• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Full Circle

^ Watch Star Trek 2 and think to yourself at the emotional climax "meh Spock's not really going to die" it cheapens the scene. You've read Full Circle, now read the characters' emotional journeys and think "Janeway's coming back" it cheapens it.

You know, I've heard other people state this, and it doesn't make sense to me. The other characters in the book believe that she is gone, so their grief is real. Whether I know she is coming back or not does't change that. And, believe me, when I watch Spock die, knowing he's going to be restored does nothing to lessen the emotional impact of that scene for me.

Nimoy has had a love/hate relationship with Spock from the beginning, so I'm not sure his attitude about Spock's death is relevant in this discussion. The titles of his two memoirs prove that: "I am Not Spock" in 1979 followed by "I Am Spock" in 1996. :vulcan:
 
^ Watch Star Trek 2 and think to yourself at the emotional climax "meh Spock's not really going to die" it cheapens the scene.

So TWOK had been "cheapened" for the last 28 years for every viewer?

Supposedly. And, btw, he does die. He just comes back thanks to the Genesis device.

And thank goodness he did because Spock is a FANTASTIC character.. that we even see him again at the (human age) of 80 in ST:XI makes me all the more grateful he returned.

It's not like you can replace him. And it's not like you can replace Janeway with a captain or admiral that serve a purpose for a couple books.
 
My God, I'm under attack!!!

Been there, done that.

Trust me, I have.

The only reassurance anyone has is that she's with Q.

And I have watched TWoK knowing that he comes back and I still cry when he dies. I have since I was four and didn't even understand what was going on, it was a beautiful scene.

Bringing her back wouldn't cheapen her death. It would actually sweeten it.
Just like Kirk, and Spock, and Trip's. I'd even say Data being resurrected in B4 as well.

Yes we should bring back Janeway exactly like Data should be brought back:

KJ has a sister who has severe learning difficulties and they discover it's possible for them to download KJs consciousness into her poor sister's body. It'll destroy the sister's consciousness, but who cares, we want KJ back.

Professor X, what are your thoughts?

^ Watch Star Trek 2 and think to yourself at the emotional climax "meh Spock's not really going to die" it cheapens the scene. You've read Full Circle, now read the characters' emotional journeys and think "Janeway's coming back" it cheapens it.

You know, I've heard other people state this, and it doesn't make sense to me. The other characters in the book believe that she is gone, so their grief is real. Whether I know she is coming back or not does't change that. And, believe me, when I watch Spock die, knowing he's going to be restored does nothing to lessen the emotional impact of that scene for me.

Nimoy has had a love/hate relationship with Spock from the beginning, so I'm not sure his attitude about Spock's death is relevant in this discussion. The titles of his two memoirs prove that: "I am Not Spock" in 1979 followed by "I Am Spock" in 1996. :vulcan:

His attitude about Spock is totally relevant, we're discussing the real world here as well as the Trek Verse and in the real world, that was the reason!

^ Watch Star Trek 2 and think to yourself at the emotional climax "meh Spock's not really going to die" it cheapens the scene.

So TWOK had been "cheapened" for the last 28 years for every viewer?

Arguably, yes. TSFS was a bit of a let down after TWOK.

And looks what happens when you get bored and decide to view past posts, and guess who started this thread:

http://trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=95373

JB2005 you are just very adamant on this subject aren't you :)

*cough* militant janeway fans *cough*

I'd forgotten about that thread. As I recall it was one of 3 that was going at the time, all which explored the issue from various angles. In that one I was interested in the idea of "Karmic Balances" in Trek, which is raised in TWOK/TSFS. IF Janeway comes back, who dies for her?

So TWOK had been "cheapened" for the last 28 years for every viewer?

Supposedly. And, btw, he does die. He just comes back thanks to the Genesis device.

And thank goodness he did because Spock is a FANTASTIC character.. that we even see him again at the (human age) of 80 in ST:XI makes me all the more grateful he returned.

It's not like you can replace him. And it's not like you can replace Janeway with a captain or admiral that serve a purpose for a couple books.

Of course you can replace spock. That's what Xon and Saavik were for!

