I'll cop to having sold a Dixon Hill/Durango crossover story to STAR TREK EXPLORER magazine not too long ago.A Fistful of Datas is a personal favourite.
And, yes, this was the result of a holodeck malfunction.

I'll cop to having sold a Dixon Hill/Durango crossover story to STAR TREK EXPLORER magazine not too long ago.A Fistful of Datas is a personal favourite.
Now??? ... Ummm... TAS which is part of the TOS Era, had a holodeck episode.
One could speculate that it was because of it, that Roddenberry added it to TNG.
As long as it doesn't involve the dangerous Holodeck malfunction trope I'm fine with such an episode on SNW.
It was a holo projector? But anyway the holodeck was clearly a brand new invention in tng. Unless spock is experimenting with one or trying with an alien version there is no reason to believe that the 1701 had one. Only other thing I can think of is starfleet scientists were developing a holodeck on earth and spock is getting to test it out. Maybe it took 100 years to perfect the technology. Who knows.
But that was just laser tag. IIRC, there was nothing to indicate that those holograms were solid or interactive.Also, and I’m not sure if anyone has pointed that out yet, but they showed something that very much resembled a holodeck way back in season one of Discovery, when Lorca and Tyler were running that tactical Klingon program. I know, I know, I’ve been trying to forget it as well.![]()
I thought it was well done.Also, and I’m not sure if anyone has pointed that out yet, but they showed something that very much resembled a holodeck way back in season one of Discovery, when Lorca and Tyler were running that tactical Klingon program. I know, I know, I’ve been trying to forget it as well.![]()
You’re right, one could argue it was a rudimentary version of what we then saw on TNG. Although, IIRC, it also already featured that aspect of it being able to realistically portray a much larger space in a small-ish chamber, possibly with the users on a sort of treadmill.But that was just laser tag. IIRC, there was nothing to indicate that those holograms were solid or interactive.
We don't see any interactive characters in the trailer, it actually looks like everyone involved is a member of the crew, but of course we won't know until we see the whole thing.A malfunction would show why it's not deployed widely for several more decades.
I suspect it will be something like that, like how Trip got to use an Alien holodeck in ENT. And the Holodeck wasn't actually new in TNG, just impressively more realistic than Riker had seen before. Janeway played a Flotter program as a child.
All SNW needs to do is have this be a prototype holodeck on a Starbase, and there shouldn't be interactive characters yet.
Well, there’s at least one character that has not been recognized as being one of the crew: That woman standing next to the sitting Pike in the shot with Kirk in front. I theorized elsewhere that it might be Batel in a wig. But it could also very well be a holodeck character.We don't see any interactive characters in the trailer, it actually looks like everyone involved is a member of the crew, but of course we won't know until we see the whole thing.
A malfunction would show why it's not deployed widely for several more decades.
I suspect it will be something like that, like how Trip got to use an Alien holodeck in ENT. And the Holodeck wasn't actually new in TNG, just impressively more realistic than Riker had seen before. Janeway played a Flotter program as a child.
All SNW needs to do is have this be a prototype holodeck on a Starbase, and there shouldn't be interactive characters yet.
I don't know if it was that clearIt was a holo projector? But anyway the holodeck was clearly a brand new invention in tng. Unless spock is experimenting with one or trying with an alien version there is no reason to believe that the 1701 had one. Only other thing I can think of is starfleet scientists were developing a holodeck on earth and spock is getting to test it out. Maybe it took 100 years to perfect the technology. Who knows.
I thought that was Una in a wig, but it's hard to see.Well, there’s at least one character that has not been recognized as being one of the crew: That woman standing next to the sitting Pike in the shot with Kirk in front. I theorized elsewhere that it might be Batel in a wig. But it could also very well be a holodeck character.
Plus, although we don’t get to see them, there seems to be a murder victim as well. Could be Spock playing dead (since we don’t see him in costume, I think) or indeed a virtual character.
Who isn't in a wig?I thought that was Una in a wig, but it's hard to see.
Kirk isn't! His outfit is fun though, reminds me of TMP Shatner.Who isn't in a wig?![]()
You know, you could be right. It really is hard to tell.I thought that was Una in a wig, but it's hard to see.
The Wig Party.Who isn't in a wig?![]()
That's been a glaring inconsistency throughout the entire franchise. Yes, everyone acts like the holodecks are new in TNG S1, but then we have the Voyager characters talking about using a holodeck in their childhoods. And then the characters on Lower Decks act like they're new again. Besides, we already saw a holodeck on Disco when they were still in the 23rd century.But anyway the holodeck was clearly a brand new invention in tng.
Boy, did you come to the wrong party.And finally there's like no context here at all. Yes, we see what appears to be a TNG era holodeck grid, but for all we know this could be a time-wimey episode. Maybe the Enterprise somehow ends up in the 24th century? Maybe a 24th century ship has ended up in the 23rd century? Maybe we should wait until the episode airs before we cry Canon Violation and sharpen our knives
You see, it's like this. In the past there was consistency to the inconsistency. Sure we had bad continuity and outright errors, but they were done in a consistent manner, thus preserving the franchise's integrity. Now we just have inconsistency, courtesy of a guy with a manbun who eats kale very hedonically and is thus making Star Trek so dead, even the maggots have moved on.Never mind all the other inconsistencies in Star Trek s history. Those are just signs that the writers loved the franchise, unlike these other inconsistencies which show utter contempt for Star Trek.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.