Not NOW, Marion!
Not now, Madeline.
There we go, evidence of different universes! lol
Not NOW, Marion!
Not now, Madeline.
Well your question was absurd and completely unrelated to the issue, I gave it more dignity than it or your beliefs deserve.You didn't really answer the question but okay.
The difference is that in the first sentence you are exercising your personal right to allow someone to sleep in your yard. I fully support your right to do that with your own property (Though frankly I suspect there would be a limit to your tolerance at some point if that person decided to make the arrangement more permanent.)
In the second sentence you are making a value judgement about how the collective property and resources of the country should be managed or distributed based on your personal beliefs. Basically you are saying that in your view, not only would you be willing to have someone just at random sleep in your yard if they wish but that everyone else should also be similarly willing to do so and, if not, made to by force if necessary.
Yeah that whole Meatball vs Worm was a relic of Daniel Goldin's tenure as Admin. He did some good things to NASA but he was by no means perfect and the attempt to distance NASA from a successful era he wasn't part of by rebranding was silly. Glad that's over.The Artemis rocket standing on the pad right now would like a word with you...
![]()
It's right at Union Station, hard to miss when you show LA
Didn't Picard kill Sarek and made his son watch?
The Borg must've assimilated dozens of car-driving cultures![]()
This narrative is what always happens, this notion that hyper-individuality is more important than the collective benefit, one, and two, that it occurs in a vacuum. Instead of talking about support systems nationwide to give shelter and aid to people crossing the border, you're laying it upon the individual to act, as if the individual must take on all responsibilities simply for wanting people to be protected from exploitation.You didn't really answer the question but okay.
The difference is that in the first sentence you are exercising your personal right to allow someone to sleep in your yard. I fully support your right to do that with your own property (Though frankly I suspect there would be a limit to your tolerance at some point if that person decided to make the arrangement more permanent.)
In the second sentence you are making a value judgement about how the collective property and resources of the country should be managed or distributed based on your personal beliefs. Basically you are saying that in your view, not only would you be willing to have someone just at random sleep in your yard if they wish but that everyone else should also be similarly willing to do so and, if not, made to by force if necessary.
Thanks for proving my point about progressives.Well your question was absurd and completely unrelated to the issue, I gave it more dignity than it or your beliefs deserve.
She didn't do anything but give you comfort in your biases. The show brought discomfort and disbelief, and so it required reinforcement of deeply held beliefs. Finding a flaw with someone's human reaction and using it as a cudgel to reject the entire argument is not uncommon, but it is unreasonable. When you say someone is getting emotional, that is a disingenuous tactic, as it presumes you are acting rationally and without interfering bias. It is also bullshit.Thanks for proving my point about progressives.
The question I have is, if this is the case, and Jurati is the Borg Queen who asks for help in 2401, then the events we're seeing must have already happened i.e. they're stuck in some kind of temporal loop. Maybe Q's "interference" is really an attempt to stop this loop and the lesson Picard must learn/what he needs to atone for is how to trust his supposed enemies?So a theory I had. Could it be the divergence in three days is something going wrong with the Europa mission? Say, it gets destroyed. But, there's also now a Borgified La Sirena near Europa where a battle between the Queen and Jurati took place. Jurati wins, becomes the new Borg Queen, and opens a space/time rift to 2401 to enlist Picard's help? The divergence is NASA, or whichever agency is in charge of Europa, detects the Borgified ship, reasons that it was what caused the Europa craft to blow up, and Adam Soong uses this platform to get elected President, vowing to unite Earth to wipe out all extraterrestrial threats. World War III is averted, and the Confederation is born.
I assumed that was the case from the very start personally. He/Starfleet didn't trust the Borg, so Q put him in a timeline where Humanity doesn't trust anything alien.and the lesson Picard must learn/what he needs to atone for is how to trust his supposed enemies?
I'm sure that no matter what I said you'd convince yourself that your misguided beliefs were correct and justified. You aren't interested in a debate, you're interested in shouting down anyone who disagrees with you while spreading misinformation and ignoring any evidence that contradicts your unfounded beliefs.Thanks for proving my point about progressives.
So a theory I had. Could it be the divergence in three days is something going wrong with the Europa mission? Say, it gets destroyed. But, there's also now a Borgified La Sirena near Europa where a battle between the Queen and Jurati took place. Jurati wins, becomes the new Borg Queen, and opens a space/time rift to 2401 to enlist Picard's help? The divergence is NASA, or whichever agency is in charge of Europa, detects the Borgified ship, reasons that it was what caused the Europa craft to blow up, and Adam Soong uses this platform to get elected President, vowing to unite Earth to wipe out all extraterrestrial threats. World War III is averted, and the Confederation is born.
The building Renee Picard came out of has the NASA Logo and Europa Mission logo on the doors. Q was also wearing a coat with the Europa mission logo on it.
So the Europa mission is very much connected, as is Renee Picard, whom Picard mentioned in this Academy speech in episode 1 as someone who helped explore the solar system.
So it's Renée Picard, not Rene. The final scene makes sense now.
Yeah sorry, her name only shows up in the subtitles, and Amazon Prime's X-Ray features. She is credited at the end of the episode, but not with a character name.Yes, I was quite confused at this scene as well. I had no idea what the significance of the woman was until just now.
Thanks for proving my point about progressives.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.