I just want to make it clear, I like Janeway as a character! I was very mad when she was killed off, I thought it had been done badly and I was sure it would be undone with the next Voyager book. But when it wasn't I thought "bloody hell that was brave" and I read Full Circle and I realised something:

DS9 is an ensemble show. Always has been always will be. So the beauty of it was that when Sisko was removed, the show lost the "Captain" but it didn't lose the only main character. The other characters were fully rounded and capable of continuing the story.

Voyager is about Janeway and Seven and the Doctor and the interactions between the 3 with the rest of the cast supporting those interactions, occassionally allowing for some character growth, but generally in a way that relates back to the core trio (similar to the TOS formula).

Now, that means that when Janeway was removed, we lost our anchor as far as the premise of Voyager is concerned, and so the series becomes an ensemble piece. Seven and the Doctor can't be the main characters on their own, because they were dependent on Janeway to anchor them, so what do we see?

Chakotay becomes the show's captain, but he's damaged. Part of the problem with Chakotay is that he has 2 overarching character traits: 1) he is Janeway's first officer 2) he is a native american. And that's it. All of his character development over 7 years has pretty much come back to that. Which means in Spirit Walk, Golden was forced to rely on his one remaining character trait: ie he is a Native American. Beyer therefore has to show us what happens to Chakotay when he stops being Janeway's first officer: both figuritively and literally. What do I mean by that? Figuratively because even as Captain I personally don't think he ever saw himself as Captain, merely waiting for Janeway to resume command. So when Janeway dies, he suddenly loses that which he has clung to, and it breaks him and forces him to re-evaluate himself.

His leaving Starfleet in Full Circle and re-joining in Unworthy is significant. Chakotay had to leave because as long as his service was unbroken, he would forever be Janeway's first officer. By leaving and returning he is able to come back as "The Captain" and assume to role rightfully, rather than forever being in the shadow of Janeway.

Also by leaving Starfleet, he is able to assume the role of Seven's mentor from Janeway. He is the one who looks after her after the Caeliar incident, sacrificing his career to do so. In terms of the series, in Full Circle and Unworthy we see Chakotay's character finally emerge. He stops being just "The Native American" and "Janeway's First Officer" and becomes "The Captain". But this character development would never have come about if Janeway had lived.

Tuvok now on Titan, so seperated himself from Janeway by moving series.

Paris like Chakotay, prepared to leave Starfleet, only in his case for B'Elanna. Paris I will give credit to the VOY writers for. He did have something of a story arc. He started the series as a dishonourable rogue, moved up to honourable rogue, moved up to being honourable and finally accepted himself as a family man. Similarly he learns who he is through the death of Admiral Paris. He has always lived in the shadow of the greats, his father was always a yard stick he would be held up to, and as long as Chakotay was only filling the command chair for Janeway, Paris was only filling the first officer's chair for Chakotay. With the death of Janeway and Paris serving under Eden, then the "new" Chakotay, he becomes first officer in his own right, rather than merely inheriting the role by virtue of being third officer.

Kim was always living in Janeway's shadow. Right up to Endgame. With Janeway's death he (like Seven) loses his mentor, but we are able to see in him a maturity that he did not previously have, he's finally standing on his own and more importantly standing up to Tom, who he's always been somewhat secondary to up until now.

I'd imagine that if Voyager had been more ensemble, like DS9, then Janeway's death would have been far less controversial.
 
Last edited:
...I also second what you said about people trying to make Marco Palmieri, Margaret Clark, and Jaime Costas' firings part of their 'bring back Janeway' crusade...

In the interest of clarity, please note that while Marco and Margaret were laid off, Jaime left of her own accord. It's also worth mentioning that "firing" is usually something that happens for cause...the individual in question is not performing their job adequately...and being "laid off" usually describes what happens when a company decides to eliminate a position or positions and whoever is in the position in question is let go.

...In tough times, it is scary to branch away from the "tried and true" plots and characterizations that seem to keep the current readership happy, but innovation and change is essential to growth and to the addition of new readers. It is a shame that the editors and writers didn't use Voyager to branch out and try something new. ...

And while I know you won't agree with this, I would argue that this is exactly what has been done with Voyager. There is nothing tried and true about the new direction of Voyager. We did try something new. It just so happens that the particular direction we chose was not the one you would have liked to see pursued.

...The simple answer is to write Voyager the way the readers want it.

Yes, but which readers? For as many who are displeased with the new direction, there are many who are thrilled and have decided to give Voyager a try without ever having enjoyed the series previously.

