• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC Cinematic Universe ( The James Gunn era)

My thoughts about casting characters for adaptations, especially iconic ones, is that they should get them as close a physical match as possible so I can just look at them and think 'yeah, that's the character'.

If they were only casting models, sure, but with actors, capturing the character's personality should matter more than what they look like. And casting decisions also have to be based on an actor's rapport with the rest of the cast. There'd be no point casting a Reed Richards who was the spitting image of the comics character if he were a mediocre actor or had no romantic chemistry with the actress playing Sue. Embodying the character is not just about what's on the surface.

And of course, when you're adapting older materials where all the characters were white and most were male due to the prejudices of the era, adhering to that is just a way of excluding most of the pool of potential actors who could do a great job with their characters.



That depends if your reference is the movies or the novels. In the novels, Bond is not supposed to be an extremely handsome man. IIRC he has a distinguished scar on his face and his face also reflects the damage he's taken over the years. If you are going with how Bond is supposed to look based on the source material then Dalton and Craig are probably the closest. Moore and Brosnan are the furthest from. And Lazenby is probably passable, although he had one movie. Connery is my movie Bond and brought his own distinct take to the character.

Fleming described Bond as resembling the actor Hoagy Carmichael, but more cruel-looking.
 
Mike Ryan (Uproxx) posted on bsky:

"I’m going to get in trouble for this. But that “leaked review,” good god I couldn’t disagree more."

followed by -

"Seems I’m already in enough trouble, “but whatever this mystery movie is,” it’s the happiest I’ve walked out of a movie since Top Gun Maverick. Again, I will never reveal the movie I’m talking about."
Then, Brian Hiatt (Rolling Stone) quoted Mike -

"Without saying anything else, Mike's right here."
-------------------

Embargo? What embargo? :lol:
This is marvelous. :lol:

Some fair context:


Not-so-fair context, but enjoyable:

Screenshot_2025-07-05_092952.jpg
 
Last edited:
My thoughts about casting characters for adaptations, especially iconic ones, is that they should get them as close a physical match as possible so I can just look at them and think 'yeah, that's the character'.

Pom Klementieff literally had comic-book-purple hair at one point, so that's good enough for me!
Ah yes, purple hair, that immutable physical characteristic...
 
If they were only casting models, sure, but with actors, capturing the character's personality should matter more than what they look like. And casting decisions also have to be based on an actor's rapport with the rest of the cast. There'd be no point casting a Reed Richards who was the spitting image of the comics character if he were a mediocre actor or had no romantic chemistry with the actress playing Sue. Embodying the character is not just about what's on the surface.
I'm sure the pool of potential actors is big enough that they can tick all the boxes they want to, talent, chemistry, looks etc. and still have enough options left to go with someone called Chris. They won't ever need to hire a white guy to play Blade because he's got the best rapport.

And of course, when you're adapting older materials where all the characters were white and most were male due to the prejudices of the era, adhering to that is just a way of excluding most of the pool of potential actors who could do a great job with their characters.
This is an actual problem.

One way they solve it is by keeping the most iconic characters the same and changing the Perry White-tier supporting cast, which has a side effect of making it so only the white characters are important. Fine for one movie, not something that'll work with a movie series.

Another way is to hire actors I'm personally fond of, like Samuel L. Jackson, Jason Momoa and Pom Klementieff so I have to throw up my hands and go 'okay fine, you win this time comic book movie people'. The flaw in with this one is this only works for people who like the actors as much as I do (and people who don't care at all, obviously).

But I think the most satisfying solution to this problem is to make a Static Shock movie, put Black Lightning in a film etc., get these heroes on the screen already. No one wants black Peter Parker, they want Miles Morales. We're actually getting Mr Terrific soon, as a major character in the most important DC movie, looking absolutely comic-perfect. I'm interested in seeing who they bring in next.
 
Comics have tried to diversify their casts in recent years, so we have a Black Batman right now. It's not Bruce Wayne. It's Jace Fox. A way to address this in the Gunnverse is to have Bruce Wayne appear in movies that are not exclusively Batman movies, like "Brave and the Bold" or The Outsiders or Justice League.

And then give the full on Batman movie to Jace Fox, along with his siblings as a supporting cast.


This also works by giving the big Lantern role to John Stewart, Jessica Cruz, or Simon Baz. Or even do a full on space movie with Jo Mullein. Jemisin's Far Sector story is ready made for a science fiction movie.
 
