I agree with this assessment.Disco 1: The show that Brian Fuller sorta maybe wanted. Kind of
Disco 2: The Unintended Prequel Season to Strange New Worlds
Disco 3-5: the actual show.
I still say PS2 was the second-best live action season of Star Trek produced post-2005. You could do a lot with the shot material if you managed some editing and ADR to tighten things up.I'll die on the hill that while it's the worst season of PIC, S2 isn't bad. PIC S2 is still better than the entirety of DSC, and stands right about with mediocre seasons of other Trek.
Discovery makes Picard look really, really bad and that says something about it. Based on my thoughts about Discovery.
I still say PS2 was the second-best live action season of Star Trek produced post-2005. You could do a lot with the shot material if you managed some editing and ADR to tighten things up.
PS1 has much lower lows.
*waves in Worf*but if they decided to go with the dominion story they really should have at least cast one DS9 actor.
aside from him because he was mainly a tng character.*waves in Worf*
But his DS9 knowledge was big part early on.aside from him because he was mainly a tng character.
I also like all three seasons but stopped regularly posting in this forum. This is my third post in the PIC Forum in all of 2025, so far. I agree with how you look at each of the three seasons. I like each for different reasons.I feel like I must be the only one who mostly liked all three seasons of Picard. Each is about a different aspect of Picard’s life, usually in the context of healing. Season 1 is about him simply taking his life back; Season 2 is about healing his past (by healing the past); Season 3 is about him finally finding fatherhood (and arguably that’s doubly symbolized by his old “family” being regathered). Sure, each is different from the others, and has something different to offer; I have no problem with that.
If it's about exploring Jean-Luc Picard, then I might argue that S3 sabotaged if not betrayed that by trying to recreate the past instead of exploring the 'now'. Other than his reunion with Ro and his relations with Crusher (which I don't think were handled very well); I don't readily recall his interactions with his old TNG homies doing much to explore the character.Thing is, Picard isn’t about exploring/sense of wonder* in the TNG sense; it’s about exploring Jean-Luc Picard. That’s its focus, which to my mind is fine, since it says so right there on the tin.
*It does have some, mainly in Season 1, and Season 2’s arc is effectively about finally connecting with a formerly implacable alien (healing, again). Season 3 definitely isn’t about that, which is part of why it rings falsely when they pause for a pious “to seek out new life” moment; that belongs in a different show.
Except that Picard wasn't trying to recreate the past. When Beverly reached out to Picard, he went to Riker. Who he still knows in 2401. Riker has connections to the Titan, which is why he sought him out. He knew he'd need a ship to help Beverly and was looking for any way he could do that. "It's not what you know, it's who you know." So, as far as Picard knew, he was going on the Titan with Riker to rescue Beverly.If it's about exploring Jean-Luc Picard, then I might argue that S3 sabotaged if not betrayed that by trying to recreate the past instead of exploring the 'now'. Other than his reunion with Ro and his relations with Crusher (which I don't think were handled very well); I don't readily recall his interactions with his old TNG homies doing much to explore the character.
As I know I've said before, I really hate the implication that you hit a best point in your life and after that the best you can do is try to recreate the past instead of seeking out new experiences.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.