Cuz if Sith can just reform themselves through nothing more than will power and their basic common decency, wow, that really makes Anakin look bad!![]()
Finally saw Massacre and Bounty - I'm liking where they're taking Ventress because plain old Sith can be a bit tedious with their one-note villainy.
I wonder how "canonical" it is that she seems to be able to shrug off the grip of the dark side just because, I guess, she's a decent person underneath it all? (There's no reason she had to interpret the massacre of the Nightsisters in a "good" way and become a more unselfish person. She could easily have allowed it to embitter her further and destroy any vestige of humanity.)
The Mortis Arc depicted the dark side as having a fearsome, addictive grasp that goes beyond mere circumstance or personality, and can exert control over even a really nice person like Ahsoka.
Shouldn't the dark side be "fighting for control" a bit harder? The issue of her morality seems identical to what you'd expect for a merely normal person, having to do with their personal experiences and character, rather than someone who might need to fight to some degree or other with an external, mystical factor.
Cuz if Sith can just reform themselves through nothing more than will power and their basic common decency, wow, that really makes Anakin look bad!Ventress endured traumatic personal loss and instead of it making her worse, it made her a better person!
Temis the Vorta said:Cuz if Sith can just reform themselves through nothing more than will power and their basic common decency, wow, that really makes Anakin look bad!
Waitaminute - because she was incompetent, she had the opportunity to escape the clutches of the dark side, and if she'd been better at her job, she would have been doomed? The dark side is picky and only selects the best?Ventress was never a Sith and lacked the ability to be one.
If she had been able to boot Dooku out of his place as One of the Two, then would he have had the chance to escape the dark side (assuming he has that in him, which he may not), and Ventress would have been utterly trapped?It was the Rule of Two that prevented her from becoming one.
After decades of mayhem, and only because his son was threatened. That doesn't impress me - even very evil people can be self-sacrificing to blood relatives and members of their own narrowly defined tribe, because the closer you are related, the more your own self-interest spills over into the self-interest of another person.
The true test of altruism is willingness to help strangers, who you have zero investment in. Ventress was far more unselfish than Vader - she was considerate towards a pack of strangers who weren't related to her and gave her no particular reason to be loyal, just the opposite. In her shoes, I doubt I would have been so altruistic as to give them their share of the loot.
This raises the question of why this story isn't about Ventress. As a character, she's demonstrated "stature" - some outstanding ability that makes them worth telling a story about. I still haven't seen much evidence of Anakin's stature, and he can't show the strength of character that Ventress has, and still have the story make any sense.
Waitaminute - because she was incompetent, she had the opportunity to escape the clutches of the dark side, and if she'd been better at her job, she would have been doomed? The dark side is picky and only selects the best?Ventress was never a Sith and lacked the ability to be one.
That actually does make sense - then Anakin's character isn't really the issue. It's that he's a juicy prize for the dark side, being the Chosen One. He was always dooooomed. (However, I'm far from certain any of this was intended by the writers.)
In that case, Anakin's "stature" stems entirely from the fact that he is the Chosen One, and of keen interest to the dark side, which doesn't go for chumps.
If she had been able to boot Dooku out of his place as One of the Two, then would he have had the chance to escape the dark side (assuming he has that in him, which he may not), and Ventress would have been utterly trapped?It was the Rule of Two that prevented her from becoming one.
And Sith or not, she was clearly in the grip of the dark side. She wasn't a nice person, and wanted to be even less nice by becoming a
Sith.
I'd like to see Ventress' turn towards goodness upended by one nasty little temptation after another to cut corners and go back to her old habits, and being cast out into the galaxy on her own would make her more desperate - she's confident now, but isn't she going to regret giving up that case of credits when work dries up and she runs out of money and has to work for nasty types who aren't as gullible as the "dictator" this week, seriously, how does that guy stay dictator when he doesn't have the sense to open the box before paying the bounty hunter?I agree that departing the Dark Side should be a much more difficult thing to do...like trying to get yourself out of quicksand.
Temis the Vorta said:After decades of mayhem, and only because his son was threatened. That doesn't impress me - even very evil people can be self-sacrificing to blood relatives and members of their own narrowly defined tribe, because the closer you are related, the more your own self-interest spills over into the self-interest of another person.
The true test of altruism is willingness to help strangers, who you have zero investment in.
It was the Rule of Two that prevented her from becoming one.
She would had been a sith lord in revans empire.
I don't see Ventress as turning good or being redeemed, she's just sick of being betrayed in the war and wants to escape from it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.