Because I keep wondering if the Disco writers will come out with something more meaningful and approach a situation with more common sense... and when they don't, they keep surprising me with how dumb of an approach they take.
I guess that's one thing they're good at.
You should've expected it by now. We're on Season 4.
I agree, but may I ask how is that reply relevant to having 2 captains on the same ship?
They both are in agreement to be on the same ship and work together as Captain & #1.
If both are fine with that arrangement, I don't see any issue.
Is this the first time in Star Trek history of having two Captain-ranked officers on the same ship in the Skipper & First Mate positions?
It was a nice snetiment, but grossly out of place given they were effectively on opposing sides.
Yet they didn't murder each other, just damage each others ships a bit.
Nothing that can't be repaired.
Agreed. Alien data apparently has no issues overwriting or influencing SF ship systems/OS, but the reverse apparently cannot do the same.
Although, to be fair, UFP OS was written to be friendly and understandable by most probably because it incorporated hundreds of different alien species.
This is a benefit and openness of UFP, but it could also be a flaw when dealing with aliens or code that has has a more 'assertive' programming.
SF should have really learned to protect their OS by this point. But the SPhere Data also worked with information and languages of species that existed across 100 000 years... and to be fair, this would have its advantages, but in fairness, UFP by the 24th century already would have also had extrapolation capabilities which would be able to take new languages and learn from them in a proverbial instant.
Perhaps the 23rd century Disco computer systems were more vulnerable because UFP was effectively smaller at that point in time with less probabilistic extrapolation algorithms?
That would require technical competency on StarFleet's part. I know you & I wouldn't have issue implementing that in the SF Universe, but the current writers in charge. -_-.
This is the thing Trek is in dire need of fixing. There are always ways to work with advanced tech and I'm sorely disappointed that Disco's 'team of writers' seem to be clueless about how to do this properly (especially when there is a TON of solid material out there to draw inspiration from).
It's a old issue that we both agree on, next!
Clever analogy. Never saw Naruto myself, but I also kinda liked that teleport fight.
It's a great Shonen, pretty legendary series in the Anime/Manga world. Very long running.
Actually, Tarka is not from the Prime Trek universe (the one he is presently living in). I think he clearly said he comes from a different/alternate universe in which the Burn never happened... but the details on this are mixed. I'll have to rewatch these episodes again.
Go back and watch it again, I think you might've misunderstood where Tarka was from.
That... actually makes sense.
But, I think Booker is still liable because he's been working with Starfleet and living on their ship.
Tarka... pretty much can be punished in lots of ways.
Book can probably still be held liable to a degree for his actions because he stole UFP property.
Booker is liable as the "Get-away" driver & "Aidding & Abetting".
But he didn't steal the proto-type. That's all Tarka.
Correct... but again, that doesn't explain on where the heck are the SCHEMATICS and research data on the Spore Drive v2 prototype to begin with?
That data would have to exist in SF/s database, so making a huge deal as if SF cannot make another one without the prototype is literally insane.
The schematics for the working prototype exist in the database. Just whip it out by whoever has the authority and replicate it en mass for testing.
True
Indeed... but even by the 24th century computers already advanced to the point where artificial brains were a thing.
So, the spore drive would have worked with that.
Maybe.
Disco S1 clearly stated that Disco computer systems were too slow for making needed calculations for long distance jumps but that shorter jumps were doable.
Even with shorter jumps being done constantly by a computer, SF could have an adaptive algorithm record where the issues arise (at which distances) and build better computers specifically to accommodate for that task.
In fact, I'd even go as far to say that computer controlled Spore Drive (no bio navigator needed) would have been solved realistically in 10 to 20 odd years... possibly a bit more.
Maybe, depends on the type of processing / calculations needed.
This 'living navigator' nonsense is really getting on my nerves... 32nd century tech should be WAY ahead of what's needed to operate the Spore Drive without a living navigator... what with all that talk about how tech advanced in the 930 years and all... everyone's all talk but no substance on this matter.
There are some things that Humans are still superior at then tech.
Maybe being a biological Navigator is one of them.