So what are your controversial Star Trek opinions then?
1. Looking forward to
Legacy.
2. Looking forward to the
Section 31 TV Movie.
3. When Disco left the 23rd Century, in a way, so did I.
4. I side with Janeway in "Tuvix".
5. PIC Season 3 is awesome.
6. As much as I like Spock, B'Elanna Torres is a much better example of someone coming to terms with two cultures.
7. "Calypso" needs a lead-in and a follow-up.
8. TOS Season 3 is good.
9. I felt it when Airiam died.
10. "The Omega Glory" is a good episode if you forget about the last part.
Bonus:
11. Speaking of Omega... An Omega Particle should've caused The Burn.
12. A later series can channel TOS all it wants, but that doesn't automatically mean it's always a good idea or that it'll work for said later series.
13. The phrase "Closer to TOS!" needs to be retired, because it doesn't actually mean anything, even though it
sounds like it does.
- TNG was "closer to TOS!" by going back to the exploration the movies had abandoned.
- DS9 was "closer to TOS!" by re-introducing serious character conflict between the main characters and by being out on the frontier.
- VOY was "closer to TOS!" with Voyager being all alone with no backup.
- ENT was "closer to TOS!" by taking place when everything was largely unexplored. And by duplicating the Kirk/Spock/McCoy trio.
- DSC was "closer to TOS!" by taking place closer to TOS than anything else up to that point and bringing back TOS characters.
- PIC was "closer to TOS!" by having the TNG characters be less stoic and having the TNG Era not look sterile.
- SNW is "closer to TOS!" by showing Pike's crew, going back to episodic stories, not being dark, and loving primary colors.
Notice a pattern? Every series is
supposedly "closer to TOS!" But how many of them actually are? Or is it really that there are different parts of TOS in each of the later series? And whatever part someone identifies as the most like TOS will determine which of those later shows is "closer to TOS!"