• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 1x10 - "A Quality of Mercy"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    315
I hope the ST: Picard people take notes, because the Strange New World's season one finale is how you do a Romulan episode. I didn't love everything about, or in, this episode, but I thought the remixing of "Balance of Terror" was pretty neat. I wasn't expecting Kirk to be in the finale, so that was a surprise, and I also didn't expect him to be in the episode as much as he was. I thought they were going to kill him off to really show how different this timeline is.

It was so neat seeing a version of the TOS movie maroon uniform, though I would've preferred just using the existing style without the SNW flourishes. I didn't think the maroon uniforms needed them, that they still hold up as futuristic enough.

I liked the Romulan commander (wish it had been James Frain though). And while I thought adding the Praetor was a bit much (that could've just been an admiral), I did like the actress. She reminded me of TNG's Romulan actress Carolyn Seymour. I also liked the design for a lot of the Romulan costumes and ships. The helmets didn't do it for me, but for the most part I enjoyed what they did with the Romulans.

I do have some quibbles. Ortegas felt too out of character for me, and I wish they had just given Mitchell those lines or brought in Stiles. I also wouldn't have minded a bit more changing of the cast here, like say having Chapel as chief medic or maybe Piper instead of M'Benga. I thought La'an was wasted. Seems like she would've been on the Enterprise bridge at least after the Farragut had been destroyed.

Wesley didn't sell me that he's Shatner's Kirk. He didn't really have the charm or swagger. And I never considered Kirk to be particularly brash or hawkish like they tell us he is in this episode. I did like though seeing his relationship with Pike, his meeting Spock, reuniting with his brother, and the tidbits we get about his history.

In a way I feel this episode undercut Pike. We see that he's not the captain that Kirk is which unfortunately messes up the geek debates about who is the best Trek captain now when it comes to Pike. While Pike is a good captain, we see that his caution would've led to millions of deaths too.
 
In a way I feel this episode undercut Pike. We see that he's not the captain that Kirk is which unfortunately messes up the geek debates about who is the best Trek captain now when it comes to Pike. While Pike is a good captain, we see that his caution would've led to millions of deaths too

Pike ultimately saved millions of lives by allowing his fate to occur regardless of how horrifying it might be for him personally. In the alternate timeline, Pike took a gamble and it did not pay off. But those lives continue on. I think the geek debate is intact.
 
Pike Ultimately needs to leave the Captain's Chair of the USS Enterprise to Kirk and let the rest of the crew to move on with their legendary 5 year mission. That's obvious from a fan perspective.

And Captain Kirk was the right Captain for that situation. We need a "Cowboy Captain" to solve that issue of Galactic Importance. Spock ultimately plays a huge role to Galactic events in the future.
 
Pike ultimately saved millions of lives by allowing his fate to occur regardless of how horrifying it might be for him personally. In the alternate timeline, Pike took a gamble and it did not pay off. But those lives continue on. I think the geek debate is intact.

Fair enough, but in the head-to-head "Balance of Terror" scenario Kirk trumps Pike. Now, going back to "Balance of Terror" was a creative decision that put Pike in a tough corner. I'm sure there's other stories where Pike's approach would be superior to Kirk's, but by using one of the best Trek episodes (the SNW couldn't help themselves and as a I fan I did enjoy the fan service), I don't think it did Pike many favors vis-a-vis Kirk.

I do like that the episode did help explain Spock's actions in "The Menagerie" better though. We are now seeing why Spock has such a deep emotional connection to Pike.
 
I'm sorry, but I didn't like their quoting a classic TOS episode every chance they got. The resolution (meaning Spock has to survive) was interesting, however. I also had a lot of trouble getting my Paramount + app to work this morning; I eventually had to uninstall and then reinstall it on my Fire TV.:sigh:
 
Agreed on Wesley's Kirk, the biggest weakness of the episode. Decent, but no Shatner or Pine.

I guess alternate timeline 33-year-old Kirk behaves more like Wesley and I could see little moments of Shatner from TOS Season 1 in there but, yeah, glad he's not a series regular. Good, but Sam is more interesting in this particular show.
 
"Sam, your mustache...it keeps getting bigger."

"Aurelan's convinced it's gonna come alive one night and eat both us and the kids. Peter's taken to sleeping with the light on."
 
Horáková: Popular reception is as wrong about [TOS] Kirk’s general character as it is about his supposed hypersexuality. As Stefan Rabitsch has extensively documented in his essay... Kirk, like Picard, is based extensively on C. S. Forester’s British Age of Sail naval officer protagonist.
The resemblance is not situational or superficial, but foundational and carried through the series. Kirk, who is like Hornblower an educated, intelligent man capable of great sympathy, also shares Hornblower’s self-discipline, his commitment to his ship, his self-containment and his analytical decision-making process... Nobody would call Hornblower rash...
If Kirk takes a “leap of faith” in situations, it’s because the other choice is to sit still and die... Kirk’s decisions are often made under pressure, but they are also almost universally sound. Kirk is absolutely not a “maverick.” As a member of Starfleet he obeys orders he thinks are deeply unreasonable and personally repellant, as in “The Galileo Seven.” He kicks back only within the structure of Starfleet’s normal push-and-pull regarding the implementation of orders. People who accuse Kirk of being unusually loose with the prime directive forget that the narrative suggests that the Federation is still working out a common-law understanding of a concept that will solidify and become more important by the era of TNG. That’s the Watsonian explanation. The pleasingly co-creative Doylist one is that the production’s series bible was still working its way into being, and that the memory of “the prime directive” would enter the popular consciousness via TOS and feed back into a firm, fixed concept in TNG.
While I could give you endless examples of Kirk’s restraint, his comments in “Who Mourns for Adonais?”, when a god-like entity charms one of Kirk’s female junior officers and threatens to keep the crew as captive worshipers, rather epitomize the sheer distance between the reality of Kirk and the idea of the danger-loving space sexist...
http://strangehorizons.com/non-fiction/columns/freshly-rememberd-kirk-drift/
 
In that alternate timeline the only differences seem to be the inlaid delta pattern sewn into the shoulders and sleeves of the jacket and the front flap fastens at a lower angle. So the one we're familiar with from 2278-2349 exists because the TOS Era unfolded the way it did.
 
I wanted to love this episode, and I really like it, but I think there were better episodes this season. This still feels like TOS Trek to me, the best of it, and I'll take it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top