Around here I'm generally known as a TOS only fan to the point I think it's widely believed that for me Star Trek begins and ends with the original series.
There is some truth to that in that TOS is the only series I like as a whole, warts and all. That said there is Star Trek that I have liked beyond the original series---for my tastes there just wasn't enough of it.
And so recently I've just picked the first two season sets of TNG and intend to revisit this show that I haven't really watched in a very long time, easily at least seventeen years.
Back in 1986 when I first heard rumors and read the first snippets (in Starlog magazine as well as the entertainment section of the daily paper) regarding what would become The Next Generation I was intensely curious as well as anxious. How could Star Trek be done without the established original crew? Are they gonna ruin it or, heaven forbid, could it actually be better?
When I first saw the pilot "Encounter At Farpoint" I certainly wasn't impressed. I thought it very awkwardly executed, the acting all over the map and I hated the new look Enterprise. I was assured they'd blown it... Yet periodically I'd catch an occasional episode and once in awhile I'd note some measure of improvement. Essentially despite so many things that didn't seem to work I was seeing something of appeal in the new show.
At the time I was highly critical of this new interpretation of Star Trek, but some years later in retrospect, although I still think it was inexcusably mishandled and unpolished in the early stages, I reasoned that the gamble was a smart and laudable one. It really was the only way to inject new vigor into the franchise without recasting the original crew with new actors, something that at the time I highly doubt anyone would have accepted with any measure of ease.
Now I've been, and remain, highly critical of much of what has followed in Trek's name since, but in retrospect I feel less animosity than I once did for those early years of this then new Star Trek. And so within the next day or so I'll begin revisiting those episodes (mercifully without tiresome commercial breaks) and sharing my impressions.
I'd like to note that in 1987 while I was somewhat trying to ignore the new series I also happened to read some of the new novels based on the show. Oddly at the time I found myself thinking that the show would be better if it were more like the novels. Of course part of that was due to me reading the characters' lines and seeing it unfold in my imagination as opposed to watching the actors struggle with their delivery.
There is some truth to that in that TOS is the only series I like as a whole, warts and all. That said there is Star Trek that I have liked beyond the original series---for my tastes there just wasn't enough of it.
And so recently I've just picked the first two season sets of TNG and intend to revisit this show that I haven't really watched in a very long time, easily at least seventeen years.
Back in 1986 when I first heard rumors and read the first snippets (in Starlog magazine as well as the entertainment section of the daily paper) regarding what would become The Next Generation I was intensely curious as well as anxious. How could Star Trek be done without the established original crew? Are they gonna ruin it or, heaven forbid, could it actually be better?
When I first saw the pilot "Encounter At Farpoint" I certainly wasn't impressed. I thought it very awkwardly executed, the acting all over the map and I hated the new look Enterprise. I was assured they'd blown it... Yet periodically I'd catch an occasional episode and once in awhile I'd note some measure of improvement. Essentially despite so many things that didn't seem to work I was seeing something of appeal in the new show.
At the time I was highly critical of this new interpretation of Star Trek, but some years later in retrospect, although I still think it was inexcusably mishandled and unpolished in the early stages, I reasoned that the gamble was a smart and laudable one. It really was the only way to inject new vigor into the franchise without recasting the original crew with new actors, something that at the time I highly doubt anyone would have accepted with any measure of ease.
Now I've been, and remain, highly critical of much of what has followed in Trek's name since, but in retrospect I feel less animosity than I once did for those early years of this then new Star Trek. And so within the next day or so I'll begin revisiting those episodes (mercifully without tiresome commercial breaks) and sharing my impressions.
I'd like to note that in 1987 while I was somewhat trying to ignore the new series I also happened to read some of the new novels based on the show. Oddly at the time I found myself thinking that the show would be better if it were more like the novels. Of course part of that was due to me reading the characters' lines and seeing it unfold in my imagination as opposed to watching the actors struggle with their delivery.
Last edited: