• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Section 31 General Discussion Thread

A Section 31 series. Yay or nay?

  • Yay, a Section 31 series!

    Votes: 80 40.0%
  • Nay, give us anything else instead!

    Votes: 120 60.0%

  • Total voters
    200
Maybe, but Kurtzman isn't in the driver seat anymore, so we will see. My bet is still on Star Trek Titan being next.
Led by who? No one in the cast has the Star power to be a lead in such a series.

Michelle Yeoh OTOH (Who while doing press for Everything Everywhere All At Once) stated in multiple interviews she hoped she'd still get to do Star Trek Section 31 with Alex Kurtzman...
 
Weird he's still doing interviews and being paid as if he was in charge.

Who's the man behind the curtain?

Paramount has a deal with bad robot so Kurtman's name is still there, BUT they had him shift his focus to Clarence last year which likely helped give space to the more talented Akiva and Matalas to create better shows.

They just need a way to keep him distracted and away from any creative stuff on Star Trek.
 
I never said he was fired nor did the guyin the video, more distracted snd sidelined some how.
Excuse me. The Kurtzman is sidelined is an impressive level of cognitive dissonance presented in Trek conspiracy theories online.

I stand by my above statement. People are trying way too hard, investing way too much in coming up with rationalizations against a man who has no impact upon their day to day lives. People are literally wishing Kurtzman lose his job for making a poor piece of entertainment they don't agree with. They are finding ways to justify it through lack of evidence based hypotheses of Kurtzman's professional career. Devoting a lot of time to someone over a minor disagreement.

It's absurd to a number of degrees.
 
Excuse me. The Kurtzman is sidelined is an impressive level of cognitive dissonance presented in Trek conspiracy theories online.

I stand by my above statement. People are trying way too hard, investing way too much in coming up with rationalizations against a man who has no impact upon their day to day lives. People are literally wishing Kurtzman lose his job for making a poor piece of entertainment they don't agree with. They are finding ways to justify it through lack of evidence based hypotheses of Kurtzman's professional career. Devoting a lot of time to someone over a minor disagreement.

It's absurd to a number of degrees.

I never said I thought Kurtzman should lose his job, I just want him to take more of a back seat in terms of the creative end, especially when it comes to Star Trek Strange New Worlds and Star Trek Legacy. I think they will do that by giving him miniseries and TV movies to explore his more experimental side with, such as Section 31 & Star Fleet Academy and MAYBE if for once GFR is right, Star Trek: Dominion War.
 
A lot of youtube doofuses have mined a lot of clicks from screwball hate videos since Abrams did ST09. It's sad but inevitable. If these charlatans really cared about Trek, they'd dial down the histrionics, hatred, and invective and focus more on constructive criticism.

In fact, these haters just drive ppl like me into reflexive defense of bad robot and secret hideout.
 
A lot of youtube doofuses have mined a lot of clicks from screwball hate videos since Abrams did ST09. It's sad but inevitable. If these charlatans really cared about Trek, they'd dial down the histrionics, hatred, and invective and focus more on constructive criticism.

In fact, these haters just drive ppl like me into reflexive defense of bad robot and secret hideout.
Indeed. There's not thoughtfulness here; only blind hatred.

"Kurtzman is being pushed aside" is a clickbait article. There is nothing to substantiated it, one way or or the other, because we are not inside Paramount's inner workings*


*as far as you can prove.
 
Paramount has a deal with bad robot so Kurtman's name is still there, BUT they had him shift his focus to Clarence last year which likely helped give space to the more talented Akiva and Matalas to create better shows.

The words "Akiva" and "talented" do not belong in the same sentence together. :shifty:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top