• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Discovery ending with Season 5

Who's the chief engineer - Stamets or Reno?
Neither. In season 1 a computer graphic does refer to Stamets as the chief engineer, though that episode's writer tweeted that was a mistake. Then in season 2 Reno even says she's been ordered by the chief engineer to assist Stamets. Since season 3, who knows? Reno does outrank Stamets, yet Stamets seems to be the go to guy for all engineering related matters, and even orders Reno around despite being lower rank than her. Even weirder, she obeys her orders, sometimes even without without her trademark snark.
I think Stamets' lab started out as just a science lab, but then the same location sorta morphed into engineering out of plot/production convenience/laziness,
Actually, no. Stamets's lab is stated to be the engine room in dialogue all the way back in Context is for Kings.
I don't think Disco's writers have ever been that concerned with the chain of command.
Fuller wanted to get away from the format of the main cast consist of the crew roster that went on in the other shows. Though either intent got lost after he left or it was a failed premise to begin with, the main cast ended up consisting of most senior staff positions anyway, just without a CMO or chief engineer. Though, really, even in the first season Culber fit the narrative parameters for the CMO anyway, being the medical authority in the show's cast and he was of appropriate rank to be the CMO. They really should have just made him the CMO anyway. And given how the an experimental propulsion drive is central to the show's story arc, it makes it very odd that a chief engineer has never been seen.

If anything, the Disco writers should have learned the lesson Ron Moore learned on BSG. At first, he was adamant not to include Galactica's doctor or engineer, to do so he felt was being too much like Star Trek. But quickly in the first season he learned they needed a doctor on the show in order to deal with President Roslin's cancer storyline. And while they managed to make it all the way to the final season before getting into an engineering related storyline, and without a pre-established character in that role they ended up treating Chief Tyrol as the ship's engineer, which everyone agreed made no sense, but there wasn't much else they could do at that point.
 
Remember Roddenberry had the idea that there was no chief engineer because the ships were so advanced that they didn’t need one. So we had all those different assistant engineers running around season 1. Then season 2 rolled around then LaForge was the Chief Engineer.
 
I have a new appreciation for Discovery now after watching with dismay the progress (or more accurately, lack of progress) in recent episodes of Picard that have stellar direction and dialogue but what I feel is a terrible and tired plot--won't say more since this obviously isn't Picard's forum.

Discovery tried to do something different. From going to a post-temporal war future with this entirely new stuff about 10-C, the Burn, and the spore drive, it really did what no other Trek did before. Even critics can't say this was "same old" Trek. Was it flawed? Yes, very much so. But it was the definition of risk taking, and with its cancelation it seems those risks failed.

I wasn't looking forward to Starfleet Academy, but suddenly I find it ironic that the most risk-taking and ground breaking Trek might be coming from that show after all.
 
I have a new appreciation for Discovery now after watching with dismay the progress (or more accurately, lack of progress) in recent episodes of Picard that have stellar direction and dialogue but what I feel is a terrible and tired plot--won't say more since this obviously isn't Picard's forum.

I don't know what is going to happen with the ending of "Discovery". But I hope for its sake that it has a better ending than "Picard".
 
There’s a difference between making assumptions and acting like you have inside information. But honestly I don’t care all that much. And as I mentioned in another thread, I haven’t been this unenthusiastic about a new Trek show since ENT.
And now another one. :beer: congrats Trekkies.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top