Yeah, it's like how people don't get why she slept with Doctor Clemens. He was the first REAL kindred spirit she'd met since the whole mess began (aside from Dallas), she was in need of physical comfort, and it HAD been close to 60 years. Why NOT go for a romp?
What I've found interesting about the development of the third film is that there was never a point where Fox considered a Ripley/Hicks/Newt movie. The William Gibson draft dispensed of Ripley entirely and had Hicks battling the Aliens. Later drafts dispensed of Hicks and Newt off-stage early and left Ripley alone, like in the Ward/Fasano script. For whatever reason, leaving Cameron's "family" intact for a third film was never considered viable.
This third Alien movie is as mythical a beast as the third Halloween or as some as madmen have claimed three new Star Wars movies and something called Star Trek V. These things simply do not exist those who claim otherwise are insane.![]()
I don't see how it could be "correcting" anything considering Cameron directed both films. It was his creation and presumably, he took it in the direction that he wanted/intended.Well, to be honest T3 was just reaffirming the message of T1, so it was more "correcting" things than anything else. Of course T1 was the best in the entire series as well, and I don't think there should've been ANY sequels but that's just me.
As for sex with an Alien, yeah I don't know what Weaver was on when she thought that up and why that thought stayed in her mind...
Of course, we don't know if she had some kind of casual hook ups in between leaving gateway station's medical facility and departing for LV-426 on the Sulaco.
Wow - pondering the casual sex life of a fictional character in a science fiction series. I think that is a new kind of depth I have plumbed there!
Well, it owes a lot to Harlan Ellison really but I do think Cameron is the type who'd easily forgo the more logical ending for a more contrived "happy" one. He had the original ending but then he decided years later he wanted a happier but more nonsensical one so he made T2.
Yes, and similarly, Aliens, while having a somewhat although not completely different "tone" from the original Alien (which is perfectly valid for a sequel), ended up being one of the most exciting and memorable action oriented science fiction movies ever made. On the other hand, Alien 3 is easily and best forgotten about.Well, it owes a lot to Harlan Ellison really but I do think Cameron is the type who'd easily forgo the more logical ending for a more contrived "happy" one. He had the original ending but then he decided years later he wanted a happier but more nonsensical one so he made T2.
Actually I think he probably wanted to direct a huge blockbuster and make a shit-ton of money. It is true that T1 is just about the perfect closed-loop paradox movie and T2 kind of blows that away, but T2 is a great film in it's own right - something T3, despite restoring the depressing ending, fails to do.
I don't see why, in a series of movies, they all have to have similar endings - wouldn't that get a bit boring? Making a second film have a happier ending than the first one isn't a betrayal of any kind - it's just telling a different story within the same universe.
Also, Harlan Ellison really needs to shut the hell up - he seems to think that he invented time travel. Stories are often similar, and they are often inspired by other stories, Demon With a Glass Hand is a great story with similarities to Terminator, but for him to claim royalties is insane. And apparently he can't get justice because he came up with the absolutely BRILLIANT idea of a fucking magic talking archway that provides time-travel in a completely arbitrary way, forty-five bloody years ago. How long did he take to shit that idea out? (Note - I absolutely love City On The Edge of Forever - but the reasons for that have nothing to do with the silly magic time doorway and everything to do with things that weren't in Ellison's original, unfilmable, script)
Yes, and similarly, Aliens, while having a somewhat although not completely different "tone" from the original Alien (which is perfectly valid for a sequel), ended up being one of the most exciting and memorable action oriented science fiction movies ever made. On the other hand, Alien 3 is easily and best forgotten about.
Perhaps we should look at it this way: In Aliens, she wins against the aliens. In Alien 3, she defeats the alien again. What she failed to do is win against Weyland-Yutani.
Yes, and similarly, Aliens, while having a somewhat although not completely different "tone" from the original Alien (which is perfectly valid for a sequel), ended up being one of the most exciting and memorable action oriented science fiction movies ever made. On the other hand, Alien 3 is easily and best forgotten about.Well, it owes a lot to Harlan Ellison really but I do think Cameron is the type who'd easily forgo the more logical ending for a more contrived "happy" one. He had the original ending but then he decided years later he wanted a happier but more nonsensical one so he made T2.
