If you don't mind some unsolicited advice, just don't engage. Don't feed the troll. Everyone else seems to be ignoring them, and it seems to be working.
That was the last response I will give, you are correct.
If you don't mind some unsolicited advice, just don't engage. Don't feed the troll. Everyone else seems to be ignoring them, and it seems to be working.
That is not surprising at all. There is a real world precedent.Right but the ship has functional launchers? The phaser arrays have been repaired/replaced? The shields? And not just 'they work to do a demo to impress visitors', but combat-ready?
I don't care at all about the erstwhile subtext, but the last-second logic they injected to get all of - and only -- the original TNG cast onto the Ent-D bridge is my one major issue with this episode.
Prior episodes had Ro and the Changelings both avoiding use of the transporters, and then it turns out it wouldn't have affected them anyway because of the technobabble that allows Riker, Worf, et al to escape the consequences of the premise.
In the real life military, it is true like half of enlisted are under 25. But very few officers are, and those who went to Starfleet Academy are officers.
The bridge crew should be older, established folks, not n00bs on a ship like the Titan.
The show seems to intimate that the under-25 folks somehow took over every bridge but one in the entire fleet quickly...how? Like, really, are the officer corps entirely Gen Z now?
If the kids successfully decapitated all of the over-25 people, that means that Starfleet's entire officer corps has been decapitated, which will lead to pretty ridiculous outcomes for Star Trek: Legacy (or any other hypothetical post Picard show).
I agree with this entirely. In fact, I think much of what happened in Generations, including Kirk's death, had to happen to make the movie thematically work. And frankly, the Galaxy class was a perfect 4:3 aspect ratio design (really, even better for TV than the original 1701) but future movie TNG demanded a long nacelled, cinematic new Enterprise.It might not have been the best way to destroy her, but I think the Enterprise-D needed to be destroyed in Star Trek: Generations. That film was about mortality, and I think thematically the Enterprise-D needed to "die" to provide thematic closure to Picard grieving the loss of his brother and nephew.
Given the capabilities of the Galaxy class, which would still be substantial in 2401 barring a major technological advance, there is no reason that principle wouldn't apply to a ship as historic as the Enterprise D
Shelby died doing what she loved, failing to kill the Borg.
I wonder if it didn't become fully active until the Changelings were working on their plan?Doesn’t dialogue establish that the brain mutation is a bit ‘X-Gene’ and only kicks in at a certain age? And Jack says he’s always felt different, but he and Beverly say people have only been after him the last few months?
This plan would only have kicked in once they knew about Jack, or once he manifested his mutant abilities. Now Jack is Legion…
Shaw's death was my biggest problem of the episode. I can't quite articulate why, but it threw the pacing of that scene out of whack. It also wasn't necessary, as captain of the Titan he was never going to leave. It also leaves a bad taste in my mouth to spend so much time building up an interesting character only to kill him off so suddenly.
Doesn’t dialogue establish that the brain mutation is a bit ‘X-Gene’ and only kicks in at a certain age? And Jack says he’s always felt different, but he and Beverly say people have only been after him the last few months?
This plan would only have kicked in once they knew about Jack, or once he manifested his mutant abilities. Now Jack is Legion…
That's great to know. But it's not surprising. A lot of the 90s era TV houses I believe used Lightwave 3D while the movies used Maya and I believe Maya is still the standard. I could be getting that backwards. In any event, it caused problems moving them between production houses even then. And the 90s CG was of such low fidelity for modern purposes, that the Eaglemoss models could only use them as starting points for lines and sizing.One of the VFX artists on Picard said they have access to a lot of the 90s CG assets, but it's just a pain in the ass to upconvert to their modern rendering software formats, which is why they were using STO and Eaglemoss models.
Too much. They spent too much money on that sequence. It was pointless and didn't add anything. It was all because Jeri Taylor said they (Moore and Braga) needed a fun introduction to the crew in her script notes.
Realistically, they should be thousands of miles apart. Strangely enough, due to the limitations of the technology in the 60s, TOS probably had the most realistic space battles, everything since then has all of the combatants silly close.Maybe. The show doesn't really explain it. We saw some tight formations during the battles in DS9, what's the advantage to flying even closer together? In combat it would seem like a disadvantage because you make yourself a bigger target.
Functionally speaking, the only thing they loose out on by going into battle without a crew is damage control.
And even that's up in the air given they had damage control drones a hundred years ago, which is especially relevant here given Geordi directly mentioned using Drones to load the D's torpedo's.
They aren't taking the Enterprise-D out with the idea of long or even mid term sustainability in mind.I dunno man, that seems like a pretty big thing to only be relying on drones for!
OH snap - that is definitely long game thinking. That's an extinction level pandemic event issue.I just realized that since the borg DNA has been added to all the oldesters as well, that kind of implies that everyone who has been in a transporter will now pass that crap on to their children, much as Picard passed his own borg DNA on to Jack.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.