What if Worf learned that his father *had* betrayed the Klingons to the Romulans?
What if Worf learned that his father *had* betrayed the Klingons to the Romulans?
I noticed the other day that all the TNG season finales technically have no first part, in the name title I mean. It's "The Best of Both Worlds" but there's no Part I in the title, but there is a "The Best of Both World, Part II." And today I checked Enterprise and Voyager and it's only "Basics" that has a Part I and Part II.
Also was thinking today about if TNG did a "Wizard of Oz" homage, I guess Data could be Tinman, you could have some fun in having Worf as Cowardly Lion, but who would the other players be.
Ah, that explains "Basics" being the outlier then. I don't think it would change much for the show if it both parts aired in season 2 but I feel it did start them mostly doing two parters for their season finale/openers, so maybe that could have changed. It's made me have a rethink to how "The Best of Both Worlds" would have appeared to the TV audience watching it since for all they knew it was just a normal episode ending the season.TNG's "Unification" also had both parts containing "I" or "II" in their titles, but those were produced and aired in the middle of thecseason. (Well, early in season 5, but it wasn't a season finale or premiere.)
"BASICS" was also produced in the middle of season 2 (in this case, late in the season)... "SACRED GROUND", "FALSE PROFITS", "FLASHBACK", and "BASICS, PART II" were produced (in that order) after "BASICS, PART I". It was UPN that aired the first part as the season finale and the second part as the season 3 premiere.
"THE MAQUIS" and "PAST TENSE" two-parters both had "I" and "II" in their titles and were also produced in the middle of their seasons.
It looks like the producers wanted cliffhanging to be a surprise when it's a season finale, but for the middle of the season, they wanted the audience to be sure they come back for the second part, so they let us know by way of the title that 'this is a two week story, stick around for the second half'.
Ah, that explains "Basics" being the outlier then. I don't think it would change much for the show if it both parts aired in season 2 but I feel it did start them mostly doing two parters for their season finale/openers, so maybe that could have changed. It's made me have a rethink to how "The Best of Both Worlds" would have appeared to the TV audience watching it since for all they knew it was just a normal episode ending the season.
Also was thinking today about if TNG did a "Wizard of Oz" homage, I guess Data could be Tinman, you could have some fun in having Worf as Cowardly Lion, but who would the other players be.
I honestly wonder if it was invented purely for the joke of seeing them kiss in the present and wondering what-if, and then cutting to the future and it's already fallen apart.From "All Good Things..." how did, do you interpret the idea that a marriage between Picard and Crusher happened but didn't work out? Do you think the writers were really declaring that it wouldn't work out or just having both-ways fun with the idea, that it didn't work out in that future for some reason but (especially due to Picard seeing that possibility) it might have worked out in another?
I suspect he'd have killed himself... or just taken the death sentence. At the very least he'd never have gone back to his home world again.What if Worf learned that his father *had* betrayed the Klingons to the Romulans?
Well, you may be right. He does try on openmindedness from time to time, but I'm not so sure finding him was his only motive. For most of the time he was mainly intent on proving it was a lie, so he could kill that shady Yrridian lol. Plus, when he gets there, he's not all that accepting of it once he realized they were a Klingon/Romulan commune. Dude's got him a hard grudge against Romulans for this very reason, the murder of his family. He certainly causes a fair amount of havoc for them as it was. His dad being there could've made things just as possibly worse as better.I think he would have made his peace with it, in time. After all, he chose to find him in the first place.
I never understood the hate the character collected. For me, she was embarrassingly obvious and awkward - and I loved it.It's easy to see her as crass or obvious & maybe even a little pathetic when she does that, but the layers of it are actually pretty brilliant.
It was a kick in the teeth that Jean-Luc Crusher/Captain Beverly Picard wasn’t the state of the game in PIC.From "All Good Things..." how did, do you interpret the idea that a marriage between Picard and Crusher happened but didn't work out? Do you think the writers were really declaring that it wouldn't work out or just having both-ways fun with the idea, that it didn't work out in that future for some reason but (especially due to Picard seeing that possibility) it might have worked out in another?
I'll admit, when it aired, I didn't care for her. It was just too rude for me then. If Riker's dad had acted like that, it wouldn't have worked, but I was a teenager, & never really put together those layered nuances I mentioned above.I never understood the hate the character collected. For me, she was embarrassingly obvious and awkward - and I loved it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.