We can see the scale of the TOS Enterprise on a display screen in "The Enterprise Incident":
This exactly agrees with a length of 289m/947ft.
Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 3x09 - "Võx"
- Thread starter Commander Richard
- Start date
We can see the scale of the TOS Enterprise on a display screen in "The Enterprise Incident":
This exactly agrees with a length of 289m/947ft.
The Cerritos was designed to be ugly.
Not legible in the actual episode.
Well, I mean... I can read it
Either way, the production team had a very specific size in mind, confirmed this many times, and this graphic which did appear on screen agrees with it.
I know, but does it have to be ugly AND designed to be a hazard in an emergency? Or even just dumbly inefficient? Imagine all the lost time and wasted human resource with turbolift rides three times as long as they need to be.
If you use the scale on the top right, the enterprise comes up shorter than 289 meters. So it actually doesn't match the commonly accepted lengeth.Well, I mean... I can read it
Either way, the production team had a very specific size in mind, confirmed this many times, and this graphic which did appear on screen agrees with it.
You should have seen some of the Cerritos concept art. What we got was positively pedestrian compared to some of them.
Touché!
Did you want any of her review videos? She's been very positive about the season so far.
She's been generally more positive than TrekYards.
There was a lot of 'for fucks sakes' in TrekYard's review today. Nitpicking galor. One of them hates that they're taking the Enterprise-D because it's outdated technology.
Within an acceptable margin of error given fat lines and low resolutions it looks like pretty much 950ish feet to me:
1ft = 0.3048m, therefore 950ish feet is somewhere around 290m
No I haven't watched any tubers videos.. At all.
Most if them are random people like on here.. Blah.
Let's not drag up Tos sizes in ANOTHER thread.. Quantum torpedoed to death
Most if them are random people like on here.. Blah.
Let's not drag up Tos sizes in ANOTHER thread.. Quantum torpedoed to death
Nearly everyone has been positive about this season in the review space.
However within that video, that person has some concern that Picard S3 takes a very 'Berman' approach to Trek socio-politically... which is accurate.
They'll get the opposite of that with Discovery S5 and the Academy spinoff. So I can't really take that rant too seriously.
About a month ago, I had someone I knew from high school contact me via Facebook to tell me that she was cleaning out her parents house and found a box of computer printouts that I had given her listing every Beatles recording session along with plot summaries of every 'Blake's 7' episode. She'd lost or thrown away the mixtapes I'd given her. She mailed them back to me and, seeing this was back in '89, that was a lot of legwork/research involved.
So you want worf to still be dealing with Daxs death 22 years later?
I can see them saying these exact lines. That's how dead-on this is.
It's interesting that's the takeaway, especially given that in interviews Gates McFadden has been gushing about how she'd work for Terry Matalas again in a second because of how well she feels the Crusher character is fleshed out here.
From Variety:
VARIETY: Terry’s made no secret that he would love to continue this storyline on a new show that he wants to call “Star Trek: Legacy.” Would you want to continue playing Crusher?
GATES MCFADDEN: If she was as three dimensional as she was really becoming in this one? Absolutely. And, as I said, I trust Terry. I’ll play a Klingon for Terry. I mean, he’s really a wonderful, wonderful producer and writer, storyteller. And I love good storytellers. I built a theater in L.A., and we did only new work. I think people who can tell a story, I’ll be the first one to jump on board to help out. I hope it does. I think he would do a tremendous job. And I would love to be involved in some way.
GATES MCFADDEN: If she was as three dimensional as she was really becoming in this one? Absolutely. And, as I said, I trust Terry. I’ll play a Klingon for Terry. I mean, he’s really a wonderful, wonderful producer and writer, storyteller. And I love good storytellers. I built a theater in L.A., and we did only new work. I think people who can tell a story, I’ll be the first one to jump on board to help out. I hope it does. I think he would do a tremendous job. And I would love to be involved in some way.
Actually it is legible. On the HD CDs you can clearly see the scale. Better if you have a zoom feature on your DVD player. So it's canon. Really nice drawings.
And this whole stealing the D from the museum was in the draft for AGT
They have at least 2 from S1
The only way I can read such threads is by skipping posts (like when too long, seem off topic, repeat things...)When I logged off last night the thread was at page 16. When I logged on this morning it was at page 50.By the time I left for work I'd reached page 50 but the thread was at page 67. I've not long reached the end and it's at page 78. Really glad I don't mod this forum.
On Bynaus
3 nacelles? Nope, sadly not
Imagine that: Your DRONE is mistaken. - Toaster! - Tubehead!! - ...I feel the equivalent would be if Data qipped back and called her "Drone."
They should have done that, it would have showcased the new Data.
The universe is not that badly designed.
It simply reminded me of this:
SEVEN: When your Captain first approached us, we suspected that an agreement with humans would prove impossible to maintain. You are erratic, conflicted, disorganised. Every decision is debated, every action questioned. Every individual entitled to their own small opinion. You lack harmony, cohesion, greatness. It will be your undoing.
It's a new and complete set
Yeah I rewatched Enterprise on my phone so maybe it just looked better on the phone . Lol
Matalas actually confirmed that they did indeed rebuilt the entire bridge themselves using the original blueprints.