They're Baaaaaack [SPOILERS]

[WillsBabe]

In that shot he almost looks like a young David Tennant.

For a moment, I thought it was Tennant. My husband was looking at the new pics of him and his new assistant the other day and commented that they're just like a young Donna and 10.

 

[Samurai8472]

Maybe..........


Amy is actually Donna who went back to her half timelord status, then got caught in the regeneration and became young!

To remember being Donna would kill her so the Doctor quickly calls her Amy

 

[Starkers]

I would not say I'm sick of the Daleks, just sick of how they've been used recentally. Specifically of how we always have the Doctor facing a massive army of Daleks, only to defeat them and we're supposed to believe that with this defeat the Daleks are wiped out for good.

The Daleks will always be back. We know this. Showing them supposedly being "wiped out" repeatedly does get tiresome, as does I would imagine trying to come up with an excuse for why they Daleks have survived their exinction. Avoid this issue, don't eterminate the Daleks for good. Defeat them, yes, but leave their potential return open, since a return is inevitable anyway.

Well the Cybermen escaping the Void to turn up in Victorian London in The Next Doctor kinda presumes that Daleks might have escaped the same way, so it's not like their reappearance will be that unexpected, but I completely agree, have the Doctor defeat the specific Dalek plan by all means, but not the entire Dalek race, that has grown very silly during RTD's tenure.

 

[StCoop]

One of the cast trailers had Churchill's name on it. And they always use character names or code names rather than actors names. (Another had "Voice Of The Enemy" aka Nick Briggs.)

Now look at this. If only the 'tache wasn't there...

 

[Lonemagpie]

I would not say I'm sick of the Daleks, just sick of how they've been used recentally. Specifically of how we always have the Doctor facing a massive army of Daleks, only to defeat them and we're supposed to believe that with this defeat the Daleks are wiped out for good.
The Daleks will always be back. We know this. Showing them supposedly being "wiped out" repeatedly does get tiresome, as does I would imagine trying to come up with an excuse for why they Daleks have survived their exinction. Avoid this issue, don't eterminate the Daleks for good. Defeat them, yes, but leave their potential return open, since a return is inevitable anyway.

QF absolute T

Well the Cybermen escaping the Void to turn up in Victorian London in The Next Doctor kinda presumes that Daleks might have escaped the same way,

They don't even need that- Sec's undamaged casing and engineering, and the remains of Jast and Thay, were left behind in 1930s New York. A spot of wartime reverse-engineering later, and voila...

 

[Starkers]

I would not say I'm sick of the Daleks, just sick of how they've been used recentally. Specifically of how we always have the Doctor facing a massive army of Daleks, only to defeat them and we're supposed to believe that with this defeat the Daleks are wiped out for good.
The Daleks will always be back. We know this. Showing them supposedly being "wiped out" repeatedly does get tiresome, as does I would imagine trying to come up with an excuse for why they Daleks have survived their exinction. Avoid this issue, don't eterminate the Daleks for good. Defeat them, yes, but leave their potential return open, since a return is inevitable anyway.

QF absolute T

Well the Cybermen escaping the Void to turn up in Victorian London in The Next Doctor kinda presumes that Daleks might have escaped the same way,

They don't even need that- Sec's undamaged casing and engineering, and the remains of Jast and Thay, were left behind in 1930s New York. A spot of wartime reverse-engineering later, and voila...

What? The Doctor didn't tidy up before he left?

 

[Starkers]

One of the cast trailers had Churchill's name on it. And they always use character names or code names rather than actors names. (Another had "Voice Of The Enemy" aka Nick Briggs.)

Now look at this. If only the 'tache wasn't there...

Looks a bit old for Churchill if you ask me. About the only real similarities are the hairine and the jumpsuit.

 

[Chaos Descending]

The pictures SEEM to be depicting soldiers' uniforms from WWI not WWII, which seems to me to squash the "Salvaged Cult of Skaro Parts" theory.

 

[StCoop]

Real or fake? Make up your own minds.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/alun_vega/3865648374/

 

[captcalhoun]

bullshit sounds nothing like Matt.

 

[StCoop]

bullshit sounds nothing like Matt.

And yet it comes from one of the two people who supply 90% of all the set reports and photos we've ever seen.

 

[Allyn Gibson]

I wonder if the reason for the weird enunciation of the word "Daleks" is that it's a scene where the Doctor gets shot, say by the Daleks, so to edit the scene he has to trail the dialogue like that.

 

[StCoop]

I wonder if the reason for the weird enunciation of the word "Daleks" is that it's a scene where the Doctor gets shot, say by the Daleks, so to edit the scene he has to trail the dialogue like that.

Or he spent the past six months watching Original Series DVDs and decided Sylvester McCoy was the way to go.

 

[Piper]

bullshit sounds nothing like Matt.

I think if it was fake the forger would have tried to do a slightly more convincing job.

 

[Cky]

God, I hope that's fake. His enunciation of the word "Daleks" pissed me off straight away.

Oh, in addition to what I said a page or so ago (I think), I had a good time in Cardiff, and I think I saw Karen walking around in Cardiff Bay, but I didn't approach her or even follow up to see if it was her .

If it wasn't, kudos to that girl, I'm moving to wales.

 

[StCoop]

One good thing, it demolishes all those weird ideas about supposed reboots or memory wipes for the Doctor to give Moffat a clean slate.

 

[Cky]

It's weird though, because The Doctor states that he sent the Daleks back to the void, but in Journeys End, they're destroyed. So I'm guessing The Doctor is talking about the events in Doomsday and not what happened in Journeys End.

 

[StCoop]

It's weird though, because The Doctor states that he sent the Daleks back to the void, but in Journeys End, they're destroyed. So I'm guessing The Doctor is talking about the events in Doomsday and not what happened in Journeys End.

He's talking about both. Back to the Void is 'Doomsday' and Saved Reality would be 'Journey's End'.

(Come to think of it, it wasn't him in the latter case, was it. It was 10.5 and Donna.)

 

[Cky]

Yeah, 10.5 and Donna saved reality, not The Doctor. I just find it weird for him to reference Doomsday, why not reference each time he's destroyed, or stopped the Daleks if they want to reference anything... it's happened in every series :/.

 

[Chaos Descending]

Because maybe these Daleks SPECIFICALLY came back from the void.