Khan’s rule on Earth took place before the timelines diverged.
Chekov being closer in age to Kirk (and the rest) might suggest Nero's incursion affected the timeline in both directions
Khan’s rule on Earth took place before the timelines diverged.
Chekov being closer in age to Kirk (and the rest) might suggest Nero's incursion affected the timeline in both directions
For whatever it's worth, it's in the 2016 Star Trek Encyclopedia.Logically speaking, I don't see how that could be possible. How could a temporal incursion affect the timeline before that incursion occurred? The logic just doesn't hold up.
Chekov being closer in age to Kirk (and the rest) might suggest Nero's incursion affected the timeline in both directions
Sorry, the context was no consequences for time travel because of the "get out of jail free" card of saving Earth.
Leeway but not carte blanche, in my opinion.Besides all that... his actions did save Earth, the lives of billions of people, and brought back a species from extinction. I think that deserves a bit of leeway.
Leeway but not carte blanche, in my opinion.
But, I'm a bit unreasonable on rule following sometimes.
Chekov wasn't born until eight years after the Narada even in that timeline. He was born in 2245 in the Prime Timeline. It's still a one-way alteration going forward from 2233.
With the Kelvin timeline, we are not entirely beholden to existing canon, this is an alternate reality and, as such is full of new and alternate possibilities. “BUT WAIT!” I hear you brilliant and beautiful super Trekkies cry, “Canon tells us, Hikaru Sulu was born before the Kelvin incident, so how could his fundamental humanity be altered? Well, the explanation comes down to something very Star Treky; theoretical, quantum physics and the less than simple fact that time is not linear.
Sure, we experience time as a contiguous series of cascading events but perception and reality aren’t always the same thing. Spock’s incursion from the Prime Universe created a multidimensional reality shift. The rift in space/time created an entirely new reality in all directions, top to bottom, from the Big Bang to the end of everything. As such this reality was, is and always will be subtly different from the Prime Universe. I don’t believe for one second that Gene Roddenberry wouldn’t have loved the idea of an alternate reality (Mirror, Mirror anyone?).
This means, and this is absolutely key, the Kelvin universe can evolve and change in ways that don’t necessarily have to follow the Prime Universe at any point in history, before or after the events of Star Trek ‘09, it can mutate and subvert, it is a playground for the new and the progressive and I know in my heart, that Gene Roddenberry would be proud of us for keeping his ideals alive. Infinite diversity in infinite combinations, this was his dream, that is our dream, it should be everybody’s.
He co-wrote Star Trek Beyond.And it’s relevant what Simon Pegg says…why, exactly?
His sole function is to play Scotty. He’s not writing any of the films. Therefore, his theories are not canon, and mean nothing.
He co-wrote Star Trek Beyond.
I actually head canon this. The Kelvin timeline does not have to line up with the Prime one in any way, shape, or form. Completely different, top to bottom.In addition, Simon Pegg postulated the timeline was altered in both directions.
The Kelvin timeline does not have to line up with the Prime one in any way, shape, or form.
In my mind, there are some things that happened at the same time or the same way in both universes. For instance, I think that McCoy's marriage broke up at around the same time in both universes. (But it doesn't necessarily follow that he met Jim Kirk immediately after.) But if it doesn't contradict anything in a big way, why not?I actually head canon this. The Kelvin timeline does not have to line up with the Prime one in any way, shape, or form. Completely different, top to bottom.
It's not, save for idle speculation.And it’s relevant what Simon Pegg says…why, exactly?
His sole function is to play Scotty. He’s not writing any of the films. Therefore, his theories are not canon, and thus mean nothing.
I'm curious as to why that wouldn't apply to all of the timelines where incursions/divergences have occurred?In addition, Simon Pegg postulated the timeline was altered in both directions.
And if you go with the idea that ripples go both ways, then wouldn't that mean there really is no continuity, since we have no idea what other changes have happened.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.