• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 3x09 - "Võx"

Engage!


  • Total voters
    357
So, there's no reason someone isn't "allowed" to have any emotional reaction they wish to any of these fictional characters. If they want to be happy at good things happening to characters, great. If they want to celebrate bad things happening to them, I don't see how that's despicable.

With you. I was glad when Joffrey died in GoT and there's nothing wrong with that.
 
Yes! I always viewed it as here's this person who's on the same team but has a totally different perspective on how to accomplish what they wanted to and it was good to see the "conflict" play out. She wasn't really wrong about anything! But neither was Riker if you look at it from his perspective...
Reminds me of one of my favorite pics:
7a3YwAE.jpg
 
Using the MCU as an example again... They didn't really assemble the Avengers in Act 1 of the movie. They waited until the Battle of New York at the end to do the wrap around shot of them in costume as a team fully together. They used the TWO HOURS beforehand (as well as multiple movies) to expand on the characters, their differences, and what they have to overcome to bring them to the place of being a true team.

That's no different than what's happened here.

I think another way to look at this is that the E-D was the last character to be introduced. I know some posters here do not believe the ships to be characters but the E-D is the most heavily explored ship, inside and out (we've even been inside a nacelle tube!) we as fans got to experience. The E-D lent a certain terroir (for lack of a better term) to TNG and thus it's more than just a vehicle. Once we got on the E-D, only then was the full team back together.
 
Not an apt comparison since I'm not "mocking" someone's reaction to enjoying the death of a fictional character. Is it okay to celebrate Vadic's death?
I personally don't think so, but then I don't find it very enjoyable. Again, this strikes me as a fine line between having a reaction and the full on "YES! Suck it!" type reaction being presented. I just don't find suffering very celebratory.
I think another way to look at this is that the E-D was the last character to be introduced. I know some posters here do not believe the ships to be characters but the E-D is the most heavily explored ship, inside and out (we've even been inside a nacelle tube!) we as fans got to experience. The E-D lent a certain terroir (for lack of a better term) to TNG and thus it's more than just a vehicle. Once we got on the E-D, only then was the full team back together.
If it must be then do it sooner.

If the D must be treated as a character then bring them in sooner. It now feels like we've spent too much time spinning wheels to get to that big emotional moment and I for one am not warmed by it.
 
With you. I was glad when Joffrey died in GoT and there's nothing wrong with that.

Yep - I didn't see anyone complaining that people were "celebrating a death" then. Granted, Joffrey was roughly a million times more unlikeable than Shelby - to me. But I won't begrudge anyone the right to like or dislike any particular character without knowing their reasons.
 
Yep - I didn't see anyone complaining that people were "celebrating a death" then. Granted, Joffrey was roughly a million times more unlikeable than Shelby - to me. But I won't begrudge anyone the right to like or dislike any particular character without knowing their reasons.
Never watched it. So should I be partying like it's 1986 when I watch TWOK? Finally, Khan is fucking dead man!
 
Never watched it. So should I be partying like it's 1986 when I watch TWOK? Finally, Khan is fucking dead man!

"Should" you be? Of course not, you can have whatever reaction you want because these are fictional characters. That's what I'm arguing.
 
"Should" you be? Of course not, you can have whatever reaction you want because these are fictional characters. That's what I'm arguing.
Yes, and I find people's reactions uniquely telling in to their personality. That's what I'm arguing. And some aspects I find odd, to be polite.
 
Crimes of Joffrey Baratheon that earned him death: torturing animals, murder of Ned Stark and his entourage, ordering Sansa to be stripped naked and beaten publicly, ordering the assassination of all his half-siblings, ordering an assassination attempt on his uncle, forcing a prostitute to torture another to death at gunpoint, threatening to execute his own mother for daring to discipline him, and generally being a complete unrepentant psychopath.

Crimes of Elizabeth Shelby that earned her death: she was mean to Will Riker.
 
Now if people were celebrating Pulaski's death, that'd be different :lol:
Ships have been named after living people. The Jimmy Carter and the George HW Bush (which was commissioned while he was still alive) come to mind.

Maybe Pulaski became President of the Federation, because going by the sheer number of incurable diseases, the fact that 800 years after TNG they still can't cure Detmer's injury and remove her implant, and the fact that medical checks are so sloppy that irumodic syndrome can be misdiagnosed (this irritates me because Crusher outright said at the end of BOBW "The DNA is... returning to normal" and obviously she wasn't completely thorough on that), I don't think she magically improved the state of Federation medicine.
 
Crimes of Joffrey Baratheon that earned him death: torturing animals, murder of Ned Stark and his entourage, ordering Sansa to be stripped naked and beaten publicly, ordering the assassination of all his half-siblings, ordering an assassination attempt on his uncle, forcing a prostitute to torture another to death at gunpoint, threatening to execute his own mother for daring to discipline him, and generally being a complete unrepentant psychopath.

Crimes of Elizabeth Shelby that earned her death: she was mean to Will Riker.
Clearly a monster deserving of a fate worse than death.

Also, eternal scorn.

Like Shaw as he was mean to Picard.
 
Crimes of Joffrey Baratheon that earned him death: torturing animals, murder of Ned Stark and his entourage, ordering Sansa to be stripped naked and beaten publicly, ordering the assassination of all his half-siblings, ordering an assassination attempt on his uncle, forcing a prostitute to torture another to death at gunpoint, threatening to execute his own mother for daring to discipline him, and generally being a complete unrepentant psychopath.

Crimes of Elizabeth Shelby that earned her death: she was mean to Will Riker.

I *still* don’t know how that shit got popular.
 
My biggest problem with Shelby's appearance in this episode was her monologue. She delivered it well, as it did what it was designed to do, but it was shocking to see the once-ambitious Commander who wanted nothing more than to captain her own starship act like, well... a glad-handing politician. I get that it was "Frontier Day" and all that - clearly a special occasion that required her appearance at the head of the fleet - but I always saw her as being a FAR better officer and capable of so much more than smiling like a blank-eyed Disney animatronic and rattling off empty platitudes. I guess that's what being a "Fleet Admiral" means. Too much like real life, I guess.

And yes - I, too, was shocked to see her taken down so quickly. Someone said it up-thread, I think. PIC S3 does seem to have a cameo curse. Anyone coming out for a visit is almost certainly going to be vaporized or in some way disappeared by the end of the episode. What's the body count we have so far?
  • Ro Laren
  • Moriarty
  • Tuvok-who-wasn't-Tuvok
  • Shelby
  • Could Tasha's 5-second holo-thing be considered a cameo?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top