What's a Calypso?...
Well no, not for me. But this episode really demonstrated to me something that the series really needed: someone who challenged Burnham's values and actions constantly on an individual level, and forced Burnham to defend her convictions and show why her way of doing things is right. Raynor didn't buy Burham's management style on the bridge, but through the course of his adventure with Burnham he came to see the merits of how she operates, even if maybe he isn't 100% convinced. I think having a character like him right from the start would have done a lot to tone down the perception that Burhham acts unilaterally and the narrative contorts to support her actions.It took this episode t realize this?
Chief Lt. Crewman O'Brien.Chief O'Brien's rank would be confusing in any century of uniform design.
Maybe.Well no, not for me. But this episode really demonstrated to me something that the series really needed: someone who challenged Burnham's values and actions constantly on an individual level, and forced Burnham to defend her convictions and show why her way of doing things is right. Raynor didn't buy Burham's management style on the bridge, but through the course of his adventure with Burnham he came to see the merits of how she operates, even if maybe he isn't 100% convinced. I think having a character like him right from the start would have done a lot to tone down the perception that Burhham acts unilaterally and the narrative contorts to support her actions.
"The Captain's word is God" has always been the silent mantra of Star Trek, but Burnham didn't start out as a captain, and so her actions always being justified "just because" seemed to rub people the wrong way.Maybe.
I doubt it, because I can find examples of Burnham style decision making with various other captains who are proven right, and yet don't have to defend themselves for their decisions.
If it's not too far in the future from DSC S1, and if they do more than one S31 movie.......Yes, I miss Lorca as well. I think not finding a way to bring him back was a HUGE missed opportunity for Disco. The question of what happened to Prime Lorca is this dangling loose thread that will never be resolved unless they bring him onto Strange New Worlds.
™Rube Goldberg. He might also have the rights to the turbolift funhouse.The engineers of the time bugs must have been hardcore fans of Wile E. Coyote.
I just don't feel like Burnham was always right either. I think, like the tearfulness, it has been overblown over the last 5 seasons. But, then, I don't have a problem with tears or emotions, and I found Picard's decisions of being "always right" to be more aggravating than Burnhams, so what do I know?"The Captain's word is God" has always been the silent mantra of Star Trek, but Burnham didn't start out as a captain, and so her actions always being justified "just because" seemed to rub people the wrong way.
The problem isn't Burnham being right, it's the universe bending over backwards to make her right."The Captain's word is God" has always been the silent mantra of Star Trek, but Burnham didn't start out as a captain, and so her actions always being justified "just because" seemed to rub people the wrong way.
I just don't feel like Burnham was always right either. I think, like the tearfulness, it has been overblown over the last 5 seasons. But, then, I don't have a problem with tears or emotions, and I found Picard's decisions of being "always right" to be more aggravating than Burnhams, so what do I know?![]()
The problem isn't Burnham being right, it's the universe bending over backwards to make her right.
Take the second episode of this season, we had a magic rock avalanche from a relatively small mountain accelerate to the maximum front velocity of a snow based avalanche in seconds and then travel dozens of miles across flat terrain that had a number of rocky breaks in it to wipe out a town.
Same. There are so many other decisions by captains that I question so hard, but probably Picard gets it the worst (because I actually engage with some his stories more). But, Riker having the powers of the Q and not saving a little girl and the plot basically saying, "Yup, Picard was absolutely right by telling Riker to not use the powers." It comes across so painfully forced that I didn't watch it for a while afterwards.I mean Star Trek wouldn't be much of a science-fiction/fantasy show if the protagonists didn't have a least a higher-than-average success rate than most humans during crises, so I give them a lot of leeway.
Yeah and their initial smugness about the girl's death is pretty grotesque. Like they're glad they got some bragging points over the galaxy's most powerful concern troll. That was more important than the dead girl.Same. There are so many other decisions by captains that I question so hard, but probably Picard gets it the worst (because I actually engage with some his stories more). But, Riker having the powers of the Q and not saving a little girl and the plot basically saying, "Yup, Picard was absolutely right by telling Riker to not use the powers." It comes across so painfully forced that I didn't watch it for a while afterwards.
That's the one that stands out to me the most when its' said "Oh, the plot is forcing them to be right."
Yeah, and that's bad or different how?
Chief Lt. Crewman O'Brien.
The Previously On recaps on SNW have shown footage from Disco episodes already.ANSON MOUNT: "Previously on Star Trek: Discovery..."
It's a reference to Calypso. Zora tells Craft that it's Taco Tuesday, he asks "what's that?" Zora explains what a taco is, Craft then asks "and what's a Tuesday?"I don’t get that reference.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.