Personally, I wouldn't even consider people that didn't predict every single round. So yeah, if two people have the same % the person that predicted more rounds is IMO the winner. As for the people that are tied, well nothing wrong with that.As someone who no longer has a pony in this race I've got to say that both teams did remarkably well and both of them deserve the cup. I'm hoping that the Pens win game 6 if only to bring it to a barn burner of a seventh game.
Now I need you folks' opinion. You know the hockey prediction thread, we'll I've added up the conference quarters, semis and finals and I've got three ties. One of the ties is easily broken since the two people only participated in the quarters so I'll just use the tie-breaker of that round which is the first person who posted.
Another tie-breaker will solve itself if the Pens win but if not, I've got two people who will have predicted the same X number of winning teams off by the same Y number of games. One person participated once, the other at every single stage; who should be placed higher: the one who showed up more often or the one who, when he showed up, did tremendously well?
The third tie had both people participate at all four stages and made the exact same prediction for the Stanley Cup finals and I can't figure a tiebreaker for this situation.
Savor the flavor, Bonz. It won't happen again.![]()
As for the people that are tied, well nothing wrong with that.
I swear .... the last 30 seconds of a hockey match when the difference is 1 goal or none, are among the most nerve-wracking in sports. That last shot tonigh.... it looked like one inch more to the right, and the game is tied as time runs out.
Congrats to the Red Wings!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.