Neither confirm nor deny doesn't mean "doesn't exist."
In Abrams and Kurtman's hands, Section 31 became a lockpick to disregard much of the concepts and lore of the franchise.The current era of writers for the franchise just don't understand Section 31, which is why they have failed so badly using them. Section 31 should not be used in the current era again.
Bashir wasn't a dullard teenager. he was an augment with an extensive education. he would have known.ST: DIS takes place between 2258-2256 for the portion we care about
ST: DS9 takes place between 2369-2375
That's a 113 year time span.
IRL, we have kids who are teenagers right now who know "NOTHING" about 9/11 and that's a farely recent event in modern history.
Many people aren't students of history or don't really care.
This is on top of many pieces of info are purely digitized and easily edit-able.
That presents many issues moving foreward for data preservation.
Not to mention the eventual issue with Time Travel & Timeline Changes that will affect history.
But that's a whole other can of worms.
Yeah, that's why a officer like Boimler would know about them.
The much smaller variant that Bashir encountered would be closer to a "Urban Legend" than fact.
There's no way to prove it for a average citizen or StarFleet Officer.
Short of actually encountering them, everything becomes a "Urban Myth".
That's what Section 31 in the modern day UFP of the 24th century and beyond would become.
A "Rumor, Whisper, Myth, Legend".
That shows you how well data manipulation and hiding of info is during the 24th century.Bashir wasn't a dullard teenager. he was an augment with an extensive education. he would have known.
no. it was just bad writing.That shows you how well data manipulation and hiding of info is during the 24th century.
If Bashir, a Genius Augment, didn't learn about it until Section 31 confronted him in person; imagine what the average UFP Citizen or StarFleet would know.
He's a doctor, not a historian.(On the other hand, Sisko seems to be better acquainted with history (e.g. of the Bell Riots) than Bashir).
He's a doctor, not a historian.![]()
Section 31 are quite different from the FBI, CIA, and NSA. The FBI is a law enforcement agency, solving crimes and referring the evidence to civilian prosecutors to take to court. The FBI's counterintelligence works against foreign spies operating inside the United States. The CIA collects intelligence from many sources, about things happening outside the United States. They have in the past conducting dirty tricks against foreign government, though not so much in the last 50 years or so, and always with the knowledge and approval of the civilian U.S. government. The NSA breaks foreign cyphers and prepares cyphers for U.S. secret operations that would be very difficult for any foreign power to break. Why are there three agencies when Section 31 seems to do all of those things? (Plus Department of Defense Intelligence and Intelligence Agencies of each of the armed services...) Balance of power between agencies with defined roles, not having one over-powerful agency able to do everything.I like the idea of Section 31. If the Federation is to exist as a major power in a galaxy with the Romulan Tal Shiar and the Cardassian Obsidian Order, it makes sense the Federation has its own intelligence agency separate from the police or the armed uniformed agency charged with defending the Federation from enemies both foreign and domestic.
What I don't like is the constant depiction this agency is corrupt, evil, or seemingly operating outside any governmental authority. This agency is no different than any US intelligence agency such as the FBI, CIA, or NSA.
It's also silly Section 31 is named after Section 31 of the Federation charter. Or, if that's what they want to call it, then it's silly that the agency is supposed to be ultra secret yet specified in the charter.
It's also ludicrous that an ultra secret intelligence agency is going to have its own visible Starfleet badge that looks different than any other Starfleet badge.
Next thing you'll tell me that Omega doesn't print MI6 agent numbers on their watchesThere should be no logos or anything that identifies someone as belonging to S31 in the field (or SFI, either, for that matter). Just simply nothing.
Period, full stop. The whole notion is just simply absurd on its face.
Anyone who's spent any time in the intelligence communities of any nation would know this simple rule. It's called "non-attribution".
Even on base. If they have uniforms, the opposition will learn what they look like and can put one of their agents in a uniform to evade detection.It happened, so we have to deal with that consequence as part of the lore.
I 100% agree. Once you're out in the field on assignment, you don't wear any identifying marks.
When you're at base, I can understand the need for ID's, uniforms, etc.
The one thing that the Section 31 movie did right was wear disguises / civilian clothing.
Now some of those disguises was really bad (Smiling Vulcan, WTF were they thinking).
Bad Writing or Not, it affects all of us since it's now part of "Established Canon" that Section 31 was a legal lawful Government Entity underneath StarFleet Intelligence.no. it was just bad writing.
I like Discovery but they made some poor choices in its execution. I suspect CBS was driving those choices, or the desire to please CBS, at least. CBS loves police procedurals and dark government conspiracy stuff, and didn't have a clue what to do with Star Trek. When someone told them Star Trek had a spy agency, they went apeshit and ran with it. You can see the same thing with every season of Picard being riddled with conspiracies. It's all they know. They've somehow managed to avoid it for the most part with SNW, but we'll see.
It's so difficult to retcon what they did its better to just not bother and accept it as one of those giant green space hand things that doesn't make sense but you have roll with it. You won't agree because you have a tome you've written that works it all out, etc, and that's great, but I for me it doesn't work, and it doesn't stop me enjoying Star Trek. but I could have enjoyed it more if it hadn't sucked as much.
Badges are also easier to destroy / hide than an entire StarShip.The Black Badges would be like Black Helicopters.
Some might claim to have seen them, but they’re largely dismissed as paranoia.
Is this the reason why StarFleet constantly changes uniforms?Even on base. If they have uniforms, the opposition will learn what they look like and can put one of their agents in a uniform to evade detection.
it's remarkable how non-affected I am .Bad Writing or Not, it affects all of us since it's now part of "Established Canon" that Section 31 was a legal lawful Government Entity underneath StarFleet Intelligence.
I've said it before, but I would absolute watch a serious spy show about Starfleet Intelligence officers hunting down and arresting Section 31 operatives before they can carry out one of their plans. You could have actual spy work, gun fights, spaceship chases, a mole in the team they have to flush out, proper moral ambiguity. Make it the closest thing to Star Trek: Andor (except the folks in the intelligence organisation are the good guys and the other guys doing assassinations are the bad guys).Their existence has just gone "Under Ground" and they operate closer to a hidden Secret Society/Organization and operate like a distributed Terrorist Cell with independent sub units that don't know other members.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.