Bottom line, there is no simple answer to any of this. There is no objective right or wrong here. There is your subjective preference, and that of others who share your views, along with others who disagree completely for their own perfectly valid and purely subjective reasons. Believe me, if there were one "right" way to do this, my job would be a lot easier. It would also probably be so mind numbingly boring that it would hardly be worth the effort.

If PB is in the business of selling books, they would do well to diversify rather than restrict the imagination and direction their novelists can take. The environment the writers face (having read Beyer's most recent pots), which means having to coordinate with what everyone else is writing and what other novels will be developing, sounds like one of the rings of hell to me. Ugh. No wonder all the books are alike.

Again, to clarify, what I described above was the process for a very specific set of books that in some ways were interconnected. I don't know if this had ever been done before but I do know that with very few exceptions since then, this has not been the case.

Destiny and its aftermath aside, every writer of tie-in fiction approaches their work differently. I'm one who read and re-read every single novel written about Voyager before I started my work, along with every novel post Endgame featuring Voyager characters. Timelines, charts of character developments, new details added about characters were all created so that it would be possible for me to remain as true as I could to everything that had been developed previously, whether it was canon or not.

For Full Circle (and Unworthy to a much smaller degree) my stories and everyone else's were created comletely independently and then sections that might overlap or relate to others were run past the appropriate author. These books weren't written by committee, and the process was actually incredibly helpful.

Now that Voyager is again pretty much on its own, this kind of collaboration is not necessary. Honestly, I kind of miss it. It was the nature of that project, however, and not the status quo going forward.

I'm sure some of the other authors do the same kind of research I do when preparing their projects, but some don't. It's a personal thing for me, and not one even I can always live up to. When I wrote my Buffy novel, for examply, I started to read many of the previous books but when I realized how many of them there were it became clear that I could do the same kind of exaustive research I did for Trek, or I could complete my manuscript on time. I chose to meet my deadline and in that case, I don't think the book suffered.

Kirsten Beyer
 
Arguably, yes. TSFS was a bit of a let down after TWOK.

The movie was pretty poor. TWOK was pretty awesome. I daresay that had a lot to do with any "let down".

So you would rather Spock had stayed dead?


And in turn that rather awesome part from Voyage Home where he's in the whale's tank with them never happened.

I've written a whole spiel about character interpretation in my above post that informs this:

TVH was different from the other films because it was the ensemble film. It was still primarily about K/S/McC but every character was given their own role to play in order to contribute individually to the story. Why am I saying this?

TVH could have worked equally as well with Saavik in the role of Spock, but changed from being "back from the dead" to being "the new kid on the block".

But there's two differences between killing Spock and Janeway:

1) Spock wasn't dead very long. He was partly mourned, but no one came to terms with his death because they were almost straight away going to get him back. So unlike Janeway where 2 years have now passed, and there has been significant character development, here it was more like Picard's "death" in Gambit.

2) Spock was not the main character, nor did the series revolve around him. He was integral, but arguably not crucial. TOS would change without him, but YMMV on how radically. Now imagine if they'd made a TOS movie without Kirk? That would be comparable.
 
"Anomalous reaction" for Trek? Were you around when Spock died? The reaction was awesome and he was immediately restored in the next movie. Did you hear the outcry when Trip was killed? He came back so fast in the novel that he might as well never have died. When Sisko went to visit the prophets, the wailing was audible. He's back in the novels. So my question is this: How is the reaction of the Voyager fans over Janeway's death an anomalous reaction? Is it really any different than the others, or is it just that YOU don't care about her? :)

Did you even read my post? I said absolutely nothing about Janeway's death or the reaction to it, which is a completely separate issue. What I was addressing/talking about is this idea that Voyager is only Voyager if Kathryn Janeway remains in a centralized role.

I also can't honestly believe that you're accusing me of not caring about Janeway's character because I don't understand this 'Voyager is only Voyager if it revolves around/intimately involves Janeway' sentiment. For your information, she happens to be one of my favorite characters from the series, but I'm not so blindly devoted to her that I see her as the 'be all/end all' of the series.

To whomever said that Voyager was about/ revolved around Janeway, Seven, and the Doctor: The original series bible for Voyager specifies that the show was meant to be an ensemble piece. This idea was moved away from as things progressed, but never to the degree that you seem to believe that it did.
 
