Tuvok left Starfleet for a time after his stint on Excelsior. We don't know that Saavik ever did.
Yep. Tuvok left Starfleet for 51 years between 2298 and 2349.
Dumb stuff with Lore: So Lore trying to take over the ship was the most predictable thing imaginable. There was no way Geordi would hook Lore up to a system connected to the ship. He'd definitely use an isolated system. Really took me out of the story. Just wouldn't happen.
If you're coming into the episode discussion thread looking to avoid spoilers before you've seen the episode and skipping posts that would have informed you that the episode has dropped, that's on you.
This is the episode discussion thread. If you're coming in before you've seen the episode, know the risks.
How can I know there's a risk of seeing a spoiler about an episode I don't know has dropped yet? .
In terms of the talky exposition, the only thing I found that really kind of..broke my trance, as it were, was Beverly *saying*.."I'm losing my compass".
You can *show* someone losing their moral compass, happened with Sisko in DS9 but it also took multiple episodes to show that progression, Picard doesn't have a 25 episode season, and multiple seasons like it, to do so.
Characters being lost: For the first half of the season, the show was excellent at juggling the various characters. Now some literally vanish from the Titan (Worf and Raffi). And even Seven and Shaw are barely there, fading into the background. Riker and Troi aren't shown but I'm actually ok with that because of their separate location.
You can *show* someone losing their moral compass, happened with Sisko in DS9 but it also took multiple episodes to show that progression, Picard doesn't have a 25 episode season, and multiple seasons like it, to do so.
Not really with Sisko? Have you seen "For the Uniform"? Sisko's obsession with Eddington, which leads to his crimes, comes out of nowhere and saw no repercussions. As for "In the Pale Moonlight", again, it doesn't connect with any development in prior episodes and doesn't have any follow on (except in Una McCormack's wonderful Hollow Men). In each, Sisko did bad, but it's never mentioned again. The same with "the Siege of AR-558". Overall there is the context of the conflicts (the Maquis, the Dominion War), but each episode is an island, without a sense of developmental characterisation between episodes.
It would be funny if this ended up being a Xanatos Gambit where they intended to lose as a distraction for Worf and Raffi to take the Shrike and rescue Will.
in fact that'd be awesome.It would be funny if this ended up being a Xanatos Gambit where they intended to lose as a distraction for Worf and Raffi to take the Shrike and rescue Will.
Agreed. That was my thought too. They set up how they'll need some elaborate plan to return to how things were. Ugh. That's probably the entirety of the 8th episode. Maybe we'll learn something new.I was mostly captivated by this episode, until the ending.
While acknowledging that we don't know what episode 8 will bring, I just sighed thinking to myself that now they're going to have to spend an episode extricating Riker/Troi and now the Titan from danger instead of moving onto the last Act.
It's not about episodic storytelling vs. serialization. It's about being 7/10ths of the way through the story and still not knowing who the real antagonist is, what they want, or why they're doing any of this. It's the equivalent of being 1 hour and 24 minutes into a 2-hour movie and still not really knowing what's going on.Because instead of a single story being at most a 2 parter season finale/opener..we now have more or less a single story for the entire season, so you have to time your payoffs.
I get it though, traditional Trek episodic formatting would have things moving a little faster..but this isn't normal Trek anymore.
And the little we do learn about Vadic's boss shows him to be cartoonishly evil who gets a kick out of torturing his henchmen. If he does end up being someone from Picard's past, it seems unlikely it was from one of the better episodes.It's not about episodic storytelling vs. serialization. It's about being 7/10ths of the way through the story and still not knowing who the real antagonist is, what they want, or why they're doing any of this. It's the equivalent of being 1 hour and 24 minutes into a 2-hour movie and still not really knowing what's going on.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.