I’d want to know the details behind that show’s pipeline. We don’t know what it was, if Trek’s was longer because it had FX shots, and we don’t know how quickly a simple kiss could be worked into an existing story. Or hell if both writers were lunch companions and egging each other on to do something powerful. Plus, what were the ratings and demographics of the shows, and which had the bigger cultural impact because of that?Lol, no. The post production pipeline took much longer than that. If an episode went from filming to answer print in six weeks it would've been an incredible rush and an outlier.
The kiss seems to matter to a lot of people, and I need more information before I think it’s all a PR myth put together later.
Might be, yeah. Depends on what the story was there too. And what age group and who the audience were.Way better look than what Star Trek did.
Honestly I wasn’t even thinking about Variety, but okay, producers drop ads there because it does work too, or they wouldn’t for decades. A magazine everyone in the industry reads doesn’t not have an effect on it, and stay in business for decades. And it would only have to effect a single other producer to get the ball rolling.N-ope. @Harvey has it right.
Tiny box ads and a review in the trades, seen only by industry people, hardly qualifies as "press". And any familiarity with Variety shows you that agents and producers are constantly dropping ads in to get some attention, and little of it works.
Thanks, this is a valid and helpful point.We've scoured non-trades newspapers looking for mentions of the kiss controversy and pretty much come up empty handed.
As one does in idle conversation on a fan bulletin board. Dude. Bro. Man. Herbert.And "Dude" you are just inventing this supposed playground chatter. We look at documentary evidence...you're just speculating.
I guess kids (or adults) never talked about Star Trek then.P.S. No playground talk the next day cuz Trek was airing Friday nights at 10pm.![]()