• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 3x10 - "The Last Generation"

Engage!


  • Total voters
    397
Of course. The whole season used a lot of exposition. What I am pointing out of something clunky in the writing. The writers wanted there to be tension between Seven and Shaw. How do they show it? Shaw dead names Seven. It sets up a narrative that is commonly seen, when people choose to leave behind old identities, but find those who won't accept them using their old name. This is a rather hamfisted way of creating tension, IMO. By choosing one narrative, they ignored one of equal importance: reclaiming old names that reflect the traditions of ancestors that have been stolen by enslavement, represented by the slave name. Imagine Burton on the whipping post, saying, "My name is Toby." In essence, one history of resistance is not being acknoledged in order to shoehorn the Seven-Shaw conflict into another. t's not that I somehow disapprove of people being called by the name they choose. It's the writers who didn't do their homework.
Given the tension this season was that Seven preferred being in the Rangers than in Starfleet at the beginning of the season, I assume she doesn't see herself as Annika. Most of her own memories as an individual are tied to being Seven, including her formative years on the Voyager, so I think it's fair that she'd choose Seven as the name that she wants.

Similarly, I assume it's why Hugh would choose to keep the name Hugh even though it's just something random that Geordi came up with.
 
I never said it had to do with genetics (and earlier, in this thread or elsewhere, I concurred with a lack of physical (thus genetic) change, in any large scale sense). Behaviour, however, is NOT simply genetics.
Of course we want to believe that our behaviour is not genetic; that truth is inconvenient.
 
Last edited:
Did you read the article? Behavioural modernity dates back to 50k years. Reading history also makes it clear that human behaviour has been the same for a long time. Of course we want to believe that our behaviour is not genetic; that truth is inconvenient.
I read the Wikipedia article. I’ve also read actual works on the subject. I’ve been an historian for 30+ years (off to teach class in about 30 minutes—it’s a long drive). I know how to “read history”. We are NOT merely biological automatons. Behaviour has a genetic COMPONENT, but it’s not an immutable destiny. Humanity has made deliberate choices, individually and collectively, that have altered its social and cultural perspectives, resulting in lasting changes that influence behaviours across time. That’s what “reading history” reveals. And, with that, as entertaining as this is, I choose to get ready for work. Unlike hunter-gatherers, I have to keep to a fixed schedule in order to keep my job. À la prochaine.
 
Was it *definitely* Janeway’s neurolytic virus that had left the Borg in the state that they were in during this weeks episode? Perhaps it was something else? Another Section 31 intervention against a Federation enemy, it could even be a result of a similar virus as to which Picard sent Hugh back to the Collective with? Another possibility; we know that the Artifact was functioning pretty much as normal up until it assimilated Ramdha and experienced the admonition, ultimately leading to its sub matrix collapse. Could the Admonition have spread throughout the Collective like a virus and have led to further collapse of unimatrixicies and sub matrix shutdown, leading to the remains of the Borg and their Queen as depicted in this weeks episode? Or did the Borg quite literally just cut the artifact off with no further contagion? There is no evidence that the virus inflicting the Borg is a result of Janeways virus, as this was not explicitly stated as it was in the case of the Changelings/Founders virus being caused by Section 31 - it was only ‘loosely’ insinuated with fans filling in the gaps and jumping to conclusions.
 
Was it *definitely* Janeway’s neurolytic virus that had left the Borg in the state that they were in during this weeks episode? Perhaps it was something else? Another Section 31 intervention against a Federation enemy, it could even be a result of a similar virus as to which Picard sent Hugh back to the Collective with? Another possibility; we know that the Artifact was functioning pretty much as normal up until it assimilated Ramdha and experienced the admonition, ultimately leading to its sub matrix collapse. Could the Admonition have spread throughout the Collective like a virus and have led to further collapse of unimatrixicies and sub matrix shutdown, leading to the remains of the Borg and their Queen as depicted in this weeks episode? Or did the Borg quite literally just cut the artifact off with no further contagion? There is no evidence that the virus inflicting the Borg is a result of Janeways virus, as this was not explicitly stated as it was in the case of the Changelings/Founders virus being caused by Section 31 - it was only ‘loosely’ insinuated with fans filling in the gaps and jumping to conclusions.

There was also a cube in Prodigy that was offlined explicitly due to Janeways virus.

But that was also reactivated
 
There was also a cube in Prodigy that was offlined explicitly due to Janeways virus.

But that was also reactivated
Exactly, once reactivated that cube seemed to behave pretty much like a normal cube too. After going to such great lengths to explain the Changeling virus, I wonder why they skirted around the bush with the Borg virus and it’s origins considering it was even more of a major plot point? :shrug:
 
Overall I enjoyed the last episode.
Why not let the crew go out in one last blaze of glory?
Renaming the Titan to The Enterprise-G was awful. Better to have named it the Picard ( he did die after all)
Promoting 7 to captain seemed forced, but good for her!
Worf. That is all I need to say. Zzzzzzzzz. Hilarious!

I was hoping the last lines would be:

Jack: Are the Borg really gone?
Q: We are the Q. Resistance is futile.
 
We are NOT merely biological automatons.
I never said we were. But the parameters of what our behaviour can be are definitely determined by genetics. Learned behaviour is constrained by these limitations.

EDIT: Let me put it another way. Gravity acts the same all the time, and yet the circumstances of how it acts on a particular objects can change the outcome. That doesn't mean that gravity has changed.

Humanity has made deliberate choices, individually and collectively, that have altered its social and cultural perspectives, resulting in lasting changes that influence behaviours across time.
I think you're confusing individual actions, and culture, with behaviour. Those aren't the same thing. Human behaviour has not changed during that time period. This doesn't mean that all humans act the same at all times.

If you read the article, you understand this, so I don't get why you continue to argue this point. All has been said, I think.
 
Renaming the Titan to The Enterprise-G was awful. Better to have named it the Picard ( he did die after all)
Promoting 7 to captain seemed forced, but good for her!

I wasn't a fan of renaming the Titan. Still not really. Terry's given his reasoning and I accept that. I think my preference would have been NOT to rename it at all. If they were renaming it and Seven was getting command then I'd have preferred renaming it to a Voyager variant.

Re Seven - I have no issue with her being promoted. I think my only disappointment around it was that it mean't that they weren't going to contrive a way for Shaw to live and continue on as Captain. I know Matalas has said that Todd Stashwick would be involved should they continue, but it obviously won't be as Captain so it'll be interesting to see how he'd factor in.
 
Renaming the Titan to The Enterprise-G was awful. Better to have named it the Picard ( he did die after all)

Have to admit that's what I thought they'd named it from what Jack said

I for one love the renaming. Just worried about them running out of letters -- the J isn't due for another 50-100 years, which leaves the H and I. We burnt through D,E,F and now G in 35 years.
 
It has just occurred to me how annoying it is that the modern writers think that something heavier than a cruise liner can perform hairpin turns just because it is in space.

I had similar beef with the NuEnterprise doing the same in an atmosphere.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top