Impressive, how many of those true-life tools were made in Chicago; 45-50 years ago, there was still a lot of manufacturing here.
Iowa....hmmmmmmmmmm.alchemist, those are made by Lisle Corporation, still manufacturing in Iowa: "Lisle Corporation will celebrate the company’s founding and 100 years of continuous manufacturing in Clarinda, Iowa in 2003. The privately owned company is led today by third, fourth and fifth generation family members..."
Great information (as always), Greg. I'm especially impressed with the accurate recreations of McCoy's medical devices. Were these specially turned for you or did you find some pre-made source?
There was a device that Spock supposedly designed... can't remember the name of it. I think it might be called the Trident Scanner. You saw it in a few episodes, like in Metamorphosis (Spock was using it on the aft section of the shuttlecraft) or during a few scenes in the main engine room in several episodes, like The Ultimate Computer and The Doomsday Machine.
Anyway, this device was reused in a manner of speaking. The 3 "prongs" of the device were cannibalized and used for some sonic disruptor weapons in A Taste of Armageddon.
![]()
![]()
![]()
It even made a reappearance in DS9: Trials and Tribble-ations
![]()
The term "ray-generator" first appears in the script for the episode "Metamorphosis" (which is where this prop makes its first appearance). "Metamorphosis" was the second episode filmed for Star Trek's second season. The script, written by Gene Coon, has this to say In Act II, Scene 39:
EXT. SHUTTLECRAFT – ANGLE ON SPOCK
He has a ray-generator of some sort in hand...
< snip >
So, the earliest reference to this device is as a "ray-generator." Later, Stephen Whitfield took pictures of this prop for his book The Making of Star Trek. In that book he called the device a "(Spock Built) Ray Generator and Energy Neutralizer." (Although there is no reference to Spock having cobbled this device together out of available components while the Galileo was stranded, perhaps Whitfield thought Spock did exactly that.)
<snip>
Greg Schnitzer
Property Master
Star Trek Phase II
Unless I'm mistaken, which is *highly* unlikely, this was known as the "Phynburg Oscillating Framizam"
I'm not kidding. Many of the props were given names based on Irving Feinberg, the prop master.
The term "ray-generator" first appears in the script for the episode "Metamorphosis" (which is where this prop makes its first appearance). "Metamorphosis" was the second episode filmed for Star Trek's second season. The script, written by Gene Coon, has this to say In Act II, Scene 39:
EXT. SHUTTLECRAFT – ANGLE ON SPOCK
He has a ray-generator of some sort in hand...
< snip >
So, the earliest reference to this device is as a "ray-generator." Later, Stephen Whitfield took pictures of this prop for his book The Making of Star Trek. In that book he called the device a "(Spock Built) Ray Generator and Energy Neutralizer." (Although there is no reference to Spock having cobbled this device together out of available components while the Galileo was stranded, perhaps Whitfield thought Spock did exactly that.)
<snip>
Greg Schnitzer
Property Master
Star Trek Phase II
Unless I'm mistaken, which is *highly* unlikely, this was known as the "Phynburg Oscillating Framizam"
I'm not kidding. Many of the props were given names based on Irving Feinberg, the prop master.
Kirk here, I like fun names, especially one better than a "ray generator", but would you care to give us some documentation on this? Greg has.
The term "ray-generator" first appears in the script for the episode "Metamorphosis" (which is where this prop makes its first appearance). "Metamorphosis" was the second episode filmed for Star Trek's second season. The script, written by Gene Coon, has this to say In Act II, Scene 39:
EXT. SHUTTLECRAFT--ANGLE ON SPOCK
He has a ray-generator of some sort in hand...
< snip >
So, the earliest reference to this device is as a "ray-generator." Later, Stephen Whitfield took pictures of this prop for his book The Making of Star Trek. In that book he called the device a "(Spock Built) Ray Generator and Energy Neutralizer." (Although there is no reference to Spock having cobbled this device together out of available components while the Galileo was stranded, perhaps Whitfield thought Spock did exactly that.)
<snip>
Greg Schnitzer
Property Master
Star Trek Phase II
Unless I'm mistaken, which is *highly* unlikely, this was known as the "Phynburg Oscillating Framizam"
I'm not kidding. Many of the props were given names based on Irving Feinberg, the prop master.