I'm sure the pool of potential actors is big enough that they can tick all the boxes they want to, talent, chemistry, looks etc. and still have enough options left to go with someone called Chris.

That's a facile assumption. If it were true, a lot more actors would look like the comics characters, because it makes no sense to assume that isn't a consideration at all.

It also doesn't make sense as an argument, because usually there are only one or two top candidates who meet all the necessary parameters of talent, personality, rapport, availability, etc., and there's no guarantee that the single best candidate in every other respect will also be a dead ringer. Often you have to choose between different priorities, and it should not be difficult to understand that a good actor is more important than a good lookalike.



This is an actual problem.

One way they solve it is by keeping the most iconic characters the same and changing the Perry White-tier supporting cast, which has a side effect of making it so only the white characters are important. Fine for one movie, not something that'll work with a movie series.

I'm not sure what you're defining as a problem. Casting diverse actors in lead roles is NOT a problem and never has been. Lynda Carter is Latina, and she made a great Wonder Woman. Dean Cain is a quarter Japanese (though he doesn't choose to identify as such), and he made an effective Superman.


Another way is to hire actors I'm personally fond of, like Samuel L. Jackson, Jason Momoa and Pom Klementieff so I have to throw up my hands and go 'okay fine, you win this time comic book movie people'. The flaw in with this one is this only works for people who like the actors as much as I do (and people who don't care at all, obviously).

You're making the mistake of assuming that this is only about what the audience wants. Actors are not just passive objects placed before an audience. They are human beings who are working for a living, who need to feed and house their families. They need a fair opportunity to compete for the top jobs in the field along with everyone else. And that requires both adapting more characters of color and diversifying traditionally white or male characters. Because fair opportunities for actors who really exist matter more than fidelity to fictional characters who don't.


But I think the most satisfying solution to this problem is to make a Static Shock movie, put Black Lightning in a film etc., get these heroes on the screen already. No one wants black Peter Parker, they want Miles Morales. We're actually getting Mr Terrific soon, as a major character in the most important DC movie, looking absolutely comic-perfect. I'm interested in seeing who they bring in next.

I'd have no issue with a nonwhite Peter Parker. These days, demographic shifts make it more probable for a teenager from Forest Hills, Queens to be nonwhite than it was in the 1960s. And Peter's always been defined as a social outsider, so making him a minority would fit perfectly.


Comics have tried to diversify their casts in recent years, so we have a Black Batman right now. It's not Bruce Wayne. It's Jace Fox. A way to address this in the Gunnverse is to have Bruce Wayne appear in movies that are not exclusively Batman movies, like "Brave and the Bold" or The Outsiders or Justice League.

There's nothing new about comics trying to improve diversity. Stan Lee introduced the Black Panther and the Falcon back in the '60s when Black heroes in comics were unheard of. In the '70s, the X-Men and the Teen Titans introduced new, more diverse casts. And so on. They would've done much more if the culture at the time hadn't been so resistant.

And again, I for one would never have had a problem with Batman being Black. Back in the '90s, my fan casting preference for a hypothetical Batman TV series was Michael Dorn.
 
Schrager's review posting early would have been an editorial or publishing error. I've seen a lot of trouble caused by rolling out the wrong pages during site content updates. TDB yanked it real fast.
 
The so-called "Snyder cult" has a serious vendetta against this movie...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Move on people, it's over.
 
The so-called "Snyder cult" has a serious vendetta against this movie...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Move on people, it's over.
Yep.

Some of those goobers actually believe that if this movie underpefrorms Warners will call Snyder.

In other news, Kathleen Kennedy and Alex Kurtzman are both about to be fired. ;]
 
Wow, they went all in! Not a direction I expected. Kudos to them.
Okay, but this is a fan-made...

I saw this opener when I was 12 years old and that is what inspired the passion to pursue motion graphics, now fast forward to this year and after so many trials and errors, I built this effect using compositing tricks in Adobe After Effects by doing different comps using 3d extrusion by changing text to shapes and so forth, a lot of techniques were used, while this effect is easy to do, it takes time to set it up, and as for the nebula and galaxy elements, they're from Envato Elements to composite with the sequence. Inspired by both Superman the Movie and Superman Returns, this is a tribute by mixing retro with modern.


all credits go to John Williams for composing the theme and John Ottman for arrangement of the theme...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top