• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Americentrism: Except Picard in France....

Well Start Trek plays in a time where there are no more countries and continents.

I am reminded of the following tidbit ->

PARIS: Fort Knox. The largest repository of gold bullion in Earth's history. Over fifty metric tons worth over nine trillion U.S. dollars.
JANEWAY: Keep going.
PARIS: Well, er, when the new world economy took shape in the late twenty second century and money went the way of the dinosaur, Fort Knox was turned into a museum.

Also... ->

CRUSHER: By all indications, the Kes are a very unified, very progressive people.
PICARD: But the Prytt are not. They are reclusive to the point of xenophobia.
CRUSHER: Well, think about Earth. What if one of the old nation states, say Australia, had decided not to join the World Government in twenty one fifty? Would that have disqualified us as a Federation member?
 
PARIS: Well, er, when the new world economy took shape in the late twenty second century and money went the way of the dinosaur, Fort Knox was turned into a museum.

Aw man, we have to wait *that* long?
 
PARIS: Well, er, when the new world economy took shape in the late twenty second century and money went the way of the dinosaur, Fort Knox was turned into a museum.

Aw man, we have to wait *that* long?

Don't worry: the third World War is the last hump.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

9b1eb702203722c1eef51930c683b761.gif
 
As I've grown older it does bother me. I mean aside from the practical stuff that it's an American show so American actors and locations are therefore easier.

But it's not just American centric... it's Earth centric. Why are Starfleet vessels always Earth names?

I see specks of diversity more so in the later shows like Picard.

But he show could have made it feel more like a united federation of planets.
 
As I've grown older it does bother me. I mean aside from the practical stuff that it's an American show so American actors and locations are therefore easier.

But it's not just American centric... it's Earth centric. Why are Starfleet vessels always Earth names?

I see specks of diversity more so in the later shows like Picard.

But he show could have made it feel more like a united federation of planets.
i know what you eman, but there are exeptions

like the totally vulcan crew excelsior class USS T'Kumbra in DS9
 
Or sometimes, Cardiff


dJE

Or the North. Lots of planets have a north.

The Doctor of course comes from Galifrey.

Of the Captains and/or leads (so Mariner/Boimler/Ake and anyone who was captain of the main ship for more than a week):

USA 7: Kirk, Sisko, Janeway, Archer. Lorca (according to Isaacs), Pike, Boimler

Unclear Earth 1: Burnham (although raised offworld)

Other Earth 2 : Picard. Rios (Chile)

Non Earth 4: Seven (Tendara), Ransom (Luna), Saru, Dal

Unclear 2: Freeman, Ake
 
As I've grown older it does bother me. I mean aside from the practical stuff that it's an American show so American actors and locations are therefore easier.

But it's not just American centric... it's Earth centric. Why are Starfleet vessels always Earth names?
Because Starfleet was founded on Earth and is headquartered on America, so it kind of follows that it would be heavily influenced there, despite it being an interstellar service. You can't get rid of all aspects of localism. Conversely, if Starfleet was founded on Vulcan, it would have a Vulcan name, and likely wouldn't have that many callbacks to Earth or America, IMO.

In Gene's other creation, Andromeda, Earth was just one of countless planets in the New Systems Commonwealth and not particularly important as far as its government was concerned. The only reason why the titular starship had an Earth-derived name was because it was built there.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Because Starfleet was founded on Earth and is headquartered on America, so it kind of follows that it would be heavily influenced there, despite it being an interstellar service. You can't get rid of all aspects of localism. Conversely, if Starfleet was founded on Vulcan, it would have a Vulcan name, and likely wouldn't have that many callbacks to Earth or America, IMO.

That poses interesting thought about the Federation in general.

Are member countries happy to join, then have their own space fleet disbanded in place of a largely human fleet headquartered from Earth? Personally as a member state I'd fear if they'd defend me as much as Earth. Particularly in an invasion, are they going to save me before Earth?

You could have interesting counter dynamics. Can Federation worlds basically join up and then sit back and think they're protected without contributing anything? Could argumetns similar to what goes on with NATO about certain members not pulling their way take place on a Federation level? Should there be quotas - like a certain amount of the planet population needs to go into certain areas such as defence of the Federation?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top