• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

On the origin of the "Gimmick Episode" in SNW...(Spoilers)

eschaton

Vice Admiral
Admiral
Hey guys,

There's been a lot of discussion about the increasing frequency of "gimmick episodes" in SNW, so I thought I'd take a look across the series to see if we can peg their origin.

We might have different definitions of what makes something a gimmick episode, but I think it comes down to one or more of the following three:
  • An episode which takes a big swing outside of the core Trek wheelhouse.
  • An episode which can be broadly summarized as "What if ____, but in Star Trek."
  • An episode which is very clearly meant as a homage to some other form of media.
Anyway looking through the seasons.

Season 1: At first, I thought gimmicks were entirely absent from the first season, as most of the episodes are simple sci-fi tales which help to introduce and deepen the characters without much in terms of high concept. The one comedy (Spock Amok) plays with body swap tropes, but isn't what I'd call a gimmick. And while Lift Us Where Suffering Cannot Reach is a pretty shameless lifting of Omelas into Star Trek, it's enough of a deep cut that I don't think It counts. The Elysian Kingdom plays with some fantasy tropes, but it doesn't feel that far out of the standard Trek wheelhouse. But the obvious answer here for a first gimmick outing is All Those Who Wander, as it's pretty transparently just guided by the desire to do Alien within Trek, hammering away at what was already established regarding the Gorn until they somehow could work here. I think it's the sole real gimmick. (1 episode)

Season 2: The two clear big swings were Those Old Scientists and Subspace Rhapsody, which were both gimmicky concepts (crossover and musical), but ended up being among the greatest successes of the series, building up quite a lot of confidence on the part of the writing team. Aside from that, though the season was pretty normal Star Trek. The other comedy (Charades) had a silly concept, but wasn't really a gimmick, and the rest of the season was a mixture of character drama and a few high-octane action outings. (2 episodes)

Season 3: The gimmicking and the genre play began to snowball here. We get zombies (Shuttle to Kenfori), a holodeck murder mystery meant as a love letter to TOS's production (A Space Adventure Hour), and an in-universe documentary (What is Starfleet?). One can argue that The Sehlat Who Ate its Tail was a gimmick of a sort (albeit an effective one) since it seems constructed to be a backdoor pilot of sorts for Year One. I will say though that although it was an awful episode, Four-and-a-Half Vulcans is not really a gimmick - it just continues the pattern of Spock-centered comedies that deal with body transformation. (3 episodes)

Season 4: Seems like we've reached critical mass. In the first half of the season, at least four out of the five episodes are constructed with the "What if _____ in Star Trek?" concept, making them gimmicks, regardless of how effective/ineffective they are. While Valles Marineris is arguably not a gimmick, it plays so heavily on Barsoomian tropes I'd argue that it's from the same wheelhouse. And we know in the back half at the very least Like Chronitons Through the Hourglass and Once La'an a Time will be big swings as well. (6 episodes - maybe even more).

What I conclude here is gimmicks and/or "big swings" really don't seem to have taken off until this season. People complained about them last season, but TBH, there weren't that many more than in Season 2. It's just that Season 3 just wasn't very good for unrelated reasons (a bad comedy outing, too much focus on romances, an attempt at a season arc that went nowhere, etc.)
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure it matters what nomenclature is used; we all know what he's talking about.

And honestly, when your show doesn't have any kind of real plot to speak of, then it doesn't matter how many gimmick episodes there are.
 
I think if you write an episode just so you can do a thing, it is a gimmick. If the thing happens because of the story, it's not. So Subspace Rhapsody, IMO is a gimmick. They just happened to do it well. (YMMV.)

Edit to add: But I think because the episodes in previous seasons mostly worked, they feel like they're giving the audience more of what they (we) responded too. Which is it's own problem. Write the story. If it's good, the audience will show up. But trying to write to cater to the audience always seems to backfire in the end.
 
Last edited:
I think if you write an episode just so you can do a thing, it is a gimmick. If the thing happens because of the story, it's not. So Subspace Rhapsody, IMO is a gimmick. They just happened to do it well. (YMMV.)