Actually I think he probably wanted to direct a huge blockbuster and make a shit-ton of money. It is true that T1 is just about the perfect closed-loop paradox movie and T2 kind of blows that away, but T2 is a great film in it's own right - something T3, despite restoring the depressing ending, fails to do.
I don't see why, in a series of movies, they all have to have similar endings - wouldn't that get a bit boring? Making a second film have a happier ending than the first one isn't a betrayal of any kind - it's just telling a different story within the same universe.
Also, Harlan Ellison really needs to shut the hell up - he seems to think that he invented time travel. Stories are often similar, and they are often inspired by other stories, Demon With a Glass Hand is a great story with similarities to Terminator, but for him to claim royalties is insane. And apparently he can't get justice because he came up with the absolutely BRILLIANT idea of a fucking magic talking archway that provides time-travel in a completely arbitrary way, forty-five bloody years ago. How long did he take to shit that idea out? (Note - I absolutely love City On The Edge of Forever - but the reasons for that have nothing to do with the silly magic time doorway and everything to do with things that weren't in Ellison's original, unfilmable, script)
You can find flaws with anything if you study it close enough. It's hard for me to think of a more exciting end to a movie than the fight between the Alien Queen and Ripley in the load lifter. That movie will go down in history as a classic. Alien 3, not so much.Yes, and similarly, Aliens, while having a somewhat although not completely different "tone" from the original Alien (which is perfectly valid for a sequel), ended up being one of the most exciting and memorable action oriented science fiction movies ever made. On the other hand, Alien 3 is easily and best forgotten about.Actually I think he probably wanted to direct a huge blockbuster and make a shit-ton of money. It is true that T1 is just about the perfect closed-loop paradox movie and T2 kind of blows that away, but T2 is a great film in it's own right - something T3, despite restoring the depressing ending, fails to do.
I don't see why, in a series of movies, they all have to have similar endings - wouldn't that get a bit boring? Making a second film have a happier ending than the first one isn't a betrayal of any kind - it's just telling a different story within the same universe.
Also, Harlan Ellison really needs to shut the hell up - he seems to think that he invented time travel. Stories are often similar, and they are often inspired by other stories, Demon With a Glass Hand is a great story with similarities to Terminator, but for him to claim royalties is insane. And apparently he can't get justice because he came up with the absolutely BRILLIANT idea of a fucking magic talking archway that provides time-travel in a completely arbitrary way, forty-five bloody years ago. How long did he take to shit that idea out? (Note - I absolutely love City On The Edge of Forever - but the reasons for that have nothing to do with the silly magic time doorway and everything to do with things that weren't in Ellison's original, unfilmable, script)
Aliens is just the movie "Them!" only set on another planet. And the action/effects aren't even that good when you study it close enough (especially that silly elephant noise they gave the Aliens) while the characters are all either stereotypes or hams. A3 is the ultimate ballsy movie Hollywood made, it totally gives the finger to regular Hollywood conventions and denies the happy ending. It still makes me laugh whenever anyone talks about "we should forget Alien 3".
Except you're using the ends to justify the means. It wasn't a "dark series" until Alien 3 tried to steer it back in that direction. Also, I think you are trying to criticize Aliens for some of the action film clichés that it helped to create in the first place.I don't believe in dark series having a "Off into the Sunset" ending, so I'm satisfied with Ripley destroying the Alien but in the process destroying herself as well. I think that's way more fitting than "Mommy!".
As for exciting ends, it just stinks of video game. Player vs the predictable final boss.
Going down in history? As an action piece yes, but better analysis of the plot will prevent it from being anything more than a good action film.
Plenty of people beyond me will (and do) enjoy this film, you can ignore it and see the typical Hollywood end as the end if you will but it won't change that Aliens was NOT the end.
It's hard for me to think of a more exciting end to a movie than the fight between the Alien Queen and Ripley in the load lifter. That movie will go down in history as a classic. Alien 3, not so much.
Sure, Alien 3 took a lot of chances with the franchise, but that doesn't in and of itself make it entertaining or good.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.