Kirk here, I like fun names, especially one better than a "ray generator", but would you care to give us some documentation on this? Greg has.
When Franz Joseph Schnaubelt wrote his now famous Star Fleet Technical Manual, he created reasonably accurate drawings of this device and called it an "Anabolic Protoplaser."
![]()
When Franz Joseph Schnaubelt wrote his now famous Star Fleet Technical Manual, he created reasonably accurate drawings of this device and called it an "Anabolic Protoplaser."
![]()
This prop was re-created for ST:TMP based on FJ's size and color spec's, you can see Dr. Chapel with it in sickbay when Spock is recovering from his incounter with V'ger.
I always thought it rather cool that the 3' model of the Enterprise was used as a show-prop in Requiem for Methuselah. Nice to see the actors in the same shot as the E, though in shrunken form.
http://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/3x19/requiemformethuselah_383.jpg
http://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/3x19/requiemformethuselah_391.jpg
Does anyone know the history of this model? Why it was made and its fate? Is this the same model that Nimoy is holding in some early promo shots?
Well, Kirk here actually is incorrect--and it could indeed be because Bjo's information was incorrect. (It sounds like Dorothy Jones and Bjo simply have a wrong sketch assigned to this entry in her old book. Her more recent edition of the Concordance doesn't have this error.)
Uhm, I believe this is a far too literal interpretation of the script. It is clear from internal memos between Roddenberry and Justman (see, for example, p. 342-346 of TMoST) that throw-away names (often times as jokes, as you noted) involving some form of Irving Feinberg's name were used to describe generic gadgets. Thus, "Irvingoscope" and "Phynberg oscillating Framizam" were simply scripted placeholders for two different gadgets used in the same scene. Interestingly, in the same script, and immediately before this scene, Charlie moves towards the foreground "...where a crewman is working on a wall unit with a Phynberg oscillating Framizam." This is the scene where Charlie watches the crewman lower the rod (the directors likely interpretation of the Feinberg gadget) into the floor.At any rate, the point of all this is that the script calls this thing a "Phynburg Oscillating Framizam" and the other prop in this scene held by Crewman II--who is still in the Jefferies tube (and which we won't get into here) is an "Irvingoscope." Of course, these are both studio in-jokes. Irving Feinberg was the Property Master on Star Trek and was responsible for procuring and maintaining all the props. This is the one and only script where this "Phynburg Oscillating Framizam" term is used and, despite what the old Concordance might say, relates to this red, black and silver doohickey.
Well, Kirk here actually is incorrect--and it could indeed be because Bjo's information was incorrect. (It sounds like Dorothy Jones and Bjo simply have a wrong sketch assigned to this entry in her old book. Her more recent edition of the Concordance doesn't have this error.)
It has been well documented that, unfortunately, there were errors in all versions of the Concordance.
Uhm, I believe this is a far too literal interpretation of the script. It is clear from internal memos between Roddenberry and Justman (see, for example, p. 342-346 of TMoST) that throw-away names (often times as jokes, as you noted) involving some form of Irving Feinberg's name were used to describe generic gadgets. Thus, "Irvingoscope" and "Phynberg oscillating Framizam" were simply scripted placeholders for two different gadgets used in the same scene. Interestingly, in the same script, and immediately before this scene, Charlie moves towards the foreground "...where a crewman is working on a wall unit with a Phynberg oscillating Framizam." This is the scene where Charlie watches the crewman lower the rod (the directors likely interpretation of the Feinberg gadget) into the floor.At any rate, the point of all this is that the script calls this thing a "Phynburg Oscillating Framizam" and the other prop in this scene held by Crewman II--who is still in the Jefferies tube (and which we won't get into here) is an "Irvingoscope." Of course, these are both studio in-jokes. Irving Feinberg was the Property Master on Star Trek and was responsible for procuring and maintaining all the props. This is the one and only script where this "Phynburg Oscillating Framizam" term is used and, despite what the old Concordance might say, relates to this red, black and silver doohickey.
In the more modern Trek series, the word "TECH" was often used as a placeholder for a gadget.
Best,
Dave
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.