Edit to add: But I think because the episodes in previous seasons mostly worked, they feel like they're giving the audience more of what they (we) responded too. Which is it's own problem. Write the story. If it's good, the audience will show up. But trying to write to cater to the audience always seems to backfire in the end.
Yes. The catering to expectations is the biggest flaw in Star Trek writing in my opinion. It's trying to appeal to the fan service side, thinking about how this will play to the audience. It's taking your eye off the ball in terms of storytelling.

I personally just look at current output and feel there is a level of fearing the audience vs. writing a story the writers like and feel passionate about enough to write.
 
Yeah gimmicks are fine if the result is good.

I think (personally) the problem with some of the ones from seasons 3 and 4 is that they feel like they come from a place of "What else can we do?!"
 
Calling something a "gimmick episode" is just a thing disgruntled fans do.

They're not gimmicks.
Yep, exactly.

TOS did plenty of 'gimmick' episodes - some examples:

- Catspaw: A Halloween themed episode chilling around that time of year.

- Patterns Of Force: TOS makes a World War II movie about getting to Der Furher.

- Friday's Clild: classic 'noble savages' Western here. Two groups of settlers need something from the Indians, so they go to negotiate, have some local customs incidents on both sides, but eventually the good guys prevail.

- Paradise Syndrome: Western settler goes native due to accident.

- Specter of the Gun: Gun Fight at the OK Corral.

- A Piece of the Action: Star Trek does a 1930s era Ganster film with comedic elements.

- Bread and Circuses: Star Trek's take on various sword and sandal films from the 50s and 60s.
 
Thank you for your thoughtful analysis. Some people zoom in to shut you down as is the way, but I like how you articulated what you think of as a gimmick and how that would be applied to the show.

QED...

Calling something a "gimmick episode" is just a thing disgruntled fans do.

They're not gimmicks.

I keep seeing this take and variations of it in this forum. You are a disgruntled fan, ergo your thoughts are invalid and thus criticism of Star Trek is invalid too. It's a neat way of delegitimising any discussion or criticism. On the week of puppets it's also quite bold! But not only do I not agree with that stance, you're also taking an entirely negative view on gimmicks.

I would say Q-Pid is almost entirely a gimmick but I love it. You could argue Sisko meeting Kirk is a gimmick but it was executed very well. The Enterprise D crew being in the Enterprise finale is a gimmick... well that one has caused disgruntled fans and they have a reason for that.

Back to OP's post, I have a couple I probably invert. For me the Elysian Kingdom was straight up gimmick and started the process. I am slightly more forgiving of the zombies as being less a gimmick as I have seen all sorts of weird and wonderful creatures and aliens in Star Trek and then it's just a bit of wink wink.

And in relation to your last point I like a big swing, but I like it now and again. It's a contrast and a palate cleanser for me in Star Trek, it shouldn't be the main course. I'd love for them to explore a strange new world some time, and find some new races and civilisations.
 
Last edited:
(repost!)

It seems like the identity of the show shifted at some point from "let's try to make a 'classic' Star Trek show in a modern production pipeline" to "this show is a homage to 90s genre TV and thus we need to do a puppet episode and a noir episode and whatnot".
That's a very fair analysys. I much prefer season one for this very reason. I dont mind the occasional homage, which is what these gimick episodes really are, but they have went overboard this season. They even straight up ripped off a scene from Casablanca in that neo noir black and white episode. Even the next episode coming out, according to the writers, is an homage to disaster films.
 
Yep, exactly.

TOS did plenty of 'gimmick' episodes - some examples:

- Catspaw: A Halloween themed episode chilling around that time of year.

- Patterns Of Force: TOS makes a World War II movie about getting to Der Furher.

- Friday's Clild: classic 'noble savages' Western here. Two groups of settlers need something from the Indians, so they go to negotiate, have some local customs incidents on both sides, but eventually the good guys prevail.

- Paradise Syndrome: Western settler goes native due to accident.

- Specter of the Gun: Gun Fight at the OK Corral.

- A Piece of the Action: Star Trek does a 1930s era Ganster film with comedic elements.

- Bread and Circuses: Star Trek's take on various sword and sandal films from the 50s and 60s.

