how easy it is to engage in it, because a lifetime of fiction has given us the impression that anyone can turn into an action hero at a moment's notice. I've read articles and quotes from people who have real experience with violence, and they've talked about how much harder it is than you'd think from TV and movies.
Scott already freed one of Sarah's arms by almost completely loosening that restraint. That's the only reason she was even able to use the pencil-launcher. It's not much of a stretch that he could have done the same thing with the other arm too.
It's a question of where the threshold of detectability is. Loosening one restraint enough that she can work her own wrist out of it is subtle enough that there's a good chance it could be overlooked. Completely releasing a restraint, or repeating the action on both arms, would be more likely to get noticed. Any action taken before the distraction kicked in had to be kept to a minimum.
(Though I see another even simpler solution. Just have Scott distract Rachel's attention in some conventional manner, long enough for Sarah to free herself and knock Rachel out)
Except it doesn't seem that Scott was supposed to be there, given that he was hiding behind a mask. And Rachel has met him, I'm pretty sure, so she might've recognized him and known that something was wrong, which is the last thing they wanted.
It's not like the pencil-launcher is any more useful in that regard, it's still a blink-of-an-eye single-shot weapon that can only take out one person and the only distraction it creates is in doing that. I don't think a person falling down because of getting hit by a pencil would create much more distraction than a person falling down because of getting stabbed with a needle.
But the former is more loud, abrupt, and shocking. And again, I think TV conditions us to assume that everyone would react to violence calmly like a trained soldier or police officer would. Realistically, there'd be a lot more confusion and panic and shouting and "What the hell was that" and it would be a real mess.
And if we're going to use those priorities, a taser - which can be used multiple times - or, again, a smoke bomb (or a noise bomb or a flash bomb) - which would have created way more distraction - seem like much better options to me.
A taser needs to be reloaded after each use, doesn't it? Well, I guess I have seen one (Alison's?) that was loaded with two cartridges with separate triggers.
And I still think a smoke or flash bomb would've impaired both sides equally and thus not been much of an advantage. Not much of an escape if you can't orient yourself to find the door.
The writers set the timing whatever way they want.
Yes, and again, they wanted to make it difficult and dramatic, not smooth and easy.
And since we've now really gone hugely into detail, I feel like I have to make clear that I don't really care that much about the exact specifics of the mechanics of the plan (neither is it even my main criticism anymore, actually). I just care that it doesn't break my suspension of disbelief. It's not always a purely logical thing, it's a feeling.
I think we're both getting tired of this at this point. Of course there's always more than one way to put a scene or an episode together, and sometimes the reason for doing a scene a certain way is ineffable. Sometimes it's just that that's the way they happened to go instead of doing something else. I just don't think it's fair to assume there was a negative motivation behind anything you don't personally agree with.