Mikkos Cassadine!The only daytime soap I ever watched religiously was the original Dark Shadows back in the day, although I'll cop to watching General Hospital one summer because my best friend was hooked on it, so we always had to make sure we were in front of a tv at the appointed hour.
And just to bring this back to Star Trek, that was the summer John Colicos (aka "Kor") was out to destroy Port Charles with a freezing ray.
Really.
I think SNW conclusively disproves this idea. Thanks to the efforts of the cast, even some extremely shaky scripts come across way better than they have any business doing.As a general rule I've always held that it all starts with the writing. If you have good writing, any competent troupe of actors can pull it off. If you have bad writing, good acting can't help that.
I think SNW conclusively disproves this idea. Thanks to the efforts of the cast, even some extremely shaky scripts come across way better than they have any business doing.
Q is swapping between uniforms from human history. The intent of the scene is clear, Q is dressed as a human judge of 2079 or whatever after we dispense with all the United Earth nonsense (man, we can only hope). They could have explicitly had the Q adopt it as some sort of semi-official uniform with a line of dialogue about appreciating how efficient that particular court was or something along those lines.![]()
It kind of already did that with Voyager.
Plus, the courtroom is the thing described as accurate in Encounter at Farpoint, not Q's outfit.
Hardly a double standard. The VOY screenshot isn't much of a gotcha considering that scene is literally in the Major Grin video and implied to be stupid as well. But @fireproof78 explicitly said he would never 'give a click' to Major Grin, hence he wouldn't have known that.Well, whaddya know - people holding the Kurtzman era to a double standard again?
I'm shocked. Well, not that shocked.
Nah. The Q court robes are an iconic visual. So why not use them? Probably a deliberate choice with no need for a time wasting “explanation.”But they didn't, so it's reasonable to conclude that Voyager and SNW simply messed up to varying degrees.
Really? I didn't find it clear because the mobile chair seems odd in a post atomic horror.The intent of the scene is clear, Q is dressed as a human judge of 2079
Interesting. I never read his robes as being the court of the post atomic horror given his presentation was more theatrical compared to the mundane setting.It's just Roddenberry's and 1987's interpretation of a postnuclear judge's robes, especially when you consider that the courtroom appears to have a heavy population of ethnic Asian war survivors. Gene probably thought it looked more exotic and "Eastern."
Just to be clear, that’s across ALL of Star Trek, not just “the new stuff”.The writing on SNW is quite good, especially as compared to other Star Trek.
Nope.No. They probably would have ignored humanity as being beneath their notice Trelane passing his exam is what brought the attention of curiosity to the Q.
Nope.
Remember, the thing with Trelane has to come after Q and the Grey, because Q and the Grey was very specifically the first time the Q reproduced.
The Q are linear.True. But the Q aren't linear. That might be why.
I mean, the thing with Amanda Rogers also obviously occurred after The Q and the Grey.Poor Amanda Rogers
Only in so far as to support the narrative that current producers hate Star Trek.The robes were a nice touch.
Oh, i'm sorry, is this supposed to be a big deal?
The robes always looked very European to me.It's just Roddenberry's and 1987's interpretation of a postnuclear judge's robes, especially when you consider that the courtroom appears to have a heavy population of ethnic Asian war survivors. Gene probably thought it looked more exotic and "Eastern."
It was a great episodeWow I didn't check this thread for a couple of days and it's already almost doubled in length.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.