• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Streaming era missed opportunities

This. All of this. Trekkies take themselves way too seriously. If we can't poke fun at some of the more ridiculous elements of our fandom, such as those who put Terry Matalas on a pedestal and worship him as the savior of Trek and the second coming of Gene, then there's something wrong.

I agree. We fans do need to loosen up and not take things so serious. It is what The Matalas would want from us all!
 
It’s not directed to you and most fans of season three. It’s directed towards those who treat Matalas as the savior of Star Trek when truthfully his one season is very divided. Like much of Star Trek. Even my favorite, SNW, which I more than understand is not everyone’s cup of tea. If people were praising Akiva like he was the only one who could save Star Trek, I’d probably make the same joke there.

At the end of the day, it’s a joke. Trekkies need to learn to laugh at themselves sometimes, because we absolutely can be ridiculous about our love of this franchise.

Terry didn't save all of Trek but he did save Picard. After the first two awful seasons we got a more traditional Trek adventure. But no he did not save modern trek. There's too much bad stuff out there to have had decent a season of STP save it.
 
Terry didn't save all of Trek but he did save Picard. After the first two awful seasons we got a more traditional Trek adventure. But no he did not save modern trek. There's too much bad stuff out there to have had decent a season of STP save it.
No.

He told a modern mystery box story that appealed to nostalgia. It didn't "save" anything because Star Trek is not a damsel in distress needing saving.
 
No.

He told a modern mystery box story that appealed to nostalgia. It didn't "save" anything because Star Trek is not a damsel in distress needing saving.

As others have said, the story (read: mystery box) was window dressing for the nostalgia. If that appeals to someone, cool.

But I’m not a fan.

So no, it doesn’t “save” anything. It’s a take on a premise that some appreciate and some don’t.

That is literally it.
 
As others have said, the story (read: mystery box) was window dressing for the nostalgia. If that appeals to someone, cool.

But I’m not a fan.

So no, it doesn’t “save” anything. It’s a take on a premise that some appreciate and some don’t.

That is literally it.
Better out than I did.


The appeal will always be based on acceptance of the premise. I personally could not .

Mileage will vary
 
No.

He told a modern mystery box story that appealed to nostalgia. It didn't "save" anything because Star Trek is not a damsel in distress needing saving.
It's kinda funny to me that season 3 is supposedly so different from the other serialized Trek shows, even though it does the exact same thing that was so problematic in multiple seasons of Discovery - waiting too long to reveal the answer of the mystery box, which ends up being underwhelming.
 
It's kinda funny to me that season 3 is supposedly so different from the other serialized Trek shows, even though it does the exact same thing that was so problematic in multiple seasons of Discovery - waiting too long to reveal the answer of the mystery box, which ends up being underwhelming.

What makes people go Gaga over season 3?



Well, it’s gotta be LCARS.

:lol:
 
At the end of the day, it’s a joke. Trekkies need to learn to laugh at themselves sometimes, because we absolutely can be ridiculous about our love of this franchise.
I agree. We fans do need to loosen up and not take things so serious. It is what The Matalas would want from us all!
Hyposprays for everyone and enjoy.
:techman: :lol:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Sure is. But of all three seasons the Matalas season is the highest rated on rotten tomatoes.
Which has nothing to do with saving.
It's kinda funny to me that season 3 is supposedly so different from the other serialized Trek shows, even though it does the exact same thing that was so problematic in multiple seasons of Discovery - waiting too long to reveal the answer of the mystery box, which ends up being underwhelming.
Indeed.

My biggest frustration with the season is how it repeats plot points from Season 1 (Data returns, secret child, Starfleet officer is a jerk to Picard) but yet Season 3 gets a pass with it's use of nostalgia, while giving a thin story, and actively treating most anyone not the heroes as incompetent, jerks or replaceable.

The messaging is weird and very much a double standard being applied. Characters are out of character, jerks, act like 21st century humans and only old things are reliable. Fir Star Trek that message is confusing.
 
Which has nothing to do with saving.
Indeed.

My biggest frustration with the season is how it repeats plot points from Season 1 (Data returns, secret child, Starfleet officer is a jerk to Picard) but yet Season 3 gets a pass with it's use of nostalgia, while giving a thin story, and actively treating most anyone not the heroes as incompetent, jerks or replaceable.

The messaging is weird and very much a double standard being applied. Characters are out of character, jerks, act like 21st century humans and only old things are reliable. Fir Star Trek that message is confusing.
Well he saved the series success. Season 3 will be the most remembered.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top