Last edited:
So TWOK had been "cheapened" for the last 28 years for every viewer?

For this viewer? Yes. On two counts:

1. It set up a precedent for major characters not staying dead.

2. It robbed Trek of a chance to set a new course, with new dynamics.
 
Hannibal, to bring this a bit more on topic again:

planck.jpg


For now the QSD refit of Voyager will keep me busy, guess that is a good thing. Waiting for May for the rest! :)

I started with the Escape pods, here is a work in progress shot. That is all I can share for now!
 
Sorry if I stepped on toes. It's just that, when talking about a fictional universe, I don't really mind if writers "defy" the reality of death. When we are already transporting people and traveling faster than the speed of light, mortality would be an easy fix!

The fact is, Janeway isn't really dead. Bringing her back is not on the same level of ridiculousness of Spock or Trip or even Data. Janeway, like Sisko, has been "whooshed" away by aliens and can be just as easily "whooshed" back. As one poster said above, it could be an awesome event, uplifting and exciting. I'm sure Kirsten Beyer could nail it! I want to read it! And, then, I want to read everything else! :drool:
 
Sorry if I stepped on toes. It's just that, when talking about a fictional universe, I don't really mind if writers "defy" the reality of death. When we are already transporting people and traveling faster than the speed of light, mortality would be an easy fix!

The fact is, Janeway isn't really dead. Bringing her back is not on the same level of ridiculousness of Spock or Trip or even Data. Janeway, like Sisko, has been "whooshed" away by aliens and can be just as easily "whooshed" back. As one poster said above, it could be an awesome event, uplifting and exciting. I'm sure Kirsten Beyer could nail it! I want to read it! And, then, I want to read everything else! :drool:

I think I'd be less inclined to read Voyager books (but never say never) if they brought Janeway back. Simply because they would be returning to the dynamics of a TV show I really didn't care all that much about.
 
Sorry if I stepped on toes. It's just that, when talking about a fictional universe, I don't really mind if writers "defy" the reality of death. When we are already transporting people and traveling faster than the speed of light, mortality would be an easy fix!

The fact is, Janeway isn't really dead. Bringing her back is not on the same level of ridiculousness of Spock or Trip or even Data. Janeway, like Sisko, has been "whooshed" away by aliens and can be just as easily "whooshed" back. As one poster said above, it could be an awesome event, uplifting and exciting. I'm sure Kirsten Beyer could nail it! I want to read it! And, then, I want to read everything else! :drool:

I think I'd be less inclined to read Voyager books (but never say never) if they brought Janeway back. Simply because they would be returning to the dynamics of a TV show I really didn't care all that much about.

And that's fine. I don't read DS9 novels for the same reason. But there are a lot of people out there who are clamoring for more Voyager as we knew it. You can buy what you like, because it's there, but what I like isn't there. I want it. Waaah. ;)
 
And that's fine. I don't read DS9 novels for the same reason. But there are a lot of people out there who are clamoring for more Voyager as we knew it. You can buy what you like, because it's there, but what I like isn't there. I want it. Waaah. ;)

Funny thing is... I agree to a point. I'm constantly clamoring for more Trek novels set during the various TV series runs. I just want a healthy mix of old and new. I'd love to see a new novel featuring Data, but I realize that novel needs to take place prior to Nemesis.
 
Aunt Kate and others have made repeated references to Janeway acting/being written out-of-character by Peter David in Before Dishonor, but I have to say that, having just started to read the book for myself, I'm not currently seeing any evidence of that being the case. Granted, I'm only a handful of pages into the story, so that might change, but for now, she still seems like the same old Janeway to me..
 
Aunt Kate and others have made repeated references to Janeway acting/being written out-of-character by Peter David in Before Dishonor, but I have to say that, having just started to read the book for myself, I'm not currently seeing any evidence of that being the case. Granted, I'm only a handful of pages into the story, so that might change, but for now, she still seems like the same old Janeway to me..

Tough for her to be portrayed as 'out-of-character' when comparing her against the character on TV. :lol:
 
Since Janeway is assimilated fairly early on in the story, I was wondering if Aunt Kate or someone else could explain/clarify what they feel is so out-of-character about the way that Peter David portrays her prior to her falling victim to that fate (being assimilated) since, as noted, I didn't see any evidence of her acting/behaving any differently.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top