I think he really enjoyed TUC as well. Most critics did in 1991.
Star Trek Rotten Tomatoes Rating
- Thread starter Argus Skyhawk
- Start date
I think he really enjoyed TUC as well. Most critics did in 1991.
Ebert is a dried up hack.
I keep forgetting, between Ebert and the late Gene Siskel, wasn't it Siskel who liked all things Star Trek more to begin with?
Ebert's review is fair and balanced. And it's not a pan. Origins movies are hard, especially when you have to introduce seven characters (and a starship
). He'd just like to see all that energy go into something a little more heavyweight. To paraphrase what he said at the end, now that we've established the characters, let's see their characters tested.
Oh teh noes! We're doomed!
WTF Ebert!! He gave 17 again a more favorable review than Star Trek.
By my estimation, that should lower our RT rating to 95% fresh by the time his review is up. A big blow for the top critic section with at least an 83%. Nevertheless, a 95% rating is still very impressive. Lets just pray it doesnt get any lower.
By my estimation, that should lower our RT rating to 95% fresh by the time his review is up. A big blow for the top critic section with at least an 83%. Nevertheless, a 95% rating is still very impressive. Lets just pray it doesnt get any lower.
An 80 would be impressive. Another rotten in the tomato.
Oh fuck! Another negative review from Movie City Reviews.
Relax! I was expecting somewhere between 70-75, so this is all good.
Relax...
Are we seriously going to start freaking out because Trek might drop to 90 % Or 80 % for that matter
Are we seriously going to start freaking out because Trek might drop to 90 % Or 80 % for that matter
Roger Ebert liked the movie for the most part. At least his review has substance.
59-3 including Egbert...
What is annoying me is the lack of moderating at RT with so called community scores being 0 & 10% from people who refust to sccept change in TREK or hate all things TREK and wanna jerk themselves off by labelling it nerdy.
As for these 3 negative reviews I read them and I wonder where is the actual review they talk less about the movie and more for the hatred of SCI FI or how they don't understand it because there dumb asses. Hell Egbert says its a fun movie and then goes on how the movie is poor on the SCIENCE...
HELLO thats why it called Science - FICTION
J.J and his crew have worked hard on this movie and some people are just down right insulting with there take on it. If you think its a bad movie then fine prove it properly.
What is annoying me is the lack of moderating at RT with so called community scores being 0 & 10% from people who refust to sccept change in TREK or hate all things TREK and wanna jerk themselves off by labelling it nerdy.
As for these 3 negative reviews I read them and I wonder where is the actual review they talk less about the movie and more for the hatred of SCI FI or how they don't understand it because there dumb asses. Hell Egbert says its a fun movie and then goes on how the movie is poor on the SCIENCE...
HELLO thats why it called Science - FICTION
J.J and his crew have worked hard on this movie and some people are just down right insulting with there take on it. If you think its a bad movie then fine prove it properly.
Another positive. Making it 60-4. After Ebert posted the 4th negative. (RT takes awhile to update its count).
Then why the F ‘ing 2.5 star rating ?!
About 95% of the time, I agree with the rest of his reviews. I thought we were pals, Ebert!
Dude, calm.
An A- from Entertainment Weekly.
I'm not sure Ebert's review could be considered completely negative, didn't sound bad at all. But in terms of the details, he didn't like the recent Trek's, but the new one changes almost everything, and he doesn't like that one either. Oh well, maybe he's senile.
In terms of more of the major critics, Rolling Stone has this positive review:
http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/20314046/review/27993027/star_trek
By Owen Gleiberman
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20276708,00.html
he result is more exciting than the last four ST pictures put together, more fun than a barrel of Tribbles, and the most satisfying action-adventure since last year's Iron Man.
http://www.philly.com/philly/entert...6_Star_Trek_prequel_a_warp-speed_success.html
61-4 Positive
RAMA
Even the "rotten" reviews don't really trash the movie. I am disappointed in Ebert, though.
On the upside, it's up to 8.1/10
On the upside, it's up to 8.1/10
Rii
Rear Admiral
We must've been reading different reviews.
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Poll
