• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley developing Star Trek reboot for Paramount

Author intent of TMP was that it was separate.

^ Grasping at straws. So-called "author intent" of was never explicitly an official, recognized part of the one ST film he had any influence over (whoops) and his go-nowhere thoughts on revisionist history were clearly ignored by those who knew the material better than he did (which happened more than a few times on TOS, go figure).
 
Its a production with a certain intent which was realized for the sake of said production(s) and its in-universe setting. not some make-up-your-own-adventure novel. The latter option is served by ST fan fiction (and more often than not, that does not work).

You do realize you're replying to an argument never made, right?

Head beginning to spin ...

lizzie-mcguire-lizzie.gif
 
^ Grasping at straws. So-called "author intent" of was never explicitly an official, recognized part of the one ST film he had any influence over (whoops) and his go-nowhere thoughts on revisionist history were clearly ignored by those who knew the material better than he did (which happened more than a few times on TOS, go figure).
No. You can't state intent then state that intent doesn't count. That's a double standard.

It's clear there's no interest in actually having a discussion or any effort at understanding a different point of view but just being right. As usual, I see Trek fans insisting only one way must be treated as gospel. More's the pity :sigh:

I stand by my opinion that the characters in TOS feel different than their film counterparts, and the refit Enterprise doesn't fit as an update to the TOS ship. It's too different for me, as different as Blake's in MASH.

May you find your own way as pleasant.
 
You do realize everything in Star Trek is absolute made up fiction, right?

Absolutely none of it is real; and any actual factual science portrayed is a stroke of luck.

What if Star Trek is real and we are fiction? A holographic reaction of a fake past were the real world was just a tv show people in our century enjoyed watching. Holographic Meta fiction!
 
Or maybe humans created a holographic Star Trek program were the programs became alive because of AI which they then created a holographic past where their reality was a tv show, like mentioned. Now that we are alive we will someday create our own AI Star Trek meta universe and the cycle will continue on and on. We're just a program built by a program built by the real humans.
 
Or maybe humans created a holographic Star Trek program were the programs became alive because of AI which they then created a holographic past where their reality was a tv show, like mentioned. Now that we are alive we will someday create our own AI Star Trek meta universe and the cycle will continue on and on. We're just a program built by a program built by the real humans.
Oh, the brain in a vat theory.*




*2000 Internet points for those catching the reference.
 
Thank you for stating my point. :beer:

I’m confused. You were making a point that the same characters didn’t act alike in different productions by using an example of a character who literally wasn’t the same person from a different production?

TOS Kirk - same guy as TMP Kirk
MASH movie Blake - not the same guy as MASH TV show Blake (and not even the same actor)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top