Oops! Sorry - fixedI didn't post that comment. Just sayin'.![]()
Oops! Sorry - fixedI didn't post that comment. Just sayin'.![]()
I was hoping it has the hip delta as well, and it does
![]()
There were clearly differences in the way they behaved, but they were subtle and weren't ratcheted up for the sake of comedy. Look at the way they hold their hands/arms. Their voice tone and inflections are different.
The writers also jokingly reference the fact that the differences between their behaviors are hard for others to see when T'Pring/Spock tells Pike, "Now that you know you can likely tell the very clear differences in our mannerisms."
They weren't going for "Freaky Friday" type comedy here.
I'm more concerned after these 2 T'Pring episodes with how they're going to handle Leila Kalomi who should meet Spock around Season 3. From what we knew in TOS, Leila had a shot with Spock but Spock didn't reciprocate because of his Vulcan lifestyle. T'Pring wasn't an issue because as far as we knew she was just someone he hadn't seen much since childhood and he could break off the betrothal at any time.I wonder how they are going to address Roger Korby. If they're doing an episode about every character I reckon Chapel's could be about that - it's a pretty major part of her backstory.
They have done the same on Picard. They went back to zippers, jeans, work boots, belts and collared button shirts that can all be bought at Walmart. It does take me out of the show to. The think that TOS did right was to make civilian clothing seem futuristic. Same with TNG, DS9 and STV. I guess they just don't have the budget to design cool looking 23rd century civilian clothing.
The two big negatives to the modern streaming era of TV are the short seasons and the long wait between them. On the other hand, many stories have been told of how hellishly difficult it was to produce 26 episodes every year for technically complex shows like Star Trek.I really could use a full 26 episodes of this show. I wouldn't be disappointed at all.
It looks much better when in bright light.Was it just me or did the Enterprise look particularly TOS-ish under the bright external lights of Starbase 1?
The following isn't my saying but paraphrasing who I was watching the episode with. I'm not doing anything in this post but paraphrasing what she said while watching this episode with me.A flirty nurse slapped a clueless Vulcan...
![]()
Was it just me or did the Enterprise look particularly TOS-ish under the bright external lights of Starbase 1?
Heh ... Yeah, but yer missing the point of the used "Title" obsessing over what it's called.But that's still not Bingo. It's a scavenger hunt!
T'Pring insisted that the differences were obvious and you could tell by Pike's expression he was like, "m'kay, if you say so." But as it progressed I saw subtle but notable differences in their behaviors. The way Spock held his/her hands in front of the body, wider-open eyes, vaguely panicked expression. Same with T'Pring as Spock, especially in the reaction to the Vulcan asshole saying, or you're the wierdo who's engaged to that half human abomination (paraphrasing:-) I thought they did an impressive job. They sure would have fooled some of us I guess.The actors certainly did a good job with what they were given. The differences were just too subtle IMO. Body swaps are funny IMO because of the characters being very out of character. For example, SG1 did a great body swap ep where Teal'c and O'Neil swap bodies. Seeing Tealc who is the stoic warrior type suddenly be the wise cracking O'Neil is very funny.
It looks much better when in bright light.
(just like the original did)
Or…This isn't my saying but my wife's saying. I'm not doing anything in this post but paraphrasing what she said while watching this episode with me.
She basically said she's tired of women acting like jerks, yelling and slapping people, and that this somehow passes for strong female characters in our fiction nowadays. I was surprised to hear her say this because to be honest I've felt the same way for some time but didn't want to say anything for fear of being accused of sexist, not supportive of strong female characters, etc. I won't deny I was kind of relieved to hear her say this while watching it (now knowing it wasn't just me feeling this way and that I wasn't having sexist thoughts or whatever since I now know a woman also feels the same way about these portrayals). She said she looked forward to the Pike, M'Benga, and April scenes because the characters acted calmer and more rationally.
For what it's worth she also didn't take well to Raffi and to some degree Seven over at Picard.
And no, my wife doesn't know anything about TOS (she's relatively new to Trek) and thus has no idea that Chapel existed as a character in the 1960s and thus has no preconceived ideas about Chapel or TOS that would be influencing her opinion.
If you read my post carefully she was complaining about much more than the slap. Just the overall portrayal in general.Or…
It was a playful slap in a episode that doesn’t take itself too seriously.
There are a multitude of other reasons why Chapel is a strong female character. Her professional competence, her charisma and personality, her passion and relatability…
Focusing on the slap is missing everything else IMO.
I've known several women who have acted similar to this toward folks they consider Friends during my life.She basically said she's tired of women acting like jerks, yelling and slapping people, and that this somehow passes for strong female characters in our fiction nowadays.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.