The last nine years of Star Trek in a concise sentence.Well, that was…nothing.
If you think about the alternate timeline in Tapestry. Picard was like a 64/65 year old Lt. JG
I may simply have not been paying attention and missed it, but can anyone ID the large object visible in the Aquatic Park yacht basin, at time index 0:05 in the trailer?
View attachment 47911
In the screencap above, it's the inverted y-shaped object at lower right.
After the (justifiably) visceral reaction to the s1 Klingons, it's clear that modern Trek shied away from massive visual reboots of other species, including reverting Klingons back to the 24th century design with higher fidelity makeup.But the visual discontinuity for Discovery spin-off is insaner than Discovery to the rest of the franchise itself. It just so odd, it decided to set itself so apart, and then all of its literal spinoffs are like, nah, we'll do it like the rest of the franchise did.
But no advances at all in pedagogy in over a thousand.They were made that way eight hundred years ago. A lot can happen in eight centuries.
That too.Well at least the bridge is still around a millennia from now.
Yeah.But it does make you wonder what the point of leaping forwards all the time is.
My guess is it's some kind of future seagoing vessel.I may simply have not been paying attention and missed it, but can anyone ID the large object visible in the Aquatic Park yacht basin, at time index 0:05 in the trailer?
View attachment 47911
In the screencap above, it's the inverted y-shaped object at lower right.
So much is clear, but with so much attention overpaid recently to made-up “backlashes” and visceral fan reactions to things that were nothing, I've found myself wishing less attention was paid to those, I almost wish they had stuck with it, given that it was just a look, even though I wasn't overly fond of it at the start. Certainly being too shy to show a single Klingon in several seasons was going too far, regardless of what design choice they took.After the (justifiably) visceral reaction to the s1 Klingons, it's clear that modern Trek shied away from massive visual reboots of other species, including reverting Klingons back to the 24th century design with higher fidelity makeup.
I know I'm just reiterating a silly fan wish with this, and probably wouldn't have worked as great as it sounds in my head, but that all greatly summarises why I wish they had done the bold thing at the end of the search for “the Federation” on their arrival in the 32nd century, and simply found it on/near Qo'noS, with Klingons as head of Starfleet and many other key positions. Conceptually, it's the same as what they did with Unification III and the Romulan demographic on Ni'var overwhelmingly voting to stay in the Federation, and how that felt for Burnham to hear, but it was closer to the war the crew had just gone through, and what us as audience had witnessed.Yeah.
Theoretically, it's a move to wipe the slate clean. Yet look at all these familiar species all mixed and matched. Apparently, we're supposed to think it's important that one of our main characters is a Klingon. It looks like they're going to be completely unable to tell a story without referencing the fuck out of standing canon, even though they've provided themselves with an opportunity to start from scratch.
Tig Notaro had excellent chemistry with Rapp. It was fun seeing two equally but differently irascible trying to work together. I wish they'd found a way to somehow get her back to SNW instead of yet another irascible engineer character we have now.I'm fully onboard because Robert Picardo is on it and hopefully Jet Reno is actually a regular cast member who shows up every episode.
I'm glad they're not having everyone wear/use the GODAWFUL ST: D S4 and S5 crew uniforms.The only thing that looked interesting was Giamatti at the end. The rest just looks like your average teen angst with a Star Trek coat of paint.
I remember someone commenting, and I can't recall the reference now, that the Discovery Bridge set was in pretty bad shape by season 3.I'm glad they're not having everyone wear/use the GODAWFUL ST: D S4 and S5 crew uniforms.
And I guess they did destroy a number of Discovery sets because the Bridge set Holly Hunter walks onto is a redress of the SNW Enterprise Bridge set.
I thought they filmed at separate studios.I'm glad they're not having everyone wear/use the GODAWFUL ST: D S4 and S5 crew uniforms.
And I guess they did destroy a number of Discovery sets because the Bridge set Holly Hunter walks onto is a redress of the SNW Enterprise Bridge set.
The only thing that looked interesting was Giamatti at the end. The rest just looks like your average teen angst with a Star Trek coat of paint.
Well, that was…nothing.
There are millennia old buildings still in use today. Though they tend to be religious sites. I think one of the oldest is the Pantheon in Rome which is now the Basilica of St. Mary and the Martyrs.I find it silly to think some of the buildings they show in San Francisco will still be standing in the next millennia.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.