• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 3x10 - "The Last Generation"

Engage!


  • Total voters
    397
Around 40,000 kilometers is the maximum range of transporters. A large chain of ships wouldn't get them out of the system, let alone to a distant world.

Not a bad idea, but there are nowhere near enough ships to do that.
That was the maximum range of Federation Transporters as of the TNG era.

We actually don't know the current range of Federation Transporters, though given they have had decades to study Dominion one's, a safe assumption would be "longer".
 
You say sterile/perfect, others might say progressive/enlightened.
TNG's first season is set in the year 2364, that's 340 years in our future.
If you managed to transport a group of people from the year 1684 (that's 340 years in our past) to the year 2024, surely they'd perceive us as highly advanced—as advanced to them as the TNG crew is to us.
Advanced, yes, but still able to relate to us, connect and find meaningful similarity in values and motivation. Again, the sterile feeling of the early TNG crew is that they lack human warmth.
 
That was the maximum range of Federation Transporters as of the TNG era.

We actually don't know the current range of Federation Transporters, though given they have had decades to study Dominion one's, a safe assumption would be "longer".

Fair point about the Dominion transporters. But as far as we've ever seen on screen (Eris and Kira, possibly Female Changeling in "HEART OF STONE"), that has only worked with a single person. Millions or billions is a whole different ballgame.
 
To be honest, most descriptions by fans about the wonders of enlightened 24th century humans with their "evolved sensibilities" and "stoicism" kind of come off as if they rather come from, to a degree, the modern, very Generation-X custom of swallowing your problems and negative emotions because they are personal matters, presentation matters, and it would be rude and selfish to "force them" upon the people around you. With a dash of the masculine expectation of being firm and strong all the time and to never show any weakness, or the requirement that women shoulder the responsibility of empathy and serving the emotional needs of their community before considering their own problems or goals, lest they be seen as unlikeable, cold-hearted careerists.
 
That excuses nothing. A big part of the season is accepting Seven and her real name. One would think that after watching, someone could excuse their own preferences and actually go along with the journey the character has made.

Some people just like being contrarian
 
I assure you the average human today isn't that different from one from the 17th century
Physically? Sure. Culturally, psychologically, sociologically? History, psychology, and sociology would like a word. As an historian, I highly recommend (but only if you have the time--it's a big book), David Lowenthal's The Past is a Different Country. The difference between the 17th and 21st centuries are not nearly as big as between the medieval world and today, but they are not insignificant.
 
Was it crewed by Cherokee people?

Well, then they became a Cherokee tribe!

No. Just with a lotta of people who claimed to be.

You can't just decide to "become" a Cherokee tribe. No one can (there's the matter of state/Federal recognition).

A tribe is a political entity bound by culture. A tribe is a community. There's a great deal of controversy within the tribes themselves over who gets to call themselves "Cherokee."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top