I don't think most of these are gimmick episodes (maybe Catspaw), because they had deeper meanings- even if the episodes themselves weren't that good or didn't age well.(I am not a fan of Friday's Child or Paradise Syndrome.) But Patterns of Force is about the appeal of totalitarianism (especially if you're the one in charge...), Friday's Child to me was about how superpowers can affect nations with less power but have resource they want, etc.

There is a difference betwen the premise as a set up for a story with meaning and the premise being the story. This last episode feels like it was them being puppets for being puppets sake.
 
Perhaps the difference is in big ideas (philosophy, policy, ideology) vs small ideas (my life circumstances, my choices, my traumas as experienced by me) Speaking to each person individually versus imparting wisdom to a class of viewer-students. Implying vs just coming out and saying it. Making people think instead of telling them exactly what to think, do, and believe.
 
Yep, exactly.

TOS did plenty of 'gimmick' episodes - some examples:

- Catspaw: A Halloween themed episode chilling around that time of year.

- Patterns Of Force: TOS makes a World War II movie about getting to Der Furher.

- Friday's Clild: classic 'noble savages' Western here. Two groups of settlers need something from the Indians, so they go to negotiate, have some local customs incidents on both sides, but eventually the good guys prevail.

- Paradise Syndrome: Western settler goes native due to accident.

- Specter of the Gun: Gun Fight at the OK Corral.

- A Piece of the Action: Star Trek does a 1930s era Ganster film with comedic elements.

- Bread and Circuses: Star Trek's take on various sword and sandal films from the 50s and 60s.

"Balance of Terror", a direct riff on The Enemy Below. "Arena", a direct copy of the Fredric Brown story of the same name. "The Trouble with Tribbles" is a pretty direct lift of Flat Cat concept.


And how many times did Berman-era Trek redo Enemy Mine.
 
SNW doing genre stuff isn't what (some) people are objecting to, I think, it's the way it goes about it. There's a sort of metafictional knowingness to it that I can't articulate very well.

The puppet episode and the Casablanca episode both have some good examples - TOS absolutely could have done both (though the puppets might have been a stretch), but in both cases, SNW can't stop winking at you that this is what it's doing. Uhura gets a line directly from Casablanca, Ortegas comments that "this premise is ridiculous" in the puppets ep, etc.

I'm saying this as someone who enjoyed both, especially the puppet one. The situations don't feel like they're happening organically in-universe in the way something like "A Piece of the Action" or "Spectre of the Gun" does (the latter obviously being intended as a straight surreal sci-fi drama and not a "let's do a WESTERN episode!" genre piece); they have to keep stopping to reassure you that the show knows what it's doing.

The obvious thing to ask to everyone would be whether or not the last two SNW scripts - with no changes at all - would fit tonally into TOS. I don't think either would. That's a good thing because it's SNW's defining characteristic that separates it from past Star Trek, but I don't think it's accurate to do the usual "Star Trek has always been exactly like this, no discussion here" move - the show does have an approach that's distinct from TOS, and which will alienate plenty of people.
 
Last edited:
SNW doing genre stuff isn't what (some) people are objecting to, I think, it's the way it goes about it. There's a sort of metafictional knowingness to it that I can't articulate very well.

Is that an actual problem with the show or a byproduct of many people being fans of the franchise for so long and having their expectations challenged?
 
Is that an actual problem with the show or a byproduct of many people being fans of the franchise for so long and having their expectations challenged?
Not sure what you mean; what expectations does SNW challenge? It's very much in the - to use the dreaded word - Whedon mold that's been standard for 20~ years, where characters are expected to constantly comment on the fact that the situations they're in are ridiculous, and the production is expected to wink to the camera often.
 
Whedon mold that's been standard for 20~ years, where characters are expected to constantly comment on the fact that the situations they're in are ridiculous, and the production is expected to wink to the camera often.

I've been critical of the Kurtzman years, never felt they were winking at the camera. It is a real credit to the cast that they can make some of these concepts work without it feeling silly, at least in my opinion. They buy all into whatever the concept is in any given week and give it their all.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top