A real shame that they ousted Michael Piller. I loved the Kazon arc, and as a whole I thought season 2 was great.
I love DS9, and have no problems with the way this episode handles genetics/genetic memory/whatever gobbledegook. It's just a bad episode. It's extremely odd that a race would even develop the way they did, needing to steal other men for procreation and such. It just didn't seem plausible as a concept. The techno-babble was fine, and I bought it, but the concept itself is laughable.
I don't see how this contradicts Jem'Hadar, care to expand on that?
Well, I did go into a few reasons why I think its bad, but if you really wanted me to do an in-depth review I certainly would.Saying it's just bad tells us how you feel but not what you think.
Here's the RDM interview where he railed on Voyager: http://www.lcarscom.net/rdm1000118.htm
Not sure if that was posted earlier in this thread or not.
Here's the RDM interview where he railed on Voyager: http://www.lcarscom.net/rdm1000118.htm
Not sure if that was posted earlier in this thread or not.
How so?
I think you just need to accept Anwar that the majority of people disagree with you and that exaggeration is not the way to try and get your point across (i.e. change the entire show every episode)
The show didn't stay true to its premise
So their engineering staff isn't incompetent, that's a problem?-The ship was magically in tip top shape each week, even after destructive battles that heavily damaged the ship.
No, they weren't. What real differences DID the Maquis have from the Feds, once the DMZ and Cardassians were no longer present?-The Maquis fell nearly perfectly into line with Starfleet, despite being the total opposite of Starfleet.
Well, what happened? ST: Nemesis was a flop, Enterprise wasn't very highly regarded and got canned after 4 seasons, they sat on the Franchise for 5 years and then released ST'09. He even predicted that the next series (Enterprise) would be about the past, pre-Kirk.Let’s say the next movie comes out and it’s a colossal flop, and the next series doesn’t make it out of year one, which is unimaginable. That is truly the Titanic situation. Okay, Paramount cuts their losses and fires everybody. They clean out the soundstages; they give up the production offices, and they sit on it for ten years. Then some executive will come in, and say, ‘We still own the rights to that STAR TREK franchise. Let’s get that going again.’ They’ll bring in some people, and they will start it all up again, because that is the nature of a studio. It’s a given that it is going to keep coming back.
I just don't find it plausible that the ship would look brand new after all the battles it's fought and all it's gone through. It should be bruised and scarred (both the interior and the exterior) and supplies should be running out.
The crew should be down in the dumps and depressed. After all, all of their opportunities to get home have been foiled by their very own captain.
A fight for control of the ship would be realistic, especially considering that the Maquis aren't as disciplined and principled as the Starfleet officers.
I could easily see Maquis murdering Starfleet officers in their sleep.
This would also be a great opportunity to examine the Starfleet officers; how do they respond to the Maquis threat? Do they negotiate and make peace with the Maquis like they have been trained to do, or do they throw their principles aside and fight for their life?
In Farscape, Moya goes through nasty stuff and it never changes or shows battle damage. Only once in the entire show do they have to take it to a specialist for repair work.
Deep-Space missions are supposed to last for years (Kirk's was 5 years) away from home and out of touch with Mission Control.
But the Maquis and Feds weren't really enemies in the first place, and the local Maquis Leader (Chakotay) WAS an Ex-Fleeter.
He wasn't even a traitor like Eddington, he formally resigned and THEN joined the Maquis, and he didn't betray secrets or operations in the process. Or go out of his way to antagonize the Feds.
If anything, Chakotay would've been one of the first ones to just say "Look people, we're stuck out here through no fault of anyone. These guys are willing to let bygones be bygones, and frankly they're the only thing we have in the DQ close to a friendly face. We can either work together to try and survive, or we can just ask them to drop us off on the next commerce world, and I'd rather we all stayed here on an advanced Starship."
Janeway made a conscious decision to trap them there based upon her own set of principles
The original Star Trek was indeed a 5 year mission. This is canon from the opening theme, which we should all know by heart:What's this based on again? As I indicated elsewhere in the forum, that was never the intention of the original Star Trek. That was the intention of Star Trek: The Next Generation, but the premise was abandoned early in the first season, after barely being mentioned.Deep-Space missions are supposed to last for years (Kirk's was 5 years) away from home and out of touch with Mission Control.
Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. Its five-year mission: to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before.
That "Burned Moya" thing was what I was talking about.
Yes, there should've been SOME friction but given how the Maquis really didn't have true differences in ideology and organization from Starfleet realistically it wasn't going to be much, nor was it going to last.
No, she didn't. The Array was never a viable option, the silly thing was that some characters (Torres) acted like it WAS.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.