• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Marvel Cinematic Universe spoiler-heavy speculation thread

What grade would you give the Marvel Cinematic Universe? (Ever-Changing Question)


  • Total voters
    188
Comparing the two latest Thor movies, I'd say Love and Thunder's serious parts were more serious than Ragnarok's but also much less well-executed.
 
Comparing the two latest Thor movies, I'd say Love and Thunder's serious parts were more serious than Ragnarok's but also much less well-executed.

What about Ragnarok's serious portions did you think was well-executed? As I've said, I feel the opposite was the case.
 
That's your excuse? Or reason? Do you expect me to just accept this? Because I don't. What? I'm only supposed to post positive comments about a movie? Or automatically agree with the dominant opinion? Because I refuse to go with the crowd. And by the way, I had typed some positive comments about "The Eternals" in an earlier post.

I was just responding to your question. You asked, and I assumed that your question was not rhetorical.
 
What about Ragnarok's serious portions did you think was well-executed? As I've said, I feel the opposite was the case.

I haven't seen it since it came out in theaters. I remember thinking the scene of Odin and his sons was quite characterful, in a subdued way. Same with the other heartfelt parts of Thor/Loki interaction. Valkyrie's angst...

Maybe it's less what Ragnarok did well and what I felt its sequel did badly. To me, the emotional beats in Love and Thunder felt by the numbers, checklist-like. Hemsworth and Portman never sold being a couple truly in love, in the way Hemsworth and Huddlestone truly felt like a contentious sibling dynamic. It came off more as an informed attribute. Gorr''s turn didn't feel organic, there because the plot needed it and not because it was a natural outgrowth.
 
I haven't seen it since it came out in theaters. I remember thinking the scene of Odin and his sons was quite characterful, in a subdued way. Same with the other heartfelt parts of Thor/Loki interaction. Valkyrie's angst...

Hmm, those parts worked okay, as far as I can remember. There was so much else that just didn't land, though.


Maybe it's less what Ragnarok did well and what I felt its sequel did badly. To me, the emotional beats in Love and Thunder felt by the numbers, checklist-like. Hemsworth and Portman never sold being a couple truly in love, in the way Hemsworth and Huddlestone truly felt like a contentious sibling dynamic. It came off more as an informed attribute. Gorr''s turn didn't feel organic, there because the plot needed it and not because it was a natural outgrowth.

More proof that these things are subjective. All of that worked for me. Thanks for satisfying my curiosity, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YLu
Aweseome trailer - funny but also bittersweet. Seems like the Guardians are in it for a rough time on a very personal level.
 
Perhaps this is the last Guardians film.

Like The Avengers, the Guardians have never been a set team. So yes, as we know them, this IS the last Guardians movie. James Gunn has stated this a long time ago. Doesn't mean Disnip won't be greedy enough to keep on cashing in,
 
Its not greedy to not just abandon fan favorite characters because a director/writer is moving on. Depending on what Guardians survive/actors still want to keep going, there are a bunch of things they could do with the premise of GotG, and many different versions of the team that could come about even if every current member goes away (which I doubt will happen, especially with the CG characters).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top