"Narrative?" You did a thing and it pissed me off because it was disrespectful of someone's grief. That's not a narrative, that's just what happens when you objectify women and disrespect someone's grief.
I wasn't even talking about her personal life, you brought it up.
There was no objectification, it was stating a fact that her hair style in-show, wasn't nearly as good as what she wears IRL.
No, you did that when you chose to respond to an interview about her grief by complaining about her hair.
I never brought up the interview, I was just talking about how her hair looks good.
The interview wasn't even on my mind, I never even wanted to discuss the interview.
You did, you're the one who cares about said interview and dragged it into the conversation, not me.
The only person having a hissy fit is the guy trying to play the victim and make himself a martyr because someone else called him out on his shitty behavior.
I'm not the one blowing up one picture into a argument.
What shitty behavior is there?
Stating that her hair IRL looks better than the style they gave her in show?
That's just my opinion on her hair style.
My mother died two years ago. Navia has spoken thoughtfully and sensitively about her grief many times; it's something I really connect to. And then you respond to this by complaining you don't think she's pretty enough.
I'm sorry for your loss, I lost my grand mother 6 years ago and grand father 7 years ago.
But that's not what we should be discussing at hand in this topic thread about "Is SNW getting too goofy?".
This was the first time I even heard about her personal tragedy, it sucks, my condolences.
But that was never the topic or subject matter at hand.
I'm not white-knighting. I'm offended because I know what it's like to grieve, and yet you responded to that topic by pissing all over it. I'm reacting this way because this disrespecting one person's grief is disrespecting every person's grief.
Everybody experiences loss, I have, you have, we all have at some point in time.
Doesn't mean we're dis-respecting it.
You became overly sensitive to a picture I screen capped.
I didn't even know she lost anybody until I watched the interview after you brought it up.
You cannot use an interview in that context and then change the topic to piss on her hair. The fact that that interview is about grief completely overrides everything else.
It was a screen cap that I grabbed randomly, I didn't even watch the interview until after you mentioned it.
The appropriate way for you to respond would be to say, "Hey, you know what, I'm sorry. I was trying to talk about this one thing, and I shouldn't have used an image from this particular interview to illustrate it. Doing that made it seem like I didn't care about her feelings or like I was disrespecting grief; that wasn't my intention and I apologize."
I'm sorry you were offended, that was never my intention.
I just grabbed a screen cap randomly because it was the first thing I saw and had easy access to.
Your feelings weren't even on my radar.
But instead, you chose to double-down on your alleged "right" to objectify a woman.
What, saying her IRL hair style is better than the one she wore in show?
Stop trying to control women's bodies.
Nobody here is controlling anybody's bodies.
I'm just stating the obvious fact that is how Hollywood operates and how they do business.
Good Looks sells, that's a fact of life.
People buy Hollywoods products because of good looks.
You don't have to like it, but that's reality.
