Mark Twain said that from what he'd heard, he'd prefer Heaven for the climate and Hell for the conversation. 

I said that, too.. But I'm not famous.Mark Twain said that from what he'd heard, he'd prefer Heaven for the climate and Hell for the conversation.![]()
Obviously, none of you have been on a date with any beautiful women in quite some time. Or if you have, you have obviously received the same response that the dirty old man from Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In got(when trying to use a few 'questionable pick-up' lines)when he tried to flirt with that lady sitting on the bench.
Judging by the dirty old men content that has been going on in this thread, I wouldn't be surprised.
Is Expo67 for real? His constant admonishments to stay away from dirty thoughts are doing as much if not more than everyone else's posts to keep the thread on that subject. Good going.
It's a lock-down shot with Garrovick coming down the full length of the corridor.Very interesting! I like the use of the wide-angle lens. Lighting is good. Is that a shot with the camera trucking/tracking backward as the Captain walks forward?
Personally, I'd like to stick to the topic at hand. There are other forums for discussing other topics.Gah. Sometimes, I hate TrekBBS. I could deal with a little of this goofing, even if it's rather off-topic and not really something that should be in the forum (and of no interest to me as a woman) but as is typical on this BBS, people have to run a topic into the damned ground. I let it continue even though I said "enough" and that was a mistake on my part. I won't be so stupid next time.
[/grump]
Ouch!One significant problem was that in order to fix problems in Act 3 material was borrowed from Act 4, which left some significant narrative structural problems in the first half of the act that I've been working to resolve.
It's the "borrowing from Peter to pay Paul" problem. Fortunately, it's not insurmountable, and may lead to Act 4 being better than it would have been otherwise. Film/video editing isn't a science, and you always have to deal with things like this.Ouch!One significant problem was that in order to fix problems in Act 3 material was borrowed from Act 4, which left some significant narrative structural problems in the first half of the act that I've been working to resolve.
It's the "borrowing from Peter to pay Paul" problem. Fortunately, it's not insurmountable, and may lead to Act 4 being better than it would have been otherwise. Film/video editing isn't a science, and you always have to deal with things like this.Ouch!One significant problem was that in order to fix problems in Act 3 material was borrowed from Act 4, which left some significant narrative structural problems in the first half of the act that I've been working to resolve.
It's a lock-down shot with Garrovick coming down the full length of the corridor.Very interesting! I like the use of the wide-angle lens. Lighting is good. Is that a shot with the camera trucking/tracking backward as the Captain walks forward?
Personally, I'd like to stick to the topic at hand. There are other forums for discussing other topics.Gah. Sometimes, I hate TrekBBS. I could deal with a little of this goofing, even if it's rather off-topic and not really something that should be in the forum (and of no interest to me as a woman) but as is typical on this BBS, people have to run a topic into the damned ground. I let it continue even though I said "enough" and that was a mistake on my part. I won't be so stupid next time.
[/grump]
That's what I was trying to tell those ungentlemanly-like individuals.
Not really. It's pretty common. Elements in films get rearranged in editing all the time.That's pretty heavy.
Why tar people with "ungentlemanly" instead of just agreeing with the desire to stick to the subject?That's what I was trying to tell those ungentlemanly-like individuals.Personally, I'd like to stick to the topic at hand. There are other forums for discussing other topics.
It's a lock-down shot with Garrovick coming down the full length of the corridor.Very interesting! I like the use of the wide-angle lens. Lighting is good. Is that a shot with the camera trucking/tracking backward as the Captain walks forward?
Not really. It's pretty common. Elements in films get rearranged in editing all the time.That's pretty heavy.
Why to tar people with "ungentlemanly" instead of just agreeing with the desire to stick to the subject?That's what I was trying to tell those ungentlemanly-like individuals.Personally, I'd like to stick to the topic at hand. There are other forums for discussing other topics.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.