From your lips to Akiva and Terry's ears.That’s some good writing there. I saw the scene play out as I read the lines.

From your lips to Akiva and Terry's ears.That’s some good writing there. I saw the scene play out as I read the lines.
It's not social commentary, that's my point. It's blunt force trauma.
We're talking about the franchise with the half-black, half-white face guys. If that's the low bar, I would say this episode was leaps and bounds above it in terms of subtlety.It's not social commentary, that's my point. It's blunt force trauma.
That's not remotely true. Lots of story turns are entirely predictable or expected yet still well-written. Not everything needs to be constant M. Night Shyamalan twists and Abrams mystery boxing.If you're predicting what the writers do before they do it, it's not good writing.
It's lazy to assume that just because someone disagrees with you it means they didn't read or deliberately ignored what you wrote.Again, as I said and you chose to ignore, the writers were good with allegories. That was how Star Trek did it well. Now it's just blunt.
Besides the fact that they specifically explained exactly what ICE was in the episode, and it's been a pretty well-publicized and infamous agency judging by the international response to its actions here (on the board) and elsewhere in international media, and similar government responses to immigrants and refugees have been happening around the world in recent years to make it a relevant subject everywhere, and everyone in the audience now has Google at their fingertips to answer any question at a moments notice; besides all that, the context of what was going on and who was doing what was plainly evident by the events of the episode.And it's very Americanly blunt. Sure the writers are American predominantly I guess. But someone said to me "What is this ICE stuff they keep on about they seem obsessed?" The whole thing is predicated on an American world view, and it's not even done in a way that wider audiences an appreciate easily.
In fairness, he was saying that Seven and Young Guinan are both shown in scenes where they are driving or about to drive cars, not him confusing Guinan and Raffi as the same person. Guinan has a vintage brown Ford Bronco which she obviously intends to drive away in.Wait wait wait. "Young Guinan?"
Guinan is nowhere in that scene. Seven steals an LAPD car with Raffi Musiker, a principal cast member who has been on the show since the first season. Raffi is played by Michelle Hurd, a 55-year-old actor who looks like this:
![]()
Young Guinan is played by Ito Aghayere, a 33-year-old actor who looks like this:
![]()
Did you seriously just whine about how you think PIC's social commentary is "hamfisted, poorly written nonsense" whose writers "just say what they think" and "clearly have an issue" with ICE and made the episode "just a soapbox"...
... and then immediately confuse two entirely different black actors who look nothing like one-another and were very clearly in different locations and addressed by different character names??
Christ, you can't even make this shit up. Your dogwhistle is broken, sir.
Re: The Ten Forward thing.
These are a couple of questions to those who have a problem with the address of Guinan's bar being 10 Forward Avenue.
How did you rationalize that name of the Ten Forward recreational facility on the Enterprise-D was a play on words with the 20th century ten-code 10-4 used in Citizen's Band radio and other voice communication? Did that never bother you?
Works for me.
Yes, but why not name your bar on a starship to reference serendipitously another bar you once worked at before that perhaps you have fond memories of?Trek tackled racism once by having two aliens with different sides of their face painted black hating each other. It's not always been subtle with it's topic.
The Ten Forward thing:
I say, AGAIN, that it couldn't have been named/located where it was as a tribute to Guinan's Earth bar because the bar was there before Guinan was!
Nope, because I never noticed it.How did you rationalize that name of the Ten Forward recreational facility on the Enterprise-D was a play on words with the 20th century ten-code 10-4 used in Citizen's Band radio and other voice communication? Did that never bother you?
It seems like a much needed wake up call. We're destroying our world, authoritarian, racism, extreme income inequality, inhumane conditions, etc. We're on track towards the Confederation.Well, but it *would* explain why such a huge amount of aliens (most of them far advanced) take such particular interest in humanity. Think about it: The Vulcans, Q, Guinan, Gary Seven/ Supervisors... They had to prevent the worst from happening! I like this explanation better than human exceptionalsm. But they won't do it.
ETA: My previous post refers to the "Confederate AU being the original timeline" theory.
For all we know with what was shown in Star Trek: First Contact, the Borg sphere debris burns up in the atmosphere and no pieces made it to Earth. What a canonized was the fact that debris did in fact make it to Earth and landed in the Arctic. (and I stayed is as much in my original post.)They canonized the events of Star Trek: First Contact on the day they released Star Trek: First Contact.
Indeed. It's just a fun little reference, not a cause and effect. Kind of like "Denis the Menance."Yes, but why not name your bar on a starship to reference serendipitously another bar you once worked at before that perhaps you have fond memories of?
Again, as I said and you chose to ignore, the writers were good with allegories. That was how Star Trek did it well. Now it's just blunt.
Well, he specifically referred to Guinan and Seven,the car chase and how he switched off.In fairness, he was saying that Seven and Young Guinan are both shown in scenes where they are driving or about to drive cars, not him confusing Guinan and Raffi as the same person. Guinan has a vintage brown Ford Bronco which she obviously intends to drive away in.
Seems to me he's putting Guinan and Seven in a car together and involved in a car chase. Somethings that Guinan was shown not to be part of. And since she's been a resident of the Earth since before the invention of the auto I can't see why anyone could object to Guinan driving. IIRC, Guinan doesn't even walk to her car until the car chases is well underway and maybe over.When I saw the young Guinan and Seven just driving a car 'just like that' I switched off. I can't be bothered as to what absurd excuses they have for not having Whoopi in the scene. I can't be bothered with car chases... this is meant to be Star Trek.
I said the same thing in a previous post. It's a silly complaint.And since she's been a resident of the Earth since before the invention of the auto I can't see why anyone could object to Guinan driving.
The moment they beamed into LA i said "I bet they make some comment about homelessness" and boom there it was.
dumb fans
It seems like an almost Oxford Comma kind if situation, you kinda have to read through the sentence into the intent behind the poster and assume they didn't confuse two characters.
He was bothered by the portrayal of Young Guinan AND, separately, Seven driving a car like a professional stunt driver "just like that."
Yes, but why not name your bar on a starship to reference serendipitously another bar you once worked at before that perhaps you have fond memories of?
I live a small rural Californian city in the Sierras foothills. I see homeless people weekly. It's not a Big City thing. I once found a person in the back of where I worked who had built a shelter out of pallets .
Maybe not the bar. But it was probably an observation lounge or something.THE BAR WAS THERE BEFORE GUINAN!!! She couldn't have named it, it was named before she came aboard!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.