• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 4x09 - "Rubicon"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    102
Last Season they said Discovery can't jump while cloaked, and yet here we are. Maybe they had some upgrades done :P

Eaves hasn't worked on Discovery since Season 1.

Has there been even a mention of the Treaty Of Algeron as regards to Federation cloaks?

Like, it was assumed to be null once the Romulans reunited with the Vulcans on "Ni'Var" and the treaty clearly states "Romulan".
 
It was signed 879 years earlier and between the Federation and a power that no longer exists: the Romulan Star Empire. My guess is the Treaty of Algeron ceased to be a legally-enforced document sometime after 2387.

The Treaty of So Long Losers! some deep cynics may refer to.
 
Has there been even a mention of the Treaty Of Algeron as regards to Federation cloaks?

Like, it was assumed to be null once the Romulans reunited with the Vulcans on "Ni'Var" and the treaty clearly states "Romulan".
probably even before that. In the All Good Things timeline the romulan star empire no longer exist and federation ships use cloaks, however on Picard it seem that the treaty is still in effect, but the romulans still have some sovereign space.
 
probably even before that. In the All Good Things timeline the romulan star empire no longer exist and federation ships use cloaks, however on Picard it seem that the treaty is still in effect, but the romulans still have some sovereign space.

I would lean towards it not being as much connected to the Romulan empire collapsing or the Romulans settling on Vulcan as much as the combined Ni'Var being a Federation member that may have nullified the treaty, or at least parts of it.
 
I doubt they'd go that route.

Whether or not Gary was ultimately responsible for his actions is irrelevant. No one who went on a murderous rampage like that is gonna get a ship named after him.

Also, it's not like he was a Kirk or Spock or Picard or Sisko or Janeway or Archer or April or Pike or Georgoux or Decker or Garth or Tryla Scott or Calhoune or Riker or Kira or Odo or Worf or Data or McCoy or Scotty or Cochrane or Dax or Sulu or Harriman or Garrett or Neil Armstrong or Surak or Shran or T'pou or Gorkon or Albert Einstein or any of the other larger than life figures we see ships named after. He was a Lt Commander who likely had a very good service record before dying young.
 
Vance could have gone along himself in the Nahn role. Given that this mission was fate-of-the-universe stuff, surely he's got a deputy back at base who can handle replenishing the food synthesizer stocks.

The whole point of Nhan was Vance giving Rillak a carrot so she would back off. Vance trusted Burnham to get the job done without any supervision and felt that she didn't need it.
 
Also, it's not like he was a Kirk or Spock or Picard or Sisko or Janeway or Archer or April or Pike or Georgoux or Decker or Garth or Tryla Scott or Calhoune or Riker or Kira or Odo or Worf or Data or McCoy or Scotty or Cochrane or Dax or Sulu or Harriman or Garrett or Neil Armstrong or Surak or Shran or T'pou or Gorkon or Albert Einstein or any of the other larger than life figures we see ships named after. He was a Lt Commander who likely had a very good service record before dying young.

I'd also worry about 32nd century Starfleet being infatuated with eight/nine hundred year old characters as stretching credibility somewhat. Today we don't tend to name ships after thirteenth century people anywhere near as much as those from the last one hundred years.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top