... Patrick Stewart.
Before anyone starts writing angry comments, let's stipulate that Stewart is an amazing, legendary actor, and the character of Picard and
Star Trek wouldn't be what it is today without his contribution towards it. But IGN has an interesting video which argues the big problem with the direction of
Star Trek: Picard in its first two seasons was Stewart's instincts about where the story of the Picard character and the bigger universe should evolve.
Reportedly, Stewart basically had 3 conditions for doing
Star Trek: Picard.
- No uniforms
- No Enterprise
- Not a TNG reunion
If you now look at season 3, it basically throws all of those conditions out the window, while also reversing everything season 1 intended to do. They didn't want the show to be a TNG reunion. Its become a TNG reunion. When you couple that with season 3 reversing the death of Data in season 1, gets rid of most of the characters from season 1, and had Riker and Troi making fun of their circumstances in season 1, it sorta seems like the powers that be, as well as Stewart, know how a huge chunk of the audience reacted to the first two seasons and are purposely going the other way.
Also, when it comes to Stewart's instincts for Picard, I do remember reading around the time of the
TNG movies there were stories that Stewart pushed for the movies to feature a version of Picard that was more an action hero, instead of the cerebral speech-maker from the TV series. He wanted Picard to be the one that was in the middle of fights, carrying a phaser, and the driver of the action within the stories. That's why
Generations, First Contact,
Insurrection, and
Nemesis all feature "final fights" where Stewart is face-to-face with the villains, or Picard driving a Starfleet dune buggy in the desert, or Picard having the love story with the Baku woman. And there's an argument to be had for sure of whether or not that worked or was a good choice.