Heh ... refits upon refits.
In a fleet where the uniforms change every time someone sneezes I'm not shocked they keep refitting the ship every few years.
Heh ... refits upon refits.
But I'm just so tired of the fan service.
Instead of "Strange New Worlds" we get "Star Trek Fan Service Of The Week" and it's killer because the show is so good it doesn't *need* to rely on TOS so much.
From having so many characters from TOS to having the non TOS characters have connections to TOS to having the plots connected to TOS. If there were full seasons 20+ it would be better because they could spread it out within new material. But with ten episode seasons it's just *so much* of the show.
indeed, I seem to remember one of the DSC novels in which a character - I think it was Sarek - is rather amused at how often Starfleet redesigns its uniforms.In a fleet where the uniforms change every time someone sneezes I'm not shocked they keep refitting the ship every few years.
Maybe that's where the couple first declared their feelings for each other.So, Pike held the wedding in the cargo bay instead off the ship's chapel?
Maybe that's where the couple first declared their feelings for each other.
They just show it that way for us Earthbound audiences to look more familiar and impressive. IIRC, in Babylon 5 they showed ships flipping around their axis rather than doing a big roll, and audiences thought that looked fake. But they were using real physics.I concur, Kirk was doing fine when when he doved down, but when he rose back up for the Immelman, I was like WTF?
That kind of stuff works better in atmosphere and with smaller fighter craft, not with big ships like the Farragut.
The manuevers you choose with a big ship and a fighter in 3D space should be drastically different.
I love it when they use real Physics in their 3D Space manueversThey just show it that way for us Earthbound audiences to look more familiar and impressive. IIRC, in Babylon 5 they showed ships flipping around their axis rather than doing a big roll, and audiences thought that looked fake. But they were using real physics.
I concur, but the choice of manuever is what I have a problem with. Not the fact on whether or not he can accomplish said manuever.Further, in space, no it doesn't matter whether it's a larger or smaller ship. Either way you use thrusters to rotate a ship around its axis. If a ship can do an Immelman in a given amount of time in space, it can logically flip around its axis in the same because both maneuvers aren't using atmosphere to accomplish it but thrusters to rotate the ship (along with other motions for the Immelman).
They just show it that way for us Earthbound audiences to look more familiar and impressive. IIRC, in Babylon 5 they showed ships flipping around their axis rather than doing a big roll, and audiences thought that looked fake.
I think I've demonstrated that this isn't the case, but fine, let's start over: All I'm saying is that I've been there, spending time and energy to explain every little inconsistency because the showrunners couldn't be bothered to be mindful of continuity, or simply because the needs of what they saw as a good story outweighed it. And it's a losing battle, because a lot of these inconsistencies are just plain logical contradictions. So, more recently, I decided that I was being silly, and mostly just gave up. Now I just want to enjoy the show for what it is. I don't think that means I've "lost" anything of my enthousiasm for Star Trek. I just choose to "spend" that enthousiasm differently.Again, you are interpreting my post's in a manner that suits your purpose.
Not in the manner in which they were delivered or intended.
Pike made a double mistake. He first hesitated. That caused the Farragut to be destroyed and the Enterprise had more severe damage. That caused him to make the second mistake of the big gamble at negotiating. He didn't listen to Spock about the need to destroy them, whereas Kirk did. So, I guess that's at least three mistakes.
I believe the phrase is "give the people what they want.Instead of "Strange New Worlds" we get "Star Trek Fan Service Of The Week" and it's killer because the show is so good it doesn't *need* to rely on TOS so much.
I did mention that in my review. I also said that you could probably put Kirk in a Pike mission and he might not do as well. But it's just a weird episode where you're told at the beginning that the lead will mess up big time, you wait for it, and it happens. But don't worry, it's all a reset (almost). It took me out of the episode a bit.I just take it not that Pike is inacpable/incompetent in that kinda situation he just didn't have the rights kind of command mechanism for it to work out the way it needed too. From what we've seen of him up to this point he's pretty much of the mentality of "we can work together to find a common ground and make this work" and, actually, that thought process almost works here. It's just that in this circumstance it takes Kirk's special kind of way of dealing with things fir stuff to work out "right."
It's not a situation where Pike's friendly approach will work. It's like Jelico in Chain of Command, him being put there wasn't to speak against Picard's or Riker's command styles it's that Jelico's experience with the Cardassians was the specific key needed for that situation to have the best possible chance of working.
This episode isn't saying Pike is a poor commander just not the "right" one for this to work.
And agreed, Wesley is no Kirk.
I think the crucial thing is to have a Captain who knows which mode to be in. Kirk started out cautious but changed his plan as events unfolded. He also took Spock's words to heart, unlike Pike. Adaptability.Sometimes a situation needs a Jim Kirk who'll blow up an enemy ship, violate enemy space and break the Prime Directive. And these are good things.
Draw in the crowd, or draw in the smaller groups of fans? Time will tell if that's a profitable strategy.I believe the phrase is "give the people what they want.
I agree that fan service of the week is not ideal. But, it's being demonstrated to work successfully and draw in the crowds. So...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.