Ellison money at this pointIt's only someone else's money, right?![]()
Ellison money at this pointIt's only someone else's money, right?![]()
Hard to find a new fan base on a streaming service.Even if young people watched traditional tv.
These things aren’t cheap and frankly Trek is all I watch on Paramount…(everything else seems Stetson adjacent).As soon as Trek has run its course I won’t be a customer for much longer.
You mean the show that never finished higher than 51st in the ratings during its original run?
Less choices =more viewersBut even back than with a much smaller U.S. population it had a lot more viewers than any kurtzman trek has ever achieved
Most shows today can only dream of getting the ratings that the middle of the road shows got back then.Less choices =more viewers
Indeed. It's an entirely different market so the ratings comparison yields false results because not all factors are considered.Most shows today can only dream of getting the ratings that the middle of the road shows got back then.
Less choices =more viewers
Most shows today can only dream of getting the ratings that the middle of the road shows got back then.
And the potential audience of science fiction is smaller and more niche with more choices.Theres was actually quite a few shows on back than and nearly 3 times the episides per season than we have today. So people had to be choosy as well. Also today streaming of a show is all over the world. So when we in the states are watching a new trek someone in another country probably is. Not true in the 1960s. The population of tge U.S. in the 60s was just slightly over half of what it is today. Star Trek also wasnt shown worldwide until after its cancelation and run. So the potential audience of first run eps was much much smaller than it is today.
And the potential audience of science fiction is smaller and more niche with more choices.
If we want Star Trek to return to the 60s it's going to take more than just more viewership. Fan engagement, and finding success praiseworthy over just meh, "it's not it's not like Mom's cooking."
That's how fans talk and they're not encouraging at all.
Yet, with only three available networks to watch, millions more people were watching television then than even today.But even back than with a much smaller U.S. population it had a lot more viewers than any kurtzman trek has ever achieved.
Yes. Jörg Hillebrand confirms it IS a martini Boyce is drinking in this episode.
![]()
but it wasn't convenient to my schedule
So, no harm, no foul.The streaming era is just as dead as what was left in the wake of Enterprise
![]()
People showed at least some interest in Disco S1. Later shows are difficult to distinguish from background radiation.
I loved 1883 and 1923. Im just disappointed there hasn't been an update on the next series in that lineI liked 1883 and 1923. Michelle watched Landman, but it wasn't convenient to my schedule. Generally, I'll watch anything with Sam Elliott.
Any of it is better TV than any of Paramount+ Trek other than SNW.
Yes. Jörg Hillebrand confirms it IS a martini Boyce is drinking in this episode.

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.