noThey're basically a tick in a box for the sake of being a tick in the box
That wasn't intended to be a jab, that had everything to do with her character and not her body.

I think that's part of it for me too. It's not specifically their presence, it's that they're there as a trope. They're basically a tick in a box for the sake of being a tick in the box while wearing the trope hat. Personally, that feels a bit reductionist overall, but that's just me.
I'm not sure what trope you're talking about here. SAM's weight (well, Kerrice Brooks's, since I presume SAM is a massless photonic being) looks completely within the average range.
If anything sets her apart, it's that she looks like a normal person, which is pretty striking when set against a bunch of other young actors who were cast in part due to being model-level hot. In general, Hollywood has a hard time casting normal people in roles, and when they do, it's usually reserved for men and/or older actors.
What I fund funny about attempts to be body positive is those characters still tend to be almost exclusively comic relief. Reinforcing the "jolly fat guy" sidekick to the ripped hunk and his model love interest is not being body positive.
I'm speaking of the "trope" mentioned below by TimeIsAPredator about the "jolly fat guy" sidekick/comic relief character.
I was more referring to LT Rork than SAM. I also said that I could be completely wrong about SAM and she could turn out to be a great character.I'm not getting "jolly fat guy" from SAM at all. They seem to be going for the aspie-coded socially awkward thing.
I don't know how you think you are agreeing with me when my post was a rebuttal to your own.I'm speaking of the "trope" mentioned below by TimeIsAPredator about the "jolly fat guy" sidekick/comic relief character.
I was more referring to LT Rork than SAM. I also said that I could be completely wrong about SAM and she could turn out to be a great character.
I don't know how you think you are agreeing with me when my post was a rebuttal to your own.
I have no problem with the fitness.levels of any characters on Academy. In fact we haven't seen their level yet. I do have a problem with people assuming fitness based on size. I know plenty of "Tillys" that are fitter than some "Burnhams" I know which annoyed me when they showed Tilly struggling with the exercise levels.
Academy is 2 episodes in so I'm speaking about the trope in a broader sense. I don't think they ever intend for it to "come across that way" but it ends up that way partly because the creators want to include different body types but deep down sex sells so the lead always looks like Caleb in the end.Rork was portrayed as a “‘jolly fat guy’ sidekick/comic relief character”? Are there perhaps some deleted scenes I haven’t seen, because I can’t recall anything even remotely like that from those first two episodes.
As people have noted elsewhere, I can see an argument for how Cadet Pickford (who also isn’t “fat” by any means) might fall into that rather unfortunate stereotype (“Look, the fat girl is so hungry, she even eats her combadge!”), but I trust that’s not how they wanted it to come across.
The moment people start complaining about things being "woke" -- especially Star Trek --is the moment that I stop taking them seriously as adults.
Casting a Black actress with a normal body type isn’t “ticking a box,” they cast the part based on whomever did the best job auditioning for the role.I think that's part of it for me too. It's not specifically their presence, it's that they're there as a trope. They're basically a tick in a box for the sake of being a tick in the box while wearing the trope hat. Personally, that feels a bit reductionist overall, but that's just me.
I think it's important to note that there's never, ever been "neutral" casting, any more than there is neutral hiring in anything. Even when we aren't consciously going for something, unconscious bias slips in.
An example of this I saw a few years back: In Europe, for example, including head shots is a normal thing for most resumes. It was found that the more attractive men were, the more likely they were to get interviewed. However, the more attractive women were, the less likely they were to get brought in for interviews. They did some further studies and found that it seemed to be because the people who do lower-level HR work at major firms (just as in the U.S.) were largely women - and presumably mostly straight women. The hot men were implicitly interesting to them, whereas the hot women did nothing for them, and they might have been a little biased against them if they saw them as more attractive than they were.
Casting a Black actress with a normal body type isn’t “ticking a box,” they cast the part based on whomever did the best job auditioning for the role.
I bet you wouldn’t make this comment about a white guy being cast in a similar role.
I already said I could be completely wrong about